Eventide
Member
- Jul 31, 2010
- 3,477
- 2
Re: For the LAW was given by Moses, but Grace and truth came by Jesus Christ...
I was trying to illustrate the point that because a person is baptized in water, regardless if they're an infant or not.. that it does not necessitate that they're born again through that act because God alone places each and every member of HIS BODY into place miraculously by the power of the Holy Spirit. 1 Cor 12:13 makes this very clear.
Baptism into Christ by the miraculous power of the Holy Spirit is not relevant ?
And again, imo people want to be baptized after they're born again and placed into the body of Christ.. it's joy unspeakable to say the least..
We'll simply need to disagree on this one.. because imo the water didn't save a single soul, the Ark did.. and that's a picture of Christ, as He alone had the waves and billows of God's punishment role over Him on that forsaken cross.. and by His resurrection we're justified.. our baptism is a type of His where we willingly lay down our life for His infinitely glorious life. We die to self and are raised in newness of Life in HIM, for He alone is the way, the truth, and the life.
Who said anything about infants? they can hear but can they believe what they cannot yet understand? I say no, therefore your conclusion is correct, they just got wet.
I was trying to illustrate the point that because a person is baptized in water, regardless if they're an infant or not.. that it does not necessitate that they're born again through that act because God alone places each and every member of HIS BODY into place miraculously by the power of the Holy Spirit. 1 Cor 12:13 makes this very clear.
Because only twice has there been anyone baptized with the Holy Spirit and is not relevant, once to the Apostles (Jews) on Pentecost , and once to the house of Cornelius (Gentile) to show all (including the Apostles) that God was not a respecter of person... this is not the baptism you or I or anyone receives today and this baptism did not save them, the very next verse Peter says:
Acts 10:47 (KJV)
47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
Verse 48 Peter commands them to be Baptized... Why? if this baptism of the Holy Spirit is what you say IS our baptism, then why command them to be baptized with water? because:
Baptism into Christ by the miraculous power of the Holy Spirit is not relevant ?
And again, imo people want to be baptized after they're born again and placed into the body of Christ.. it's joy unspeakable to say the least..
1 Peter 3:20-22 (KJV)
20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:...
The water is here shown as the instrument of salvation and cleansing of sin by example (Noah and his ark, and cleansing the earth) so too does baptism, the instrument being the water, and THROUGH IT we are now saved... but so as not for any to draw conclusion that this be a ritual (show of obedience as some do today) the writer includes (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,)
We'll simply need to disagree on this one.. because imo the water didn't save a single soul, the Ark did.. and that's a picture of Christ, as He alone had the waves and billows of God's punishment role over Him on that forsaken cross.. and by His resurrection we're justified.. our baptism is a type of His where we willingly lay down our life for His infinitely glorious life. We die to self and are raised in newness of Life in HIM, for He alone is the way, the truth, and the life.