I
Imagican
Guest
Packrat,
I have NOTHING against the 'word trinity'. It is the 'doctrine' of 'trinity' that I shun from. If you 'truly' understood it, you TOO would avoid it.
You, like MOST others that I have encountered in this discussion, have simply ACCEPTED something that, admittedly, even THESE are unable to fully understand. And at the expense of altering scripture in order to accept it.
By 'altering', I offer THIS as example. There is NO; God The Son offered in scripture. There is NO 'trinity' offered in scripture. There are NO 'three persons' offered in scripture.
These are THREE meager examples of the myriad that one could list.
Couple the 'altering of scripture' with the historic 'creation' of this 'doctrine' and it becomes IMMEDIATELY apparent that it is NOT Biblical.
We have been offered LITTLE so far as The Written Word is concerned. A diligent reader could read the ENTIRE Bible in just a matter of three days or so. Even a SLOW reader could read it in a couple of weeks. So, we have a VERY limited amount of the Written Word.
To alter what LITTLE we have in favor of a 'man-made' doctrine is ludicrous. We HAVE been given The Word as a means of discernment and EVEN THEN there are those that would choose to follow the 'teachings of men' rather than the Word of God. I guess, for MOST, it's simply EASIER this way.
But I will offer once again, IF no one had EVER mentioned 'trinity' to you, YOU would NOT EVEN KNOW THE WORD. For IF you simply relied upon the Written Word and the Holy Spirit as guide, there is NO 'trinity' WITHOUT it being 'taught' to an individual by ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL.
I believe that Mark has made monumental efforts to humbly offer that HE TOO understands that REGARDLESS of the relationship with Father and Son there is NO "TRINITY" in The Word.
I have NEVER denied the deity that IS Christ Jesus. Being the Son He is INHERENT of God. But, when we HAVE the words of the Son Himself offering that He offered NOTHING of His own but that which was given Him of God, I don't understand HOW one could DENY the VERY WORDS of the ONE they claim to 'worship'.
Christ IS the ONLY Begotten Son of God. NOT ONCE in the entire Bible is it written by ANYONE that an individual MUST accept the 'concept of trinity' in order to receive the 'gift offered'. NOT ONCE.
Yet I have CONTINUALLY been BOMBARDED, (as well as other that deny 'trinity'), with 'supposed' Christians TELLING me that I MUST accept 'trinity' or I CANNOT KNOW God OR His Son. Hmmmm............ What kind of 'doctrine' is this? One that would teach AGAINST The Word that offers that there is NOT A SINGLE MAN ON THIS PLANET THAT IS CAPABLE OF JUDGING SUCH MATTERS?
So, if it's 'trinity' that you CHOOSE to follow, ALL I am here offering is that YOU TOO have The Word at your disposal. IF you 'choose' to ignore The Word in favor of 'words of men' then that is CERTAINLY 'your choice' to make. I have simply offered that 'trinity' IS 'man-made' theology that is NOT backed up IN The Word or BY The Word except by those that 'choose' to 'see' it. And the ONLY WAY one is even GIVEN THE CHOICE is through the 'teachings of men' rather than The Holy Bible.
MEC
I have NOTHING against the 'word trinity'. It is the 'doctrine' of 'trinity' that I shun from. If you 'truly' understood it, you TOO would avoid it.
You, like MOST others that I have encountered in this discussion, have simply ACCEPTED something that, admittedly, even THESE are unable to fully understand. And at the expense of altering scripture in order to accept it.
By 'altering', I offer THIS as example. There is NO; God The Son offered in scripture. There is NO 'trinity' offered in scripture. There are NO 'three persons' offered in scripture.
These are THREE meager examples of the myriad that one could list.
Couple the 'altering of scripture' with the historic 'creation' of this 'doctrine' and it becomes IMMEDIATELY apparent that it is NOT Biblical.
We have been offered LITTLE so far as The Written Word is concerned. A diligent reader could read the ENTIRE Bible in just a matter of three days or so. Even a SLOW reader could read it in a couple of weeks. So, we have a VERY limited amount of the Written Word.
To alter what LITTLE we have in favor of a 'man-made' doctrine is ludicrous. We HAVE been given The Word as a means of discernment and EVEN THEN there are those that would choose to follow the 'teachings of men' rather than the Word of God. I guess, for MOST, it's simply EASIER this way.
But I will offer once again, IF no one had EVER mentioned 'trinity' to you, YOU would NOT EVEN KNOW THE WORD. For IF you simply relied upon the Written Word and the Holy Spirit as guide, there is NO 'trinity' WITHOUT it being 'taught' to an individual by ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL.
I believe that Mark has made monumental efforts to humbly offer that HE TOO understands that REGARDLESS of the relationship with Father and Son there is NO "TRINITY" in The Word.
I have NEVER denied the deity that IS Christ Jesus. Being the Son He is INHERENT of God. But, when we HAVE the words of the Son Himself offering that He offered NOTHING of His own but that which was given Him of God, I don't understand HOW one could DENY the VERY WORDS of the ONE they claim to 'worship'.
Christ IS the ONLY Begotten Son of God. NOT ONCE in the entire Bible is it written by ANYONE that an individual MUST accept the 'concept of trinity' in order to receive the 'gift offered'. NOT ONCE.
Yet I have CONTINUALLY been BOMBARDED, (as well as other that deny 'trinity'), with 'supposed' Christians TELLING me that I MUST accept 'trinity' or I CANNOT KNOW God OR His Son. Hmmmm............ What kind of 'doctrine' is this? One that would teach AGAINST The Word that offers that there is NOT A SINGLE MAN ON THIS PLANET THAT IS CAPABLE OF JUDGING SUCH MATTERS?
So, if it's 'trinity' that you CHOOSE to follow, ALL I am here offering is that YOU TOO have The Word at your disposal. IF you 'choose' to ignore The Word in favor of 'words of men' then that is CERTAINLY 'your choice' to make. I have simply offered that 'trinity' IS 'man-made' theology that is NOT backed up IN The Word or BY The Word except by those that 'choose' to 'see' it. And the ONLY WAY one is even GIVEN THE CHOICE is through the 'teachings of men' rather than The Holy Bible.
MEC