• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Who is Mystery Babylon ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter savedbygrace57
  • Start date Start date
AKJV we have one thing in common i love the sound of the KJB Lots of personal reasons.. And because i love it.... What scofield did to the KJB is IMHO just plain sinful. Here is a very important example.. The newer versions of scofield do not have this direct switch of scripture. This is not an error.but a deliberate exchange. Not sure if it is the 1917 but it is in the 1909. Some where close to page 1015.


[FONT=&quot]Mat [/FONT][FONT=&quot]13:30[/FONT][FONT=&quot] Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn. [/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]CIS says [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]1 The gathering of the tares into bundles for burning does not imply immediate judgment At the end of this age v 40 the tares are set apart for burning but first the wheat is gathered into the barn [/FONT]

CIS is correct, the tares are bundled for the fire, not bundled and thrown into the fire, the wheat is gathered at the second coming and moved directly into the barn, we are raised incorruptible and move directly into the spiritual body as Jesus was raised in and are forever with the Lord.Amen.
After the thousand years in our spiritual bodies and a short while, the bundles are then thrown into the fire, all of them:
Rev 20:11-15 is the bundles going into the fire, the last cast into the fire is Death.

Grace to you, peace from God and the Lord Jesus Christ.
 
MOD HAT ON.. this Scofield stuff is off topic. :backtotopic
 
Thanks Reba for the CIS information, you will be glad to hear that i have never read a Schofield Bible.

About Mystery Babylon, after reading these posts on here, and listening to respected teachers, i'm still convinced that it is the Roman Catholic Church in the physical form. But it is also a spiritual wickedness too. Since the RCC only came about after 300AD, and Revelation was written about 100AD. The Mystery Babylon is Rome in Revelation and then the RCC took Rome's place as being Mystery Babylon. Since there is still paganism in the RCC.
 
jerusalem fits that far more then the rcc.

i need to look more into that but . not all of that as a far as babylon has fallen is from jerusalem or was done in ad 70.
 
Re: Who is Mystery Babylon ?
AKJ.. said:
Thanks Reba for the CIS information, you will be glad to hear that i have never read a Schofield Bible.

About Mystery Babylon, after reading these posts on here, and listening to respected teachers, i'm still convinced that it is the Roman Catholic Church in the physical form. But it is also a spiritual wickedness too. Since the RCC only came about after 300AD, and Revelation was written about 100AD. The Mystery Babylon is Rome in Revelation and then the RCC took Rome's place as being Mystery Babylon. Since there is still paganism in the RCC.



jerusalem fits that far more then the rcc.

i need to look more into that but . not all of that as a far as babylon has fallen is from jerusalem or was done in ad 70.


Where in the Word of God (or history) do you find Jerusalem being the mother of harlots?? Rev. 17:1-5 Only rome can have that claim! Along with the abomination of the earth.
Israel were as a whole, Christ/less, yet the Virgin doctrines were not the issue! Isa. 5:1-4

--Elijah
 
Re: Who is Mystery Babylon ?
AKJ.. said:
Thanks Reba for the CIS information, you will be glad to hear that i have never read a Schofield Bible.

About Mystery Babylon, after reading these posts on here, and listening to respected teachers, i'm still convinced that it is the Roman Catholic Church in the physical form. But it is also a spiritual wickedness too. Since the RCC only came about after 300AD, and Revelation was written about 100AD. The Mystery Babylon is Rome in Revelation and then the RCC took Rome's place as being Mystery Babylon. Since there is still paganism in the RCC.


Where in the Word of God (or history) do you find Jerusalem being the mother of harlots?? Rev. 17:1-5 Only rome can have that claim! Along with the abomination of the earth.
Israel were as a whole, Christ/less, yet the Virgin doctrines were not the issue! Isa. 5:1-4

--Elijah


ah yes the ever the rcc being told that they are harlot yet they put the bible together for us to read and call them a harlot.is that something the harlots do?

did they kill the saints? yes along with protestants and all the rest. the sda isnt execpt either for if dig i can find that group a sinnin too. who was killing the saints in the day of John? was it rome? or jerusalem? the later did it the most. now then i didnt say that i was too sure on this as theres more to it then that but the jews of that day fit the bill quite well.

and i can show where modern judaism has borrowed from other faiths. ie they believe in reincarnation and also are new age in some ways in that the kaballah teaches God is a mystery force where he is in all and can be worshipped in trees and fellow man. hmm or where many jews accept that God has many ways to be reached despite what the torah says.
 
About Mystery Babylon, after reading these posts on here, and listening to respected teachers, i'm still convinced that it is the Roman Catholic Church in the physical form. But it is also a spiritual wickedness too. Since the RCC only came about after 300AD, and Revelation was written about 100AD. The Mystery Babylon is Rome in Revelation and then the RCC took Rome's place as being Mystery Babylon. Since there is still paganism in the RCC.

Where is your historical evidence that the "Roman Catholic Church" came into being in 300 AD??? This idea stems from nonsense, not actual history...

Let me try to put this total disregard for history into perspective... Some thinking would be useful here. :chin

Ok, Christians were being persecuted by the Roman Empire, quite savagely only a few years shy of the Edict of Milan (325), which allowed Christians to freely worship legally. An amazing thing, frankly - that only some ten years separated the worst persecutions suffered by the early Church from this legal statement from the emperor, Constantine. These same Christians, being tossed to the lions for refusing to give a pinch of incense to the Emperor and for meeting in private to celebrate the Eucharist and "praise this man Jesus as if He was a God" - NOW, in 325, were given free right to worship freely, suddenly blew away in the wind when the "big bad RCC" came into existence.

You hear nothing of these former Christians, not a word. For some strange reason, these Christians from before the Edict of Milan suddenly no longer exist :screwloose. Somehow, the peaceful takeover by the "RCC" has completely eliminated what 300 years of intermittent and often harsh persecution by Rome could not do. What an amazingly silly proposition...

Is this sinking in - how silly an idea to presume that the Church of the first three centuries - men who willingly went to the LIONS, for heavens sake, just suddenly and without any discussion or fight gave up against the "RCC", said NOTHING about all these supposed 'pagan practices' that they had just so recently DIED TO DEFEND??? Ten years ago, they were being torn to shreds by lions, and now, they say absolutely nothing about even worse accusastions, worse blasphemies from a supposed "Christians" religion pretending to be the Church of Christ???

Yea, just a bit of thought should put this false history to rest. The same Christians persecuted in 300 AD, 310 AD, 315 AD, were the same Christians who were suddenly given freedom to worship in 325 AD, and continued to worship openly in 400 AD, 500 AD, and so forth. The Church of before the Edict of Milan was the exact same Church with the exact same beliefs as after the Edict of Milan. There can be no doubt of that - history gives us no indication of such a inter-Christian struggle during this era. The Arian discussion is nothing compared to what you propose.

The Church of 315 AD believed the exact same things as the Church of 325 AD. To state that the "RCC came into being in 300 AD" is to make an amazingly ridiculous statement that totally ignores the fact that it would require the Church predating Milan to just "blow away" into oblivion - something that Jesus Christ promised could never happen.

People who make such statements apparently do not think Christ could back up His statements, nor do can they explain the sudden and total disappearance of the Christian Church before the Edict of Milan that the Catholic Church so conveniently "took over" for...

Clearly, the Catholic Church is the same Church before and after the Edict of Milan. There is no "other" Christian Church persecuted by Rome and then given freedom to worship. This Christian Church prior to 325 CERTAINLY did not falter and fall apart after given the ability to lawfully meet and worship!

Pure invention for those who choose not to stop and use common sense...

Regards
 
Only rome can have that claim! Along with the abomination of the earth.


You talking about the Christians Paul wrote to in 60 AD, Christian Romans whom Paul HIMSELF tells us were recognized for their faith throughout the world???

Clearly, "Rome" refers to the powers of the world, secular culture represented by the empire of the time that "covered the world", not the Christians in Rome! Secular "Rome" - those who do not follow God - are the abomination of the earth, not Christians located in Rome!!! :screwloose
 
[/SIZE]

You talking about the Christians Paul wrote to in 60 AD, Christian Romans whom Paul HIMSELF tells us were recognized for their faith throughout the world???

Clearly, "Rome" refers to the powers of the world, secular culture represented by the empire of the time that "covered the world", not the Christians in Rome! Secular "Rome" - those who do not follow God - are the abomination of the earth, not Christians located in Rome!!! :screwloose

Naw, go back & get updated to your 'brothers' postings! You are way behind them.:screwloose But before long you will 'see' that your message is to be now SHIFTED AGAIN TELLING the ex/protestants of rome to NOT LEAVE THEIR [ROME INFESTED CHURCH"S!] but to stay [IN THEM]! (and why?)
Forum: Take a guess who has again taken over these Rev. 17:1-5 ABOMINATION OF THE EARTH ONES?

--Elijah
 
Naw, go back & get updated to your 'brothers' postings! You are way behind them.:screwloose



I am not addressing my "brother's postings", just your silly one... :screwloose

But before long you will 'see' that your message is to be now SHIFTED AGAIN TELLING the ex/protestants of rome to NOT LEAVE THEIR [ROME INFESTED CHURCH"S!] but to stay [IN THEM]! (and why?)


Forum: Take a guess who has again taken over these Rev. 17:1-5 ABOMINATION OF THE EARTH ONES?


You are confused - as your posts show. You are merely doing the work of Satan by fomenting discord WITHIN the Body of Christ. What does Paul tell the Corinthians about those who do such things - see 1 Cor 3:17...

No organization has "taken over" anything. The same abomination that John was writing about has ALWAYS existed, ever since the sin of Adam. John was not speaking of a future "church" or some battle between Christian churches, but of those who sin against God and do not choose His ways.

The battle is not against various Christian churches, as much as you desperately want to make it, but is a battle between Satan and those who believe in God and follow His commandments - the Church - as Rev 12 clearly points out. This obviously includes the Roman Christians that Paul writes to. HE HIMSELF vouches for this fact by honoring their faith in words that you STILL choose to ignore. :screwloose

As comic and colorful as your posts are, they are full of misunderstandings on what exactly John is saying. The theme is very basic - and why the Catholics place it as the finale of the Bible.

Follow God and gain eternal life. Follow the ways of the world, of Satan, and be condemned. "Come out of her" refers to come out of the ways of the world, in which we are all born into...

NOT come out of the Body of Christ :grumpy
 
Y'all perceive the childbirth symbolism inherent in "Come out of her" don'cha?:chin
 
i never looked at it that way since my conversion from jw thinking but that makes more sense.

lol. if the rcc was corrupted since the 300's ad how in the world does the bible remain pure as both st. jerome and st.agustine produced two types of bibles one with the apochyphra and the other wasnt. we protestant take the cues from jerome but if both were catholics and catholics are bad and satanic. what makes you think the bible is inerrant?
 
i never looked at it that way since my conversion from jw thinking but that makes more sense.

lol. if the rcc was corrupted since the 300's ad how in the world does the bible remain pure as both st. jerome and st.agustine produced two types of bibles one with the apochyphra and the other wasnt. we protestant take the cues from jerome but if both were catholics and catholics are bad and satanic. what makes you think the bible is inerrant?

The "RCC was corrupt" is simply polemic statements invented by people who know nothing about history, nor can they make any common sense argument on... "what happened to the 'real' Church after the Edict of Milan - with nary a word against this 'corrupt RCC'"?

We find the Church going to the lions to state their absolute belief in the purity of the religion given to them by the Apostles as per Christ's command - but not even a wimper when the "corrupt RCC" injects paganism during times of peace and no persecution????

:biglol :biglol:biglol

Apparently the art of thinking is lost among some people...
 
Where is your historical evidence that the "Roman Catholic Church" came into being in 300 AD??? This idea stems from nonsense, not actual history...

Let me try to put this total disregard for history into perspective... Some thinking would be useful here. :chin

Ok, Christians were being persecuted by the Roman Empire, quite savagely only a few years shy of the Edict of Milan (325), which allowed Christians to freely worship legally. An amazing thing, frankly - that only some ten years separated the worst persecutions suffered by the early Church from this legal statement from the emperor, Constantine. These same Christians, being tossed to the lions for refusing to give a pinch of incense to the Emperor and for meeting in private to celebrate the Eucharist and "praise this man Jesus as if He was a God" - NOW, in 325, were given free right to worship freely, suddenly blew away in the wind when the "big bad RCC" came into existence.

You hear nothing of these former Christians, not a word. For some strange reason, these Christians from before the Edict of Milan suddenly no longer exist :screwloose. Somehow, the peaceful takeover by the "RCC" has completely eliminated what 300 years of intermittent and often harsh persecution by Rome could not do. What an amazingly silly proposition...

Is this sinking in - how silly an idea to presume that the Church of the first three centuries - men who willingly went to the LIONS, for heavens sake, just suddenly and without any discussion or fight gave up against the "RCC", said NOTHING about all these supposed 'pagan practices' that they had just so recently DIED TO DEFEND??? Ten years ago, they were being torn to shreds by lions, and now, they say absolutely nothing about even worse accusastions, worse blasphemies from a supposed "Christians" religion pretending to be the Church of Christ???

Yea, just a bit of thought should put this false history to rest. The same Christians persecuted in 300 AD, 310 AD, 315 AD, were the same Christians who were suddenly given freedom to worship in 325 AD, and continued to worship openly in 400 AD, 500 AD, and so forth. The Church of before the Edict of Milan was the exact same Church with the exact same beliefs as after the Edict of Milan. There can be no doubt of that - history gives us no indication of such a inter-Christian struggle during this era. The Arian discussion is nothing compared to what you propose.

The Church of 315 AD believed the exact same things as the Church of 325 AD. To state that the "RCC came into being in 300 AD" is to make an amazingly ridiculous statement that totally ignores the fact that it would require the Church predating Milan to just "blow away" into oblivion - something that Jesus Christ promised could never happen.

People who make such statements apparently do not think Christ could back up His statements, nor do can they explain the sudden and total disappearance of the Christian Church before the Edict of Milan that the Catholic Church so conveniently "took over" for...

Clearly, the Catholic Church is the same Church before and after the Edict of Milan. There is no "other" Christian Church persecuted by Rome and then given freedom to worship. This Christian Church prior to 325 CERTAINLY did not falter and fall apart after given the ability to lawfully meet and worship!

Pure invention for those who choose not to stop and use common sense...

Regards

Just more Jer. 17:5 Arm of Flesh stuff. And Christian?? Come on, WAKE UP! Read of the thousands leaving.
The CHRISTIANS ARE 'LEAVING' the present + past/tense apostate Rev. 17:1-5 . (as documented in Rev. 18:4)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just more Jer. 17:5 Arm of Flesh stuff. And Christian?? Come on, WAKE UP! Read of the thousands leaving.
The CHRISTIANS ARE 'LEAVING' the present + past/tense apostate Rev. 17:1-5 . (as documented in Rev. 18:4)

Elijah I have removed some of the wording in your post. Your hateful speech must stop. The words used matter and yours have once again become rude and extremely impolite.
I am sure you can find better ways to convey your thoughts.
reba
 
Just more Jer. 17:5 Arm of Flesh stuff. And Christian?? Come on, WAKE UP! Read of the thousands leaving.
The CHRISTIANS ARE 'LEAVING' the present + past/tense apostate Rev. 17:1-5 . (as documented in Rev. 18:4)

Sorry, Rev 17 has nothing to do with "apostate Christians". This is just more fomenting discord within the Body. Verse 6 makes it clear that the group discussed in 1-5 are opposed to the saints and martyrs of Jesus, the Church, such men as Ignatius, the Bishop of the Catholic community of Antioch, a man who sat with John and heard him preach!!! Rev 17:1-5 speaks of "kings of the earth" who "NOW" follow the harlot. They COMMITTED fornication, past tense... HOW could this refer to the Church, when NO KING followed the ragged band of Christians in 100 AD???? Get serious... :screwloose

During the days of John, it was the Roman Empire, an empire well known for killing Christians, an empire that fostered the ways of the world, following Satan. It was with the EMPIRE that "kings of the earth" followed. This is simple history, here, folks... The Catholic Church had absolutely no political power in 100 AD. Only the Roman Empire fits the bill.

I already explained Rev 18:4 and has absolutely nothing to do with 'coming out of the Church'. Why would John, writing to Christians, tell them to "come out of the Church"? That is lunacy.

God is calling His People to stop sinning. The "letters" to the seven churches makes this clear, their issues and their problems, the temptations that they faced. It is a call for Christians to stiffen their resolve, hold out to the end and resist the Tempter, who prowls like a lion in search of prey, even among the sheepfold.

We are ALL born into sin. Born into the ways of the world. We are told to "come out of her". Be born from above and follow the ways of God, rather than of the "empires of the time", the Rome of 100 AD. Secularism, hedonism, individualism, materialism. These things keep us from following God. Following these 'isms' means we are 'mating' with the harlot. Even Christians who do these things. One cannot worship the harlot and God. Christians of every age are faced with these temptations. No doubt you have heard of the "health and wealth" Gospel. Christians of every age must resist the "harlot" of the age, things that pull us from God. This includes materialism and relativism that tempts Christians of the 21st century to think they can please God and man at the same time.

John's message is simple. It is not the sinister message you propose, where one part of the Body fights with another. :nono2 Clearly, causing divisiveness and discord - destroying the Body, has drastic consequences. Paul says they will be destroyed. Be careful of your interpretations, as many have been destroyed by them. (2 Peter)

Regards
 
Sorry, Rev 17 has nothing to do with "apostate Christians". This is just more fomenting discord within the Body. Verse 6 makes it clear that the group discussed in 1-5 are opposed to the saints and martyrs of Jesus, the Church, such men as Ignatius, the Bishop of the Catholic community of Antioch, a man who sat with John and heard him preach!!! Rev 17:1-5 speaks of "kings of the earth" who "NOW" follow the harlot. They COMMITTED fornication, past tense... HOW could this refer to the Church, when NO KING followed the ragged band of Christians in 100 AD???? Get serious... :screwloose

During the days of John, it was the Roman Empire, an empire well known for killing Christians, an empire that fostered the ways of the world, following Satan. It was with the EMPIRE that "kings of the earth" followed. This is simple history, here, folks... The Catholic Church had absolutely no political power in 100 AD. Only the Roman Empire fits the bill.

I already explained Rev 18:4 and has absolutely nothing to do with 'coming out of the Church'. Why would John, writing to Christians, tell them to "come out of the Church"? That is lunacy.

God is calling His People to stop sinning. The "letters" to the seven churches makes this clear, their issues and their problems, the temptations that they faced. It is a call for Christians to stiffen their resolve, hold out to the end and resist the Tempter, who prowls like a lion in search of prey, even among the sheepfold.

We are ALL born into sin. Born into the ways of the world. We are told to "come out of her". Be born from above and follow the ways of God, rather than of the "empires of the time", the Rome of 100 AD. Secularism, hedonism, individualism, materialism. These things keep us from following God. Following these 'isms' means we are 'mating' with the harlot. Even Christians who do these things. One cannot worship the harlot and God. Christians of every age are faced with these temptations. No doubt you have heard of the "health and wealth" Gospel. Christians of every age must resist the "harlot" of the age, things that pull us from God. This includes materialism and relativism that tempts Christians of the 21st century to think they can please God and man at the same time.

John's message is simple. It is not the sinister message you propose, where one part of the Body fights with another. :nono2 Clearly, causing divisiveness and discord - destroying the Body, has drastic consequences. Paul says they will be destroyed. Be careful of your interpretations, as many have been destroyed by them. (2 Peter)

Regards

Couple of things real quick:

Revelation wasn't written in 96AD. It was written between 65 and 68AD, probably closer to 68AD.

The scarlet beast upon which the woman sits is Rome. The woman herself is Jerusalem and the apostate priesthood which boldly pronounced to Pilate at Christ's trial, "We have no king but Caesar!"

Look at the language used to describe the harlot: it can all be found in the OT. But there is no more compelling evidence for her than this:

{24} "And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all who have been slain on the earth." Revelation 18:24 (NASB)
This is a direct reference to Matthew 23:

{34} "Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, {35} so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. {36} "Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation. {37} "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling. {38} "Behold, your house is being left to you desolate! Matthew 23:34-38 (NASB)

There is no other city in the Bible as notorious for killing those God sent to her than Jerusalem. None.

Hope this helps.
 
Re: Who is Mystery Babylon ?
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by francisdesales
Sorry, Rev 17 has nothing to do with "apostate Christians". This is just more fomenting discord within the Body. Verse 6 makes it clear that the group discussed in 1-5 are opposed to the saints and martyrs of Jesus, the Church, such men as Ignatius, the Bishop of the Catholic community of Antioch, a man who sat with John and heard him preach!!! Rev 17:1-5 speaks of "kings of the earth" who "NOW" follow the harlot. They COMMITTED fornication, past tense... HOW could this refer to the Church, when NO KING followed the ragged band of Christians in 100 AD???? Get serious... :screwloose

During the days of John, it was the Roman Empire, an empire well known for killing Christians, an empire that fostered the ways of the world, following Satan. It was with the EMPIRE that "kings of the earth" followed. This is simple history, here, folks... The Catholic Church had absolutely no political power in 100 AD. Only the Roman Empire fits the bill.

I already explained Rev 18:4 and has absolutely nothing to do with 'coming out of the Church'. Why would John, writing to Christians, tell them to "come out of the Church"? That is lunacy.

God is calling His People to stop sinning. The "letters" to the seven churches makes this clear, their issues and their problems, the temptations that they faced. It is a call for Christians to stiffen their resolve, hold out to the end and resist the Tempter, who prowls like a lion in search of prey, even among the sheepfold.

We are ALL born into sin. Born into the ways of the world. We are told to "come out of her". Be born from above and follow the ways of God, rather than of the "empires of the time", the Rome of 100 AD. Secularism, hedonism, individualism, materialism. These things keep us from following God. Following these 'isms' means we are 'mating' with the harlot. Even Christians who do these things. One cannot worship the harlot and God. Christians of every age are faced with these temptations. No doubt you have heard of the "health and wealth" Gospel. Christians of every age must resist the "harlot" of the age, things that pull us from God. This includes materialism and relativism that tempts Christians of the 21st century to think they can please God and man at the same time.

John's message is simple. It is not the sinister message you propose, where one part of the Body fights with another. :nono2 Clearly, causing divisiveness and discord - destroying the Body, has drastic consequences. Paul says they will be destroyed. Be careful of your interpretations, as many have been destroyed by them. (2 Peter)

Regards



Couple of things real quick: (by storm)

Revelation wasn't written in 96AD. It was written between 65 and 68AD, probably closer to 68AD.

The scarlet beast upon which the woman sits is Rome. The woman herself is Jerusalem and the apostate priesthood which boldly pronounced to Pilate at Christ's trial, "We have no king but Caesar!"

Look at the language used to describe the harlot: it can all be found in the OT. But there is no more compelling evidence for her than this:


{24} "And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all who have been slain on the earth." Revelation 18:24 (NASB)


This is a direct reference to Matthew 23:


{34} "Therefore, behold, I am sending you prophets and wise men and scribes; some of them you will kill and crucify, and some of them you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city, {35} so that upon you may fall the guilt of all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah, the son of Berechiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar. {36} "Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation. {37} "Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling. {38} "Behold, your house is being left to you desolate! Matthew 23:34-38 (NASB)


There is no other city in the Bible as notorious for killing those God sent to her than Jerusalem. None.

Hope this helps.

Just more of romes jesuite stuff! Are you in membership?;)
--Elijah
 
Just more of romes jesuite stuff! Are you in membership?;)
--Elijah

2_72.jpg


Self identified 'Christians' hating other Christians.:nono2

Mar 3:24 - And if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand.
 
Back
Top