To the thread:
Just for your information: I am a WASP -- a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant.
The state of Connecticut abolished the Death Penalty and their Supreme Court gave several reasons why they did. Here is one of their reasons:
Start quote.
It confronted a long, consistent record of unfairness:
"What has not changed is that, throughout every period of our state’s history, the death penalty has been imposed disproportionately on those whom society has marginalized socially, politically, and economically: people of color, the poor and uneducated, and unpopular immigrant and ethnic groups. It always has been easier for us to execute those we see as inferior or less intrinsically worthy."
End quote
______________
My question to the thread is Do you believe that the Connecticut Supreme Court spoke the truth up there? Do you disagree with what they wrote? If you do disagree, why do you disagree?
Just for your information: I am a WASP -- a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant.
The state of Connecticut abolished the Death Penalty and their Supreme Court gave several reasons why they did. Here is one of their reasons:
Start quote.
It confronted a long, consistent record of unfairness:
"What has not changed is that, throughout every period of our state’s history, the death penalty has been imposed disproportionately on those whom society has marginalized socially, politically, and economically: people of color, the poor and uneducated, and unpopular immigrant and ethnic groups. It always has been easier for us to execute those we see as inferior or less intrinsically worthy."
End quote
A Strong Argument Against Capital Punishment
The Connecticut Supreme Court has confronted questions that legal cases seldom answer: Is capital punishment moral? Is it necessary?
www.newyorker.com
______________
My question to the thread is Do you believe that the Connecticut Supreme Court spoke the truth up there? Do you disagree with what they wrote? If you do disagree, why do you disagree?