Benoni said:
Spin, spin, spin with no scriptural backing.
Find a new line.
The ONLY scriptures youve presented have been horribly mangled by you and another poster here.
Dont waste our time pretending like youve offered anything but your own personal agenda and additions to the texts.
You HAVE been given scriptures in this thread and you KNOW it. You just ignore the clear scriptures and pervert those that arent so clear to suit your error.
I show you the word draw, I show how it is used it God’s Word and you give me more of you vague religious opinion; with nothing scripturally to back up your bias vague religious point.
The definition of ONE word and YOUR twist on it is NOTHING compared to the overwhelming evidence in the scriptures that PROVE your absurd fallacy wrong.
If anyone cannot connect the dots it is you;
Keep telling yourself that nonsense,friend, maybe it'll sink in
we addressed the trinity and to this day just like the word freewill you cannot prove either even exist using God’s Word.
"just like"....EXACTLY.
Your offer the same pathetic illogical reasoning to both...which is why you cant seem to figure out either..
I asked you how many times to show me where in scripture is the word freewill or choice used with Adam’s fall, as well as man’s salvation.
And youve been GIVEN evidence for BOTH...but apparently you prefer to ignore any CLEAR scriptures you wish and hide behind what you can pervert in Gods word
Mans Choice
Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am tempted by God"; for God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone.
But each one is tempted by his own lusts, being drawn away and being seduced by them.
Then lust, when it conceives, gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death.
(Jas 1:13-15 )
Now make up your excuses why that doesnt supposedly mean what it SAYS.
MAN, not God, is the source of his OWN sinfulness.
MAN, not God, DECIDES to follow his lusts into sin.
MAN exercises his free will TO commit sin, GOD is not responsible for that choice.
Carnal man has to resist, his will must resist because; he has no power but to resist until God draws him. This so called nonsense is backed by verses from the Bible not my opinion which is all you have. Romans 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
AGAIN....there is NO evidence that creation was SUBJECTED to vanity/futility PRIOR to ADams fall.
All I see you doing now is barking all over the place trying to distract from the FACT that youve lost the ACTUAL discussion here.
We ALL know that NO ONE comes to the Son unless the Father draws him first.
What I see is that you are seeing that youve lost this discussion about God causing the fall and now are running to anything you can to smokescreen that fact.
The topic here is
'Did God CAUSE the fall'....not
'Can man come to the Son without the Father drawing him'.
Man can only come to the Son if the FAther is drawing him....we ALL know that.
God did NOT 'cause' man to CHOOSE to sin and thus separate himself from God.
If youre connecting those together then your entire doctrine is based in error and horrid non-sequitur illogic.
God did NOT cause the fall and had NOT subjected creation to CORRUPTION while CALLING IT GOOD !
YOUR fallacy has to say that God said that creation was GOOD while it was CORRUPT because HE CORRUPTED IT Himself....preposterous
(NIRV) Romans 8: 20 The created world was bound to fail. But that was not the result of its own choice. It was planned that way by the One who made it. God planned to set the created world free. He didn't want it to rot away completely. Instead, he wanted it to have the same glorious freedom that his children have
Again with this godless perversion of a rendering.
There is NOTHING in the ACTUAL text of Romans 8:20 that says the the created world was 'bound to fail' as this perverse version youre pushing says.
READERS SEE the link to see what the ACTUAL greek text shows
>>>Romans 8:20
Rom 8:20
(ASV) For the creation was subjected to vanity, not of its own will, but by reason of him who subjected it, in hope
(EMTV) For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but on account of Him who subjected it in hope;
(ISV) because the creation was subjected to frustration, though not by its own choice. The one who subjected it did so in the hope
(KJV) For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,
(LITV) For the creation was not willingly subjected to vanity, but through Him subjecting it, on hope;
(MKJV) For the creation was not willingly subjected to vanity, but because of Him who subjected it on hope
(YLT) for to vanity was the creation made subject--not of its will, but because of Him who did subject it --in hope,
2.0
Cause and effect.
WHEN God CREATED He called creation GOOD....not 'corrupt'.
[quote:2kn4yffd]Gen 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good.
The WHOLE creation which WAS GOOD in the beginning now has been affected by Adams transgression...
For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.
(Romans 8:20-22 KJV)
ALL creation has been subjected to futility and corruption, which WAS NOT said about it in the beginning when it WAS 'good'.
It was not 'corrupted' by God in the beginning as some false doctrines profess.
It happened when Adam chose to sin and thus caused himself and creation to be subjected TO this punishment.
Creation could NOT be 'good' and 'corrupt' at the same time.
The change happened when Adam sinned and God pronounced judgment on man..
[/quote:2kn4yffd]