Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
These are the semantics. To be precise you are saying there are two options placed in front of a person when the Gospel is presented, either to believe or not believe. In that sense you are correct. However anyone who doesn't believe in the Gospel does not do so via a freewill. Morally speaking there is no such thing. Nor does anyone believe via a freewill. John 1:13.....1 Corinthians 12:3...... 1 Corinthians 27-28. The Gospel is not about the ability to choose but is rather an issue of grace through faith. Ephesians 2:8-9. 2 Corinthians 4:4.We all have a choice to come to Christ and believe the Gospel, or continue to live in sin.
John 3:17.And this is the condemnation, that the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
John 3:19
People have a choice, but they choose darkness, because they love darkness rather than light.
1John 3:
9 No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.
10 This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God; nor is anyone who does not love his brother.
What does verse 9 means? Just for starters, the fact that verse 10 indicates that verse 9 is something visible, even measurable to the point of distinguishing children of God from children of the devil eliminates interpretations like this is referring to something merely internal to those born of God.
Nor is it referring to perfect behavior, as 1John 2:1;1:8,10; not to mention Gal 5:17 all indicate those born of God will sin from time to time.
What I find interesting about 1John is that in the Greek whenever John is referring to lifestyle he uses the present tense. And whenever John is referring to a snapshot event, or a behavior uncharacteristic of the person, he uses the aorist (which we don't have in English and so you lose something in the translation).
In this case John is saying that sinning is uncharacteristic of those born of God, not denying that it doesn't occur uncharactertically from time to time. Those born of God don't live a lifestyle of sin. And this is a distinguishing mark of those born of God. Thus when Paul says, "Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God." 1Cor 6:9,10 it is not that salvation is contingent upon one's behavior, but rather that there simply doesn't exists any such person who lives a lifestyle of sin who has been born of God.
Hello. I simply wanted to say, I never heard it put this way before. "God gave us a new man, He did not change the old man".Hi bsbcr The spiritual understanding that the born again do not PRACTICE sin. God gave us a new man, He did not change the old man and they are in conflict with each other so that we do not always do what we. (Gal. 5:16-18). Paul describes his struggle in (Rom. 7:15-25; this is the struggle between the old Saul and the new man Paul). And here is the result of being born again of the Spirit (Rom. 8:1-2). 1 John 3:10 is saying the same thing for those who are born again.
In Christ
Douglas Summers
But John said the person who sins (sins from their sin nature despite their 'born again' nature, as you say) is not of God:The statement about "cannot go on sinning" refers to the fact that the believer cannot sin from his new nature. The believer continues to sin from his human nature, the "old man", the flesh.
Prior to this, John tells the church to " let that abide in you which you heard from the beginning. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father." (1 John 2:24 NASB)The phrase "born of God" refers to regeneration, which creates a "new creature" per 2 Cor 5:17. This is repeated by the phrase "God's seed remains in him". iow, once born again, God's seed, the new man, remains in the one who believes.
You're talking about faith right? But it takes God's Word abiding in someone to believe in. That's what I take this scripture to mean. It's all about knowing Christ and His Personification of God. I don't think this is a warning. I think it's an affirmation.The abiding is up to us. We ultimately decide if God's word, the agent of born again transformation (James 1:18 NASB) continues to abide in us or not. It only abides forever in us if we let it. Thus the warning to let it do that. No abiding means no born again transformation. John says no born again transformation (righteous living) means, as I've shown, that you do not have eternal life.
Correct. Their actions are not of or from God.But John said the person who sins (sins from their sin nature despite their 'born again' nature, as you say) is not of God:
"anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother." (1 John 3:10 NASB)
And in case you want to define 'not of God' to mean simply not presently operating in the new nature the believer has, John shows us it means that person is not born again and does not have eternal life:
14 We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death. 15 Everyone who hates his brother is a murderer; and you know that no * murderer has eternal life abiding in him." (1 John 3:14 NASB)
Prior to this, John tells the church to
" let that abide in you which you heard from the beginning. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father." (1 John 2:24 NASB)
Absolutely correct! Which has nothing to do with maintaining our salvation. We must maintain our FELLOWSHIP with Christ.The abiding is up to us.
The warning has nothing to do with our born again transformation. It's all about FELLOWSHIP. Not relationship. John made that clear enough.We ultimately decide if God's word, the agent of born again transformation (James 1:18 NASB) continues to abide in us or not. It only abides forever in us if we let it. Thus the warning to let it do that.
No abiding means no born again transformation.
I disagree, because John began his epistle with emphasis on FELLOWSHIP, not relationship. But for those who see no difference between the 2 will just not understand this. Further, the Bible is crystal clear that eternal life is a gift of God from Rom 6:23, along with justification in Rom 3:24 and 5:15,16,17. After 6:23, the very NEXT USE of 'gift' is found in Rom 11:29, where Paul stated that God's gifts are irrevocable. The ONLY WAY to know what Paul meant by 'gift' in 11:29 is to see how he defined it prior to that verse. And we find that he was referring to both justification and eternal life.
So any claim that 1 John 3 is about loss of eternal life simply misunderstands what John was referring to.
All statements about "abiding" have to do with FELLOWSHIP, not relationship. The difference is huge.
[...]
All statements about "abiding" have to do with FELLOWSHIP, not relationship. The difference is huge.
These are the semantics. To be precise you are saying there are two options placed in front of a person when the Gospel is presented, either to believe or not believe. In that sense you are correct. However anyone who doesn't believe in the Gospel does not do so via a freewill. Morally speaking there is no such thing. Nor does anyone believe via a freewill. John 1:13.....1 Corinthians 12:3...... 1 Corinthians 27-28. The Gospel is not about the ability to choose but is rather an issue of grace through faith. Ephesians 2:8-9. 2 Corinthians 4:4.
Can somebody summarize the current issue here for me?
The Apostle John does an excellent job in drawing us in to the Divine Paradox.
I prefer the KJV rendering of the particular verse in question, rather than the paraphrased version used in the opening post where "continuing" is added. The KJV is much more precise:
1 John 3:
9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
And it's even more precise, here, from the same chapter:
6 Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
These deployments are impossible to understand without understanding that simultaneous but opposing truths or facts are deployed in the scriptures.
Opposing but simultaneously existing truths are known as paradoxes.
The Divine Paradox that God has set before everyone is an internal condition and an external condition commonly referred to as "good and evil."
Even though we may do and be good, the fact of evil has NOT disappeared from the equations. This is a paradox. And paradoxes, by nature, can be tricky subjects. To lean on one or the other side will produce confusions. Both presentations remain in play and remain facts, even though they are opposing facts.
The scriptures are built upon this paradox. Of good and evil. That is the Divine Environment that we "all" have been placed into and are subject to. In order to understand the paradox, we may have to personally submit to it to understand it. Or we remain confused by it.
In understanding it personally, we understand our place, as subjects to the paradox, and we then bow or submit to Gods Hands in making our environment, so.
IN this equation for example, a child of God is both sinner and saint. And this is the ground we argue about for the most part, trying to be one or the other when in fact what we perceive as we is actually both.
a child of God is both sinner and saint.
The vessel of dishonor is instantly known, by the claim of being "only" a vessel of honor.