C
Catholic Crusader
Guest
No they havent.BobRyan said:Problem with that is that the "protesting Catholics" demonstrated that the RCC had gone into error.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
No they havent.BobRyan said:Problem with that is that the "protesting Catholics" demonstrated that the RCC had gone into error.
StoveBolts said:Bubba,
Please check you inbox.
LOL!francisdesales said:Hey Jeff,
Can I get something in my inbox, too?!!
Hope all is well with you and yours.
Joe
If you wish to challange a member to a One On One debate. You should ask that person and if that person agrees; the two of you may debate it one on one here, (in the Debate Forum) . This is open to ALL topics including UR (Universal Reconcilation). If you want to start a debate with someone one on one, you may also post a topic here, if a person decides to take the challenge. IT WILL ONLY BE THE TWO OF YOU.
StoveBolts said:Bubba,
Please check you inbox.
StoveBolts said:...please read the sticky "Concerning Universal Reconcilation...
Slippery is more like it. ;-)Catholic Crusader said:StoveBolts said:...please read the sticky "Concerning Universal Reconcilation...
Does that mean that Universal Reconcilation is sticky?
Brother, isn't it always?Perhaps - but I don't know for sure - the problem lies in interpretation of defining whose works are whose and how the Scriptures speaks of works...
vic C. said:You know my slant; the works I do, are not of myself. 8-)
vic C. said:You know my slant; the works I do, are not of myself. 8-)
Bubba said:In respect to the Church prior to Augustine, the UR people have strong support in the historical account of individuals and early creeds, but unfortunately this can not be discussed unless on the Debate forum.
Bubba said:Thus with the recent disasters in China and Burma, the question of the state of those souls who never heard the gospel of our Lord, is now according to traditional beliefs, in torment for eternity is a difficult concept to receive for me.
Thanks, Arph. There's no glory in my flesh until the day we receive glorified bodies. Until then, ALL glory is God's. :angel:So sure it's easy! We don't have to do any of it except ask! Why don't we have to do any of it except ask? Simple!: We CAN'T do any of it except ask! Sorry, the Lord gets ALL the glory and Man gets NONE!
Francisdesales,francisdesales said:Bubba said:In respect to the Church prior to Augustine, the UR people have strong support in the historical account of individuals and early creeds, but unfortunately this can not be discussed unless on the Debate forum.
I have some serious doubts on that, since I have read the Fathers and don't recall them discussing "UR" - except to the degree that Christ died for all men. But that means redemption is AVAILABLE to all men, not GIVEN to all men.
No need to comment, just offering you the correct meaning of the Fathers on this topic. The Church continues to teach universal OFFERING, which leads to your next comment...
Bubba said:Thus with the recent disasters in China and Burma, the question of the state of those souls who never heard the gospel of our Lord, is now according to traditional beliefs, in torment for eternity is a difficult concept to receive for me.
Forgive me, Jeff and Vic, I MUST comment on this for the sake of Bubba and other people reading this - the above idea can torment someone and leads to one formulating a "UR" idea...
The Church nor the Scriptures do not teach that those who have never heard of the Gospel are condemned. Only those who REJECT it, as in John 3:18
He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Here, "believe not" refers NOT to "ignorance" but to willingly rejecting, as the Pharisees did. God will judge man based on what he knows - whether it is the "law placed in the heart", as per Romans 2, or whether one is a full-fledged Christian, whom, previously being "illuminated", have now "re-crucified" Christ as per Hebrews.
Hell is for those who reject God, not those who don't know about Him.
I hope that clears up some misperceptions. God is a God of love and only sends those to hell who reject Him.
If you desire to further discuss this, please PM me.
Regards
vic C. said:CC, I have been rethinking "Free Will" lately. 8-)
Catholic Crusader said:[quote="vic C.":35a74]
You know my slant; the works I do, are not of myself. 8-)
BobRyan said:Catholic Crusader said:[quote="vic C.":f939e]
You know my slant; the works I do, are not of myself. 8-)
How does Free Will fit into that? Even though such things are by God's grace, is it not a cooperation with God's grace on out part - an act of the will - to actually DO the works?
BobRyan said:Catholic Crusader said:[quote="vic C.":5c8c2]
You know my slant; the works I do, are not of myself. 8-)
How does Free Will fit into that? Even though such things are by God's grace, is it not a cooperation with God's grace on out part - an act of the will - to actually DO the works?