Greetings again Josef,
John 3:16 (KJV): For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Many of the normal popular doctrines could be compared to this simple, pure statement.
1. At the heart of this is "God's love for the world", or the fallen descendants of Adam. We most probably agree here. It is the work of God, initiated and brought to completion by God.
2. God "gave": This indicates the method. He gave Jesus as a sacrifice. He did not beat Jesus in anger as some suggest.
3. "his only begotten Son": This is where we differ. Trinitarians do not accept that Jesus is God's only begotten Son, but believe that somehow Jesus is God, and God the Son, a God-man. Nothing to do with "begettal".
4. "whosever believeth in him": Maybe similar, but Paul's description of being "in him" by water baptism Galatians 3:26-29 is most probably excluded by most.
5. "should not perish": This is what happens to descendants of Adam, they perish, they return to the dust. Most believe that the wicked immortal souls go to hell, but not "perish".
6. "everlasting life": Again, most believe that their soul is immortal and goes to heaven at death, but Jesus is really speaking here of a gift bestowed on the faithful.
So yes, the simple gospel is revealed in John 3:16, and is rejected by most. What is also missing from this verse is what is the ultimate role of Jesus, where is he now, and what will he do in the future. I consider these things are also part of the Gospel of the Kingdom and Name. Also there are many aspects of the "Name" that need to be understood, such as how do we identify with the death and resurrection of Christ.
Kind regards
Trevor
I doubt that many agree with the teaching of John 3:16, or at least accept the way that I read the details:The simple gospel is John 3:16.
John 3:16 (KJV): For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Many of the normal popular doctrines could be compared to this simple, pure statement.
1. At the heart of this is "God's love for the world", or the fallen descendants of Adam. We most probably agree here. It is the work of God, initiated and brought to completion by God.
2. God "gave": This indicates the method. He gave Jesus as a sacrifice. He did not beat Jesus in anger as some suggest.
3. "his only begotten Son": This is where we differ. Trinitarians do not accept that Jesus is God's only begotten Son, but believe that somehow Jesus is God, and God the Son, a God-man. Nothing to do with "begettal".
4. "whosever believeth in him": Maybe similar, but Paul's description of being "in him" by water baptism Galatians 3:26-29 is most probably excluded by most.
5. "should not perish": This is what happens to descendants of Adam, they perish, they return to the dust. Most believe that the wicked immortal souls go to hell, but not "perish".
6. "everlasting life": Again, most believe that their soul is immortal and goes to heaven at death, but Jesus is really speaking here of a gift bestowed on the faithful.
So yes, the simple gospel is revealed in John 3:16, and is rejected by most. What is also missing from this verse is what is the ultimate role of Jesus, where is he now, and what will he do in the future. I consider these things are also part of the Gospel of the Kingdom and Name. Also there are many aspects of the "Name" that need to be understood, such as how do we identify with the death and resurrection of Christ.
Kind regards
Trevor
Last edited: