Were you atoned for?
Yes?
Then you are sanctified.
It happens in an instant, when the blood of Christ is applied to your body.
As I said, sanctification in one sense is a setting apart of believers for God and away from the rest of the world and its ways. But, in another sense, it is an ongoing process of holiness, making us more like Christ. It's both.
Why does your version of the KJV add confusing words?
What words were added that confuse you?
They are often the same thing.
One of the definitions of sanctification is "made holy".
Were you not made holy when your sins were remitted?
I sure was, thanks be to God.
You have a different definition for sanctification than I do.
As I repeatedly made clear, there are two aspects to sanctification--past and present (continual). You still sin, so you are not holy in the way Jesus was holy on earth or the way God is holy. That is what we are in process towards, to be like Christ.
I think your understandings of "holiness" and "sanctification" may be deficient. You seem to think that they only refer to being set apart, a one-time occurrence. However:
1Th 4:3 For this is the will of God, your sanctification: that you abstain from sexual immorality;
1Th 4:4 that each one of you know how to control his own body in holiness and honor, (ESV)
If we are once and for all sanctified, then why is sanctification God's will for us?
1Pe 1:15 but as he who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct,
1Pe 1:16 since it is written, “You shall be holy, for I am holy.” (ESV)
The command or exhortation to "be holy" makes no sense if we are completely holy.
1Pe 2:1 So
put away all malice and all deceit and hypocrisy and envy and all slander.
1Pe 2:2 Like newborn infants, long for the pure spiritual milk,
that by it you may grow up into salvation—
1Pe 2:3 if indeed you have tasted that the Lord is good.
1Pe 2:4 As you come to him, a living stone rejected by men but in the sight of God chosen and precious,
1Pe 2:5 you yourselves like living stones
are being built up as a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood, to offer spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. (ESV)
Similarly, we are to "grow up into salvation" and are "being built up as a spiritual house, to be a holy priesthood." All these things--salvation, holiness, sanctification--are spoken of as past and present conditions, with a fulfillment and completion in the future.
We grow in grace and knowledge, but we start from a position of holiness, atoned for, set apart, coscecration.
And we grow in holiness.
They happen simultaneously with the application f the blood of Christ.
The one aspect, yes.
The only nuance to the word perfect, is imperfection.
No, imperfection is a different word. Here is the Greek word
teleios, translated as perfect in Matt 5:48:
Definition |
- brought to its end, finished
- wanting nothing necessary to completeness
- perfect
- that which is perfect
- consummate human integrity and virtue
- of men
- full grown, adult, of full age, mature
|
|
King James Word Usage - Total: 19 |
perfect 17, man 1, of full age 1 |
https://www.biblestudytools.com/lexicons/greek/kjv/teleios.html
We are not commanded to do the impossible.
We certainly are.
I worship a God that makes it possible to be perfectly obedient.
Don't you?
If not, we should talk some more.
While God might make it possible, there is no Christian who ever has or will attain perfect obedience because we still battle the flesh, temptation, and the enemy.
If you look at Phil 3:11, you will see that the thing he had not yet attained was the resurrection from the dead.
Yes, I know. He had not attained it. That is clear. But he adds, "or am already perfect," which refers to the rest of the verse and the two that follow.
That is unscriptural.
It implies continued washings from sin by the blood of Christ, which He does once at baptism in His name for the remission for sins. (Acts 2:38)
I assure you, it's scriptural and in no way whatsoever implies such. Justification is a one-time event only. The ongoing process of sanctification is done by the Spirit working in us to walk by the Spirit and grow in holiness over our lifetime.
Your concentration on the word "we" has hidden the word "if".
Nope.
IF we walk in darkness we cannot say we have no sin.
IF we walk in the light, we can say we have no sin.
Where does John say that "If we walk in darkness we cannot say we have no sin"? Something John actually wrote I can state the following, because it is :
If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
If we say we have sin, we don't deceive ourselves, and the truth is in us.
God is the light, and there is no sin in God.
Of course. That goes without saying. But it is more correct to follow John in saying that "God is light." It is speaking of his absolute nature and represents a number of things--glory; truth; holiness; love; life; etc.
You must think there is sin in God in spite of what 1 John 1: 5 said..."This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all."
Of course not. How can you even come to such a conclusion?
If we are walking in God, there can be no sin in/on us.
This is not a biblical position. The whole point John is making is that believers do sin and to say otherwise is false and self-deception, and makes God a liar. But when we do sin, we can confess our sins and find forgiveness, since Jesus is our advocate before the Father.
Jesus could, and so can we.
Jesus could, but we can't. Much of the NT testifies to this.
You don't think anyone can walk in the light,, which is God, do you?
Of course I do. I'm not sure how you came to such a conclusion. It just doesn't mean that one is sinless or can live without sin.
Do you think the blood of Christ can wash away past sins at all?
Of course, but that is not what we're discussing.
If one is still sinning, the "any man", (your version of the KJ bible says "anyone") is the sinner...which shows they were not walking in the light and were walking in darkness.
Which means they cannot say they have fellowship with God either. (1 John 1:6)
"(your version of the KJ bible". You are aware that I'm using the ESV, which is why I always put ESV, so why keep referring to it as "your version of the KJ Bible"?
John is clearly writing to believers--"My little children"--and saying that if any of them does sin, Jesus is their advocate. All they need is to confess their sins and be forgiven (1:9).
You got it wrong.
1 John 2:3-4..."And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.
He that saith, I know him, and keepeth not his commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him."
1 John 2:2's "anyone" doesn't know God or keep His commandments.
They walk in darkness.
But those who know God and keep His commandments have an Advocate for them.
No, I'm quite confident that I didn't. It's actually a pretty straightforward, clear passage. John is writing to believers and encouraging them not to sin, but if they do, they need to confess those sins to be forgiven and cleansed.
What is the purpose of an advocate? What is the reason believers need an advocate? What is the reason believers need Christ to intercede continually on their behalf (Rom 8:34; Heb 7:25)?