Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
It's as though you're reading a different article. I even quoted and highlighted a portion of the article which states exactly what I have been consistently stating--logic is not something outside of God, God is logic.The article rightly understood does not support your premise.
I agree, it would be illogical to insist that God must be conformed and confined by his creation, but you're assuming that logic is something God created. But, that isn't the case--God is logic, just as the article states.God is the creator of the natural world and its laws. Those laws define reality. Everything is of and from God. Yet,God is outside of and above,beyond,his creation.
It is illogical to insist God must be conformed by,confined by,his creation.
Logic is our domain. Not God's. God created what defines in our world, Logic. The created does not limit the creator.
I think that would be the case if he created logic and so wasn't "bound" by it. But, if logic just existed apart from God, then I think he would be "bound" by it and so could do neither.So, if logic was not part of God's nature then in theory God could create a rock too big for Him to lift and then He would lift it?
I think so. If God could contradict his nature, then he could sin, which, as I have stated, would mean he is completely untrustworthy.The definition of a PERFECT God would change in a world where logic was not a foundation of knowledge.
Then just stop. lol You're making my head hurt. I actually do like trying to wrap my head around it, so thanks for the questions. It's good to ponder the nature of God, as who we think he is really matters (as you know).It is difficult to discuss this as it relies on the possibility that there could be an illogical world and we only have logic to postulate what that world might be like.
LOL ... philosophy is not my strong suit
Like doing a puzzle .... you sort it all out for some reason, then scrabble it up and put it back in the box.Why do you have to ask such questions?
LOLThen just stop. lol You're making my head hurt.
Me too .. though this question is above my pay gradeI actually do like trying to wrap my head around it, so thanks for the questions.
Agreed ... but then there was Job who was chastened for doing something similar. I often pray for forgiveness for what I think that is in error. His thoughts aren't our thoughts so my batting average must be mighty low.It's good to ponder the nature of God, as who we think he is really matters (as you know).
This makes zero sense. We have His Will to rely on. I could destroy my keyboard right now, does that mean i'm "untrustworthy" with it, merely because i can destroy it? Absurd.If God could contradict his nature, then he could sin, which, as I have stated, would mean he is completely untrustworthy
Yes, that is absurd, but that is because it's a false analogy.I could destroy my keyboard right now, does that mean i'm "untrustworthy" with it, merely because i can destroy it? Absurd.
On the contrary, it makes perfect, logical sense.This makes zero sense.
We have His Will to rely on.
But, these are fallaciously begging the question. Why do you think you "have His Will to rely on"? How do you actually know that "We can trust God because of His record"? Is it because the Bible says so, which you believe is his revelation to us?We can trust God because of His record, regardless of if He can or can't sin.
Relying on God's Record is not "begging the question".But, these are fallaciously begging the question.
Because He refuses to lie. always.Why do you think you "have His Will to rely on"?
And it's because of evidence after evidence backing the Bible.How do you actually know that "We can trust God because of His record"? Is it because the Bible says so, which you believe is his revelation to us?
And I could spontaenously turn into a nuclear bomb and blow a crater in the planet. Actually, that's more likely than God sinning not simply because He "can't" , but "won't". His Will is perfect. It's proven.If God can go against his nature, then that means he can act in whatever way he so chooses. Among the numerous sins he could commit, he could lie. That means the whole Bible could be a lie, including what he supposedly reveals about himself.
One great thing about God is, He always wants to do the right thing." He could also be unjust, which means that in the end, if there even is a Great White Throne Judgement, he could just say "Gotcha!" and then send every single human to hell to be tortured for all eternity,"
One great thing about God is, He always wants to do the right thing. And does it.or just cause us all to cease to exist. At any point in time, he could simply just choose to end it all or commit any evil act he wanted.
THAT is what begs the question, because it assumes "God cant do logically impossible"."Yes, that is absurd, but that is because it's a false analogy."
Athiests also say it is circular if you think God CAN'T go against His Nature. You first have to prove He can ONLY follow It, and using the Bible to do so is "circular".In other words, if God can go against his nature, then you first have to assume that he is trustworthy and that what the Bible says is actually from him, in order to believe that he is trustworthy and that the Bible is from him and therefore true in what it reveals about him. Do you see how circular that is?
This is unfulfilling and the person can easily counter.This is a nonsense argument that also is based on a lack of proper interpretation and understanding.
Again, if God can go against his nature, then that is all begging the question. You're assuming that it is God's record, that God refuses to lie, that God is perfect. Really, you can't even know what his nature is.Relying on God's Record is not "begging the question".
At no point has His Record been disproven.
Because He refuses to lie. always.
And it's because of evidence after evidence backing the Bible.
What would God's motive for lying be, even? He's perfect.
What does that have to do with anything?And I could spontaenously turn into a nuclear bomb and blow a crater in the planet.
Again, if God can go against his nature, then that is all begging the question.Actually, that's more likely than God sinning not simply because He "can't" , but "won't". His Will is perfect. It's proven.
The chance of God sinning is NONE. Whether your stance or my posts' stance is correct.
One great thing about God is, He always wants to do the right thing.
Why are we praising God if He has NO choice other than to follow a standard?
One great thing about God is, He always wants to do the right thing. And does it.
He can't because such things are contradictory, as has been pointed out many times in this thread by various members.THAT is what begs the question, because it assumes "God cant do logically impossible".
Atheists have a lot of wrong thoughts about God.Athiests also say it is circular if you think God CAN'T go against His Nature. You first have to prove He can ONLY follow It, and using the Bible to do so is "circular".
Of course it's unfulfilling, because the argument was nonsense. My comment was not an argument to refute the nonsense argument, so of course a "person can easily counter."This is unfulfilling and the person can easily counter.
The Bible Does State that the Creator stands by/ honors / His Word . This is often not logical to men.The Bible doesn't state God is bound by logic.
No worries. Free is replying to you later in this thread excepting parts of an article I posted earlier.Agreed
So, if logic was not part of God's nature then in theory God could create a rock too big for Him to lift and then He would lift it? The definition of a PERFECT God would change in a world where logic was not a foundation of knowledge.
It is difficult to discuss this as it relies on the possibility that there could be an illogical world and we only have logic to postulate what that world might be like.
LOL ... philosophy is not my strong suit
Do you see how this is a self-refuting sentence? Either "there is nothing that God can't do" or "he can't lie." Both statements cannot be true.God can do whatever pleases him, he can’t lie though,there is nothing that God can’t do.
They cannot be.Both statements are true.
You diminish God and make him less than he is, and ignore Scripture in the process:God could lie, but He won't. He is not a man that He should (nor would) lie like all men.
I don’t actually,no, God can do anything he chooses to do, he also can’t lie, sorry, what is there God can’t do , if it pleases him to do so?Do you see how this is a self-refuting sentence? Either "there is nothing that God can't do" or "he can't lie." Both statements cannot be true.