Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What About Those In Non-Christian Lands Who Have Never Heard The Gospel?

Question: How is God good or just to abandon to Hell those who have never even heard the gospel?

JAG Writes:

Consider the following:

First, we Bible believing Christians start with the true proclamation that
God always does that which is right.

This means that the God who always does what is right, world-wide
and history-wide, is never going to abandon one of His elect to Gehenna,
but will find a way to save them and give them the gift of eternal life as
per John 3:16's "shall not perish but have eternal life."

Second, we Bible believing Christians MUST stay within the confines
of doctrinal orthodoxy and so we hold solid and fast to John 14:6
that correctly teaches: no man can come to the Father except through
believing in the Lord Jesus as his Savior.

Third, none of the above prevents us from considering the following:

Eternal Now. With regard to God's knowledge there is no past. present and future.
God sees everything in the Eternal NOW. God's Omniscience demands this position.
God now knows all that can be known, God does not learn new information and new truths.


So?

So the Eternal NOW knowledge is God's reality. And God's reality IS REALITY.

What YOU (we) can see is very limited and what YOU (we) can see IS NOT REALITY.

God has Middle Knowledge -- what that means is that God sees and knows fully
what every human being would choose to do under all possible sets of different
circumstances.


Let us take for an example a man named Akua Adisa, born in Africa in the year 1600 A.D.

Akua lived and died never knowing a single word of the gospel message.

God's Middle Knowledge knows precisely what Akua Adisa will choose to do in all possible
sets of circumstances --

-- for example if Akua Adisa had been born in, say, South Carolina in the year 1990 A.D.
and had traveled to hear Franklin Graham preach the gospel.

How is this ↓ conclusion NOT compelling?
If the Sovereign God knows that Akua Adisa would have accepted the Lord Jesus as his
Savior if he had been born in the year 1990 A.D. in South Carolina when he heard Franklin
Graham preach the gospel then in God's reality Akua Adisa has accepted the Lord Jesus as
his Savior and has therefore fulfilled the requirements of John 14:6 no man can come to the
Father except through faith in the Lord Jesus.

Are we not compelled to reach this conclusion?

Thoughts?

__________________________

PS
God's Omniscience demands we hold that God has what the philosophers call
Middle Knowledge.


JAG

[]
This is complete fantasy. God saves a multitude of unsaved sinners and draws them effectually.
 
That up there is just another way of saying that on your
interpretation of what the Lord Jesus said about the
generation that lived in the first century -- also applies
to ALL future generations in all of human history.

So on your interpretation of the New Testament and
what Jesus said, we end up with the kind of God that
knew BEFORE He created the human race that the
majority was going to end up screaming in eternal.
Hell forever and ever and ever with NEVER an end
to their agony, and by the way let me tell you that
"God is love."

On your personal interpretation of what Jesus said, that
means that worldwide -- history wide, there are TENS OF
BILLIONS of humans that will scream in agony forever and
ever and ever in eternal Helll -- and again God knew all that
BEFORE He created man -- but went ahead and created man
anyway and let me tell you again that "God is love."

The Christian Church is even now starting to abandon such as
that up there. Believing that up there is NOT required in order
to be a Bible believing orthodox Christian. And its a monstrous
wrong doctrine because of the way it presents the character of
God.

__________________


But . . .

I do understand fully how you feel. In your mind you see it as standing
true to the Bible. And you would feel guilty of becoming a compromiser
if you did not continue to hold your present position. This means that if
you are locked down on your position, then there is no help for ,you.

If on the other hand you are open to this:
■ You can be a 100% true blue Bible believing Christian
and at the same time
■ Get rid of the notion that the majority of the human race is going
to scream in eternal Hell forever and ever and ever and ever and ever.

________________


I am going to post this below just in case you are open minded to
something better:

An Ugly Hideous Monstrous Interpretation Of Matthew 7:13-14
By JAG

Matthew 7:13-14
"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the way that
leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and
narrow is the road that leads to life, and only a few find it."


Humans put forth their own interpretation of Matthew 7:13-14 and their own
interpretation has consequences. Their own interpretation of Matthew 7:13-14
also tells us what they think God is like in His nature. The interpretation of
Matthew 7:13-14 presented by the three schools of Pessimistic Eschatology.
which are {1) Amillennialism (2) Premillennialism (3) Dispensationalism present
God as deliberately choosing to create a race of untold billions of His human
creatures knowing BEFORE He chose to create them that the majority of them
would spend an eternity screaming in agony in the pits of eternal Hell. And many
of these folks tell us not only will the majority of God's human creatures scream in Hell
for all eternity, but it will be the overwhelming vast majority that scream in agony in
Hell for all eternity. Then in the next breath they tell us that God is LOVE and full of
kindness and compassion.

My view is that their free-will-chosen interpretation of Matthew 7:13-14 is wrong. It's
not right to do that. It's not a good thing to do that. It's a bad thing to interpret
Matthew 7:13-14 in such a way that portrays God as the kind of Being that
would create untold billions of human beings knowing BEFORE He created them that
the majority would end up screaming in agony in Hell for all eternity, but then knowing
that, went ahead and created them anyway, but this is exactly and precisely what their
interpretation of Matthew 7:13-14 means and they cannot escape from this their
portrayal of the nature of God. Their interpretation of Matthew 7:13-14 tells you,
that on their interpretation of Matthew 7:13-14, God has done exactly that and
that God is the kind of Being who would do that and that He actually has done that.

What is the solution to this? There is an alternative interpretation of Matthew
7:13-14 that is reasonable and it says Matthew 7:13-14 describes ONLY the very bad
spiritual conditions of the 1st century when Jesus spoke the words of Matthew 7:13-14
in that 1st century generation of Jews who ended up rejecting Him as their Savior and
ultimately murdered the innocent Lord Jesus. Indeed only a relatively few in that 1st
century generation, did find the Lord Jesus as their Savior. But that 1st century generation
is NOT representative of the entire human race and all future human generations, and
there is NOT a single Bible verse that says it is. So? So you don't have to believe that
it is representative. You can use your free will to choose NOT to believe that it is
representative of the entire human race. And in fact it is NOT representative of the
entire human race and all future generations.


So?

So the three schools of Pessimistic Eschatology {1) Amillennialism (2) Premillennialism
(3) Dispensationalism do NOT have to interpret Matthew7:13-14 as being historically
predictive of the future of the human race. They use their free will to choose to interpret
Matthew 7:13-14 that way ~~ and it's wrong to do that. It's not right. It's not a good
thing to do, to interpret Matthew 7:13-14 in such as way that presents God as being
the kind of Being that creates untold billions of human beings knowing BEFORE He
created them, that the majority of them would end up screaming in agony in Hell for
all eternity.

__________________

If you are interested I have another article titled
"Will Only A Few Be Saved? No A Great Multitude Will Be Saved."
Let me know if you are interested and I'll post it.

Best

JAG

[]
Sad that you openly deny scripture.
 
Here's the problem as I see it:

One gospel has to be correct and the others have to necessarily be ANOTHER GOSPEL.
Which one is the big question.

I like to think the correct gospel is the one the early Christians followed.
The REALLY early Christians.

You don't agree?
Why not?



Oh yeah.
Then why do you believe something totally different than I do?
(please don't speak about being brought up-bringing in the family - I think we here have studied enough on our own).



Gnostics at that point.
But there were also many others.
Including Manechaenism - of which Augustine was one.
(had to get that in there...)



But don't YOU also have representatives of God?
Wouldn't those be your primary theologians?

When did the CC have multiple Popes?



I'd like to post something Mr. Calvin wrote in book 3, but I feel it would be too mean of me.
I have my limits.



OK. I think I could agree with this.
We are saved by faith in Christ.
AND by following Him and His teachings. (as best we can).



We are not chosen.
We are not elected.
At least not the way you understand it.

We ARE chosen but based on something God let us know about.
He let us know HOW to become saved since that's why Jesus died.
Why have Jesus be sacrificed if salvation didn't depend on Him?
Why all those OT sacrifices if, anyway, God knew by chosing the person, who would be saved and who would not.
Whimsical God you believe in.
He's not even honest with His favorite creation...us.
Even prepared a Garden for us and all.



I've said it many times to you, so I'm not repeating it here.
Read Ephesians 2:8 AGAIN.

At least I have a 99% chance of knowing of my salvation.
YOU do NOT.
Must I explain why,,,,again?


Nothing is dependent on our understanding anything.
You think only scholars can be saved?
I told you all we need:
Love God
Obey Him
Love Others
Treat them as you would have them treat you.

Oh my. I'll have to get back to this...dinner time here.
I think reformed doctrine causes many contradictions.


LOL


LOL too bad!



You have a problem with the above because of your belief in Limited Atonement.
I can explain it again if you wish...not that it would do any good.


If a Muslim believes in God Father, the creator, and worships Him and obeys Him....
He is also worshipping Jesus.
Is Jesus God or not?
Or, maybe they believe in Jesus too but are afraid to get their head cut off.
Only God knows the heart.
Muslims deny Jesus is God. They do not worship the biblical God. What are you making up?
 
Before Lord Jesus and the Gospel, the Jews believed in God. The true believers of the OT were God-fearers (Hebrews 11). The OT saints did not have in mind that they had to believe in the Messiah to be saved, and such is not indicated in the OT.
The true believers in the OT were the Sethian line, Noah, Enoch, and those in the Abrahamic Covenant, to name a few.
Without a Temple the God-fearers developed after the “Jews” returned from exile.
Being in the Mosaic Covenant and the Prophecy of a prophet like unto Moses those that trusted (had faith) in the promise were Christian and looked forward to their promise from their God.
The Syrophenecian woman, the Samaritan woman at the well, and the Roman centurion had great faith because they accepted Jesus as Israel’s promised Messiah/Christ and went to Him for their various needs. They were elect and Jesus healed/delivered/saved them. They walked by both sight and faith.
 
A heretic is just someone that doesn't agree with what everyone else is in agreement.

Incorrect.
A heretic is one that believes something other than what God has taught in His Scripture of Truth.

I think you're both right. Wondering's definition is from man's point of view and Jeremiah's definition is from God's point of view. I suppose from an individual's point a view a heretic is "anyone that disagrees with that person".
Wondering and I both think the other is a heretic ... *giggle*
 
I think you're both right. Wondering's definition is from man's point of view and Jeremiah's definition is from God's point of view. I suppose from an individual's point a view a heretic is "anyone that disagrees with that person".
Wondering and I both think the other is a heretic ... *giggle*
wondering said:
A heretic is just someone that doesn't agree with what everyone else is in agreement.

This is not necessarily true.
"If 50 million people say a wrong thing, it's still a wrong thing." ---- Albert Einstein.

Truth does not rest on what the majority think. Truth rests on what God says is true and on what God says is false/lie. He is the final arbiter of what's true in His creation.
 
This is not necessarily true.
"If 50 million people say a wrong thing, it's still a wrong thing." ---- Albert Einstein.
The statement is true but not relevant to the definition of 'heretic'.

Truth does not rest on what the majority think. Truth rests on what God says is true and on what God says is false/lie. He is the final arbiter of what's true in His creation.
Again, you're presenting a straw man argument. The question at hand is "what is a heretic" and not "what is truth".

Google search:
  • A person who holds controversial opinions, especially one who publicly dissents from the officially accepted dogma of the Roman Catholic Church.
  • One who holds and persistently maintains an opinion or a doctrine at variance with the accepted standards of any school or party, and rejected or condemned by it; one who rejects a generally accepted belief.
  • Specifically, in theology, a professed believer who adopts and persistently maintains religious opinions contrary to the accepted standards of his church.
If anything, wondering 's definition is the correct one. She also wisely use a dictionary to make her point.
 
The statement is true but not relevant to the definition of 'heretic'.


Again, you're presenting a straw man argument. The question at hand is "what is a heretic" and not "what is truth".

Google search:
  • A person who holds controversial opinions, especially one who publicly dissents from the officially accepted dogma of the Roman Catholic Church.
  • One who holds and persistently maintains an opinion or a doctrine at variance with the accepted standards of any school or party, and rejected or condemned by it; one who rejects a generally accepted belief.
  • Specifically, in theology, a professed believer who adopts and persistently maintains religious opinions contrary to the accepted standards of his church.
If anything, wondering 's definition is the correct one. She also wisely use a dictionary to make her point.
 
Man contradictory to what you think ,despite that often sees god as a pantheistic in that God is impersonal and most faiths other then Judaism and Christianity see God as impersonable. You can't approach him or know him.
What is being normalized now is very much what Paul adress in Romans three.

Pedophilia ,pedastery and gay rights and child sacrifices.

Without God wanting to tell us in his word man can't find him or know .otherwise peter would not have been told flesh and blood didn't tell you that Jesus was the son of God .peter could have reasoned it out .

We all know Good but the desire to be evil is much greater .you never have seen war and how children act willingly to kill you and do so .they ain't so innocent even at six.

You've seen much evil J, so it has affected you a lot.
Most persons don't experience what you have.
I firmly believe man should not have to see what he sees in war-time.

Jesus did say that the road that leads to destruction is broad.
I see people and it's difficult to believe that they prefer evil...
and yet this is what the sin nature brings to humanity.
So we need to believe what we would prefer not to believe.


Six year olds selling drugs and prostitutes in Afghanistan. Sure they were taught or saw it but well if you know that logic of yours to be truth then these would not be a majority over there .

That said you can't call a honest jw or Mormon a heretic if they sincerely believe that as if they die and no one says otherwise .

Your doctrine makes God deceptive when He could simply appear and tell all about himself but he chooses not to .it happens but it's not common .

I don't make doctrine on what only God says.i have seen pagan cultures up close.

As I said you won't look at dogs and kids the same after war . We shot dogs often because they were sick .dogs don't trust muslims and kids often did carry and fire at us.not often but the word infantry is from the Latin world child ,spanish enfante child soldiers .

Sure the adults are leading them but children are not free from their crimes.
If a minor takes my gun and I lead him to kill.i may get a greater sentence but the minor also commits a crime and is punishable.

Knowing good doesn't mean we can be that good .
I'd say, as I have all throughout, that a JW and a Mormon do not believe what mainline Christianity believes even though they like to call themselves Christians.

However, it is God that will make the final decision.
As I've said, I believe that anyone that honors Him and worships Him and obeys Him will probably see Him in heaven, no matter what religion they are.

Jesus has thrown down the wall between Jews and Gentiles.
 
Before I scrolled down, I knew you were going to refer to a Webster's dictionary.
First, the first American dictionary was published by Noah Webster in the early 1820s. He finally was successful in his dictionary finally becoming popular and useful in his 1828 edition.
I don't remember the year, but his copyright was sold to Merriam.
Anyways, if you want to know biblical terms/words refer to a Strong's Hebrew and Greek concordance. Preferably his Exhaustive Concordance of every word definable in the KJV Bible.

So, here's a passage where the word is used:

17 Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. 18 For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. 19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. 1 Cor. 11:17–19.

The word "divisions" is the word "schisma" and it means:
Strong's Greek #4978 from <#4977> (schizo); a split or gap (“schism”), literal or figurative.
It's like taking an axe and striking a log so that a split or gap appears. This is what lack of love for brethren produces. The word is translated also as "rent" (2 times) and "schism" (1 time) besides "divisions" (5 times.)

The word "heresies" is "hairesis." Strong's #139.
from Strong's <#138> (haireomai); properly a choice, i.e. (special) a party or (abstract) disunion.
It is translated as "sect" (5 times) and "heresy" (4 times) in the KJV.

The instruction in Matthew is connected with Acts 1:8. Matthew adds these statements Jesus spoke on the Mount of Olives before He ascended and Luke adds these statements in his gospel, but Jesus spoke all these statements on the Mount before He ascended.

6 When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? 7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. 8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.
Acts 1:6–8.

These "Jews" are concerned about the restoration of the kingdom of Israel back to the people with King Jesus on the throne of David. But Jesus' program was on something else entirely and that is to have these disciples to herald the arrival and departure of Israel's Messiah and King to the twelve tribes scattered across the then-known world.
From the Mount of Olives Jerusalem is west, Judaea is south, Samaria is north, and the uttermost parts is east, or towards Babylon and the Orient. In other words, to the four cardinal points of the compass. That was their mission. To the twelve tribes scattered all over these places. The apostle to the "Jews" the apostle James writes to the twelve tribes:

1 JAMES, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting. James 1:1.

God promised a Redeemer in Genesis 3:15. God added to this promise of a Redeemer in Deuteronomy 18:18 that this Prophet like unto Moses was to come from among the twelve tribes (from their brethren.) Messiah came TO Israel as Promised and He taught Israel God's Word, and before He ascended, He sent His disciples to herald to the twelve tribes scattered abroad that their Messiah had come (and went.) That was their mission. TO the twelve tribes scattered abroad.

It was God's intention to let His people know that their Messiah had come and that their God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had kept His Promise. THAT'S what their mission was. They were not sent to the unbelieving Gentiles. They were sent to Covenant Israel.

You need to get yourself a Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Greek and Hebrew.
The Bible was written in Greek and Hebrew and using a modern-day dictionary will not work.
Start there.
Remember, Jesus Christ is a "Jewish" Messiah.
James was writing to the tribes scattered abroad.
Not all the writers were.

1 Cor 11:17-19
17But in giving this instruction, I do not praise you, because you come together not for the better but for the worse.
18For, in the first place, when you come together as a church, I hear that divisions exist among you; and in part I believe it.
19For there must also be factions among you, so that those who are approved may become evident among you.


I don't know what version you're using, but the NASB states the above.
 
Here W denies Paul wrote the word of God ,as if he was not inspired bt the Spirit.
YOU'RE IN THE THEOLOGY FORUM.
PLEASE FOLLOW THE TOS RULES.
YOUR STATEMENTS REQUIRE BIBLICAL SUPPORT.
PLEASE REPLY ONLY TO THE TOPIC.

ALSO, YOU'RE VERY CLOSE TO TROLLING AND THAT COULD GET YOU BANNED
FROM THIS THREAD.

PLEASE DO NOT RESPONS TO THIS POST IN THIS THREAD.

USE TALK WITH THE STAFF IF NECESSARY.
 
You've seen much evil J, so it has affected you a lot.
Most persons don't experience what you have.
I firmly believe man should not have to see what he sees in war-time.

Jesus did say that the road that leads to destruction is broad.
I see people and it's difficult to believe that they prefer evil...
and yet this is what the sin nature brings to humanity.
So we need to believe what we would prefer not to believe.



I'd say, as I have all throughout, that a JW and a Mormon do not believe what mainline Christianity believes even though they like to call themselves Christians.

However, it is God that will make the final decision.
As I've said, I believe that anyone that honors Him and worships Him and obeys Him will probably see Him in heaven, no matter what religion they are.

Jesus has thrown down the wall between Jews and Gentiles.
Yet you claim literally if a person believes in a great spirit and does good somehow according to God .let alone nature doesn't tell us what sin is .

Animals even dogs will kill their pups .seen it .a pig will do it ,chickens will peck their own to death .

Yet a he and Mormon can do exactly as you say .

Marry and never divorce .worship God as they know him ,don't lie ,cheat or etc and yet you think that if they are that good .problem is history has no examples of man being so good that he doesn't kill his brother to get something he wants.not even the American Indians .

The Cherokee of which jaci my granddaughter has animal stories to teach moral lessons ..that tribe wasnt a chump ,they like the apache at times would invade and take land.they pushed the creek out of Georgia into Alabama and into Florida .

Okechobee .big lake ,a snake was bored living in the marsh and so he slithered south ,then it rained and he began to circle and kept circling as the ran didn't stop and was covered in water .we know the lake as lake Okeechobee and the river as the Kissimmee .they say he is still at the bottom of that lake just waiting for it to dry and he will move on.

The Cherokee have a pantheon like the Seminoles . The rabbit jitsu ,the trickster ,he can take any form .you ,your child and he does so to steal from you or take you .

The Seminoles have a similar myth. Perhaps you should attend a pow wow and listen to these.its educational but also pagan.they do rain dances if the tribe does it .they also mix Catholicism with their faith .they openly admit it. That's usually the south western tribe .try meeting the Aztecs and asking them about the great spirit .

Eden was not in Africa or in the bible but in about where Chicago is.but the Aztecs rebelled and were cast out and all man came from that split off ,all American Indians ,not the white man .

If God is the great spirit then why would he lie to them ? That's so off .

Yet there can be sincere diets there.
 
Yet you claim literally if a person believes in a great spirit and does good somehow according to God .let alone nature doesn't tell us what sin is .

Animals even dogs will kill their pups .seen it .a pig will do it ,chickens will peck their own to death .

Yet a he and Mormon can do exactly as you say .

Marry and never divorce .worship God as they know him ,don't lie ,cheat or etc and yet you think that if they are that good .problem is history has no examples of man being so good that he doesn't kill his brother to get something he wants.not even the American Indians .

The Cherokee of which jaci my granddaughter has animal stories to teach moral lessons ..that tribe wasnt a chump ,they like the apache at times would invade and take land.they pushed the creek out of Georgia into Alabama and into Florida .

Okechobee .big lake ,a snake was bored living in the marsh and so he slithered south ,then it rained and he began to circle and kept circling as the ran didn't stop and was covered in water .we know the lake as lake Okeechobee and the river as the Kissimmee .they say he is still at the bottom of that lake just waiting for it to dry and he will move on.

The Cherokee have a pantheon like the Seminoles . The rabbit jitsu ,the trickster ,he can take any form .you ,your child and he does so to steal from you or take you .

The Seminoles have a similar myth. Perhaps you should attend a pow wow and listen to these.its educational but also pagan.they do rain dances if the tribe does it .they also mix Catholicism with their faith .they openly admit it. That's usually the south western tribe .try meeting the Aztecs and asking them about the great spirit .

Eden was not in Africa or in the bible but in about where Chicago is.but the Aztecs rebelled and were cast out and all man came from that split off ,all American Indians ,not the white man .

If God is the great spirit then why would he lie to them ? That's so off .

Yet there can be sincere diets there.
You forget something I said way back at the beginning....
It must be GOD, the Almighty God, creator of the universe.
Not some weird pagan god.
 
You forget something I said way back at the beginning....
It must be GOD, the Almighty God, creator of the universe.
Not some weird pagan god.
Unless God reveals himself ,

Peter couldn't see Jesus as the son of man unless it Father revealed it to him.

Peter knew the tanach .he was fluent in the knowing the Torah and the prophets .how so would be a gentile who never heard ?

My point here is many Jews then knowing the tanach deny Jesus and are damned when they died .they had the signs and the season in their writing to guide them .yet God had to open their eyes.
 
James was writing to the tribes scattered abroad.
Not all the writers were.
God's Redeemer was prophesied in Genesis 3:15.
God knew this Redeemer would come from one of the tribes of Jacob (later named Israel.)
In a few hundred years God made Abraham the recipient of the Trinitarian Covenant and Abraham was the founding of the "Jewish" race. The Abrahamic Covenant was Hebrew/"Jewish." (The identification of "Jewish" comes from the later tribe of Judah.)
The nation of Israel consisted originally of twelve tribes and later their offspring.
Israel went into slavery in Egypt.
Moses was called to deliver Israel.
Deuteronomy 18:18 Moses prophesied that God would send Israel's Messiah and King from 'among their brethren.'
The Law of Moses/God was the beginning of the Nation of Israel.
God promised Israel and David that one from his seed would sit on the throne of David.
Do you see the "Jewishness" of Israel's Messiah and King and Redeemer?
Messiah was born in a little town of Bethlehem as prophesied in Micah.
Jesus comes from a long family line of "Jews."
Jesus came to Israel.
Jesus healed, delivered, and taught the members of the twelve tribes living in and around Old Testament Israel (of northern and southern kingdoms.)
There was still centuries-old animosity between the ten northern tribes and the two southern tribes and Jesus taught Israel to love Israel (Matt. 5.) He never taught Covenant Israel to love anyone NON-Covenant (Gentiles.)
Jesus came to save and deliver Israel as prophesied many times in the Old Testament.
Jesus was sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel (NOT the lost sheep of the house of Gentiles.)
Moses wrote the Law TO and FOR Israel
The Psalms were written by those in Covenant with God TO and FOR Israel.
Prophets were sent by God TO and FOR Israel.
Messiah came and taught Israel.
The eleven apostles were sent to let the twelve tribes scattered abroad to let them know Messiah had come and God has kept His promises.
The gospels were written by believers in Covenant with God TO and FOR Covenant Israel.
The letters from Paul, Peter, James, Jude, John were written TO and FOR Israel but in time the Temple would be destroyed and the "ism" in "Judaism" would effectively come to an end and a new era would begin: The Times of the Gentiles in which God's promise to include Gentiles in His Covenant would begin.
The Lord's Prayer is a "Jewish" prayer for Israel for the Times of Jacob's Trouble when false prophet and antichrist would appear.
Revelation is an end-time prophecy TO and FOR Israel.
The Old Testament and the New Testament is "Jewish" in origin and is TO and FOR Israel.
Gentiles are being grafted in and need to be careful they don't think of themselves more highly than they ought, or God will cut them OFF!
Do you see the "Jewishness" of the Covenant God has made with His Chosen-apple of His eye-people called Israel?
1 Cor 11:17-19
17But in giving this instruction, I do not praise you, because you come together not for the better but for the worse.
18For, in the first place, when you come together as a church, I hear that divisions exist among you; and in part I believe it.
19For there must also be factions among you, so that those who are approved may become evident among you.


I don't know what version you're using, but the NASB states the above.
The NASB is wishy-washy when it comes to authenticity and accuracy. The NASB (1952) derives from the Greek texts which Westcott and Hort and their team developed from which all modern-day, new-age English translations come from.

Now, can you tell me what Paul is explaining in 1 Corinthians 11:17-19?
 
The true believers in the OT were the Sethian line, Noah, Enoch, and those in the Abrahamic Covenant, to name a few.
Without a Temple the God-fearers developed after the “Jews” returned from exile.
Being in the Mosaic Covenant and the Prophecy of a prophet like unto Moses those that trusted (had faith) in the promise were Christian and looked forward to their promise from their God.
The Syrophenecian woman, the Samaritan woman at the well, and the Roman centurion had great faith because they accepted Jesus as Israel’s promised Messiah/Christ and went to Him for their various needs. They were elect and Jesus healed/delivered/saved them. They walked by both sight and faith.

You are using the word "God-fearers" within a constricted definition of your making. I am using the term "God-fearers" as all those OT believers who truly believed God and walked with God by faith, from Abel onward. Not until Christ actually completed his mission on earth, being crucified for our sins, did the Apostles even understand the Gospel.

These OT God-fearers were not required to believe in the Messiah, nor did the OT prophets understand who the Messiah was, or what his mission actually was.

Many OT believers thought that the Christ only comes in victory, not as the dying servant, to save them from their oppressors. So, the OT believers, as well, did not have an accurate Gospel conception of who the Messiah was.

1 Peter 1:10-16 (NIV) 10 Concerning this salvation, the prophets, who spoke of the grace that was to come to {{{you,}}} searched intently and with the greatest care, 11 trying to find out the time and circumstances to which the Spirit of Christ in them was pointing when he predicted the sufferings of the Messiah and the glories that would follow. 12 It was revealed to them that they were not serving themselves {{{but you,}}} when they spoke of the things that have now been told {{{you}}} by those who have {{{preached the gospel to you}}} by the Holy Spirit sent from heaven. {{{Even angels long to look into these things.}}}
 
Last edited:
Hey everyone, I thought we needed some simple explanations on your topic.

I noticed Romans 2, needed to be explained a little.

Romans 2 speaks of escaping, ( or non escaping) of the righteous judgement of God, which is the goodness of God leading all men to repentance.

Seeking eternal life is the truth, and where is that truth but in the Son of God.

1 John 5 concludes for us of the record God gave us of HIs Son, to know that the Son of God came, ( not antichrist spirit that denies the Son of God has come in the flesh.) and gave us an understanding, ( giving the Spirit to know the things of God.) to be in Him that is true, even in the Son of God Jesus Christ, who is the ONLY true God and eternal life.


Romans 2:3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
4 Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness and forbearance and longsuffering; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance?
5 But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God;

Romans 2:7 To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life:
8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,

1 John 5:11 And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.

1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.
 
Back on explaining Romans 2, a little more.

The Gentiles Romans 2 speaks of, are the ones who are led by the goodness of God to repentance.

Denying and not confessing/acknowledging this, is denying the truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. ( that antichrist spirit)

It is told first in Acts 11, how the Spirit was given by gift to the Gentiles, as well as with the Jews, for believing on the Lord Jesus Christ, God had granted also to the Gentiles repentance unto life. (To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, eternal life. Romans 2:7. And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. 1 John 5:11.)

Then Romans 2 shows the nature of the Gentiles, with a conscience, to be judged by Jesus Christ according to the Gospel. ( Granted repentance to life/the goodness of God led them to repentance.)

Galatians 2 further explains, if they do not walk according to the truth of the Gospel, the Gentiles then cannot be compelled to live as the Jews, the Jews being by nature, to not be sinners of the Gentiles.

Those by nature, Jew or Gentile, as in Romans 2 first, then afterwards told about also in Galatians 2, know and confess that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, to believe in Jesus Christ ( granted repentance unto life/eternal life is in His Son.) to be justified by the faith of Jesus Christ, ( showing the works of the law written in their heart.) and not by works of the law or anything else in nature, which no flesh shall be jusified.



Acts 11:17 Forasmuch then as God gave them the like gift as he did unto us, who believed on the Lord Jesus Christ; what was I, that I could withstand God?
18 When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.

Romans 2:14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)
16 In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.

Galatians 214 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?
15 We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles,
16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
 
Back
Top