Now why wouldn't they pray for healing? That doesn't make sense. We pray for healing but we also trust God regardless of what happens.Then I guess those who embrace this view will also be embracing their illness instead of asking for His stripes to rid them of this adversity.
The main problem I've seen, is that when people believe that it's all about faith, then when they aren't healed, their faith suffers drastically.
You didn't understand what I was saying.No, one can understand pride when they see it and not be proud. To follow your thinking, one had better not notice any vice at all. Because to you, if one sees a vice, well then one has it. Silencing of the truth on a different level.
Your condescending tone is noted. God does heal but he doesn't heal everyone in the timing that they want, and some won't get healed in this life. Why do you think that Paul told Timothy to start drinking wine for his stomach? Why didn't Timothy just get healed? Do you think he didn't have enough faith, as one who was a spiritual son of Paul?Wow, it does talk about humility. Is that connected to reality? Can you answer why scripture says, "by his stripes we are healed" which is clearly physical healing, the only kind recorded in the Bible? Why is sickness not considered merely adversity and accepted?
Isaiah 53:5 isn't necessarily speaking of physical healing, especially considering the context:
Isa 53:4 Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted.
Isa 53:5 But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed.
Isa 53:6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all. (ESV)
Notice that in verse 4, the servant "has borne our griefs and sorrows." Then, it is said "he was pierced for our transgressions" and "he was crushed for our iniquities." Those are both spiritual, as is the third, "the chastisement that brought us peace." The "peace" is salvation. It makes sense then that the healing spoken of is spiritual, being healed from the death and decay that sin, as a disease, brings on us. Or, to think of it another way, to be forgiven is to be healed of the disease of sin.
There simply is reason to believe that verse 5 is not speaking of "clearly physical healing."
No, you don't know what it was because he never says what it was. All he says it that it was a messenger from Satan, but what that means has been debated for centuries.I know what it was and it was not illness. That does not humble a person. Paul mentions it elsewhere in his letters.
Your patronizing is unnecessary. You need to read what people are actually writing. That it was to prove the truth of his claims about who he was and his message has nothing to do with wanting "to show how great he was."wow, not because he loved people but merely loved himself and wanted to show how great he was, I assume. He said he had compassion on them. It did not say he wanted to show them how great he was.
Figures.Ok, we can dismiss that one.
Wow. You seem to have little idea of what true humility is.The "relying solely on God" claim can be very proud.
I have no idea what your point is here.That is what so many of them say. They weep when they say it. The church watches the show and believes them. Sounds good to them.