jesseedavis
Member
True or false:
The interpretation of evidence from the fossil record depends on the worldview of the interpreter.
The interpretation of evidence from the fossil record depends on the worldview of the interpreter.
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
The Bible is the evidence.True, none of this erases Darwin's four points, and Kurt Wise remains a YE creationist because he holds his interpretation of the Bible above the evidence, but it shows that we are not prisoners of our worldviews, unless we let ourselves be.
There is an objective reality, and humans, even with conflicting worldviews, can find it.
True, none of this erases Darwin's four points, and Kurt Wise remains a YE creationist because he holds his interpretation of the Bible above the evidence, but it shows that we are not prisoners of our worldviews, unless we let ourselves be.
I can agree with this, at least slightly. However I think we may differ on just what that "objective reality" is.
Side note: Barb, do you believe in Christ?
For now, the only thing I'll say on this is that in terms of historical sciences, evidence does not make any claims for itself nor does it tie itself to any other evidences. At the end of the day, the only "neutral" conclusion we can have is that a fossil is a fossil and man what a dirty one at that!
Orthodox Trinitarian Christian, huh? Okay, sounds good. Yes, I follow Christ.
What do I know of paleontology? Well, this depends on what way you want to look at it. Scientifically, nothing.
Well, before we delve into the depths of it, can we first start with some theology?
How do you reconcile your theistic Darwinism (an oxymoron) with the Darwinistic worldview of Will Provine
Is Provine a prisoner of his worldview?
That's good to know, but then, I look below, and you're questioning Christ's truthfulness. If you're a Christian, this shouldn't be an issue. I'm wondering why it is for you.
Sure. But you're setting yourself up, if you start suggesting that Christians don't think God is truthful.
because he holds his interpretation of the Bible above the evidence
Creationists believe God created - atheists deny God - you remain very confused scientifically and theologically and the truth remains - Charles Darwin understood perfectly that his version of evolutionism was/is atheism. You have had the wool pulled over your eyes. Wake up and learn from your error.As you learned, dogmatic atheists share an agenda with creationists to make science opposed to God. Provine is what is sometimes referred to as a fundy atheist. Not surprising to see an alliance between the two groups.
Again, your take on the truthfulness of God please?
Creationists believe God created
atheists deny God
you remain very confused scientifically and theologically and the truth remains - Charles Darwin understood perfectly that his version of evolutionism was/is atheism.
You have had the wool pulled over your eyes.
I've answered once already. If you can't accept that God is truth, you don't know much about Christianity.
So let's hear about you. Are you a Christian?
You still don't get it - Darwinian lore is not science - it is a godless woldview based on naturalism.As you learned, dogmatic atheists share an agenda with creationists to make science opposed to God.
Provine, like Dawkins is a militant atheist who understands evolution quite well...Provine is what is sometimes referred to as a fundy atheist.
Darwin rejected God and the faith of Christ long before he checked out. He was what he was - an agnostic atheist who knew well where his version of evolution went - straight to atheism. Try to move forward - you have been duped - Darwin has given atheism its own “creation” story and you appear to buy into that myth.And yet he suggested that God created the first living things. Doesn't that tell you there's something wrong with your assumption?
I believe He is Truth and that He cannot lie, I'm not questioning this.
You still don't get it
Darwinian lore is not science - it is a godless woldview based on naturalism.
Provine, like Dawkins is a militant atheist who understands evolution quite well...
Darwin rejected God and the faith of Christ long before he checked out.
Are you a Christian?
(declines to say)
Why do you not want to answer the question?
This seems to have a bit of harsh skepticism towards someone that you aren't paying a whole lot of attention to don't you think?would you tell us whether or not you claim to be a Christian?
Would you agree, even if He used allegory or figurative language to express the truth, it would still be the truth?
Honestly, after reading up on your posts, I figured you have ample intelligence to infer from the responses I did give you that I am indeed a Christian.
I do agree, He often does throughout His word. Care to expound on your thoughts behind this question?
You struggle - Darwinism is not science - Darwinism is atheism - I reject atheism and Darwinism - you try to embrace a form of Darwinism that is non-biblical and non-scientific.You and your atheist fellows want to keep science and God apart.
Darwin easily snookered you my friend - learn from your mistakes. Darwin's theory was never meant to be compatible with a Creator. Darwin's purpose from the get-go was to eliminate God and give atheism its own “creation myth".You're problem is Darwin attributing the origin of life to God, in The Origin of Species.