jasoncran said:
But he didnt why, freewill to serve him mustn't be overriden.
Free will, the bane of Calvinists. Yet, can you define free will? John MacArther says we have the free will to choose any path of sin we want. I like that! Is that free will?
jasoncran said:
Some will choose to go to hell, but that wasnt God intent to have people have no choice in the matter
God has no choice? Does he even foreknow what choice will be made? If he does, would it not be better to not create them then to punish them for all eternity, or to later destroy them in some other way?
jasoncran said:
unlike some calivinstic persons say that some will have no choice to come to christ and others wont have that choice.
jasoncran, I know there are Calvinists that do not always represent themselves correctly. I do not know where you got this idea that Calvinists do not believe in "choice." I am a Calvinist and I have no problem with the concept of man making a choice. However, I would say that those who make the correct choice do so because they are drawn by God. Regeneration is the cause of this correct choice to have faith. Regeneration does not mean we do not make a choice either for good or evil, but rather that God inclines the heart to make a choice of faith.
So then, both believers and unbelievers have choice. Unbelievers love their rebellion, and when offered choice, choose that which they love. On the other hand, when God works upon the heart and regenerates a person, that person will "hear" the word, and make a good choice. My point here is that the statement that Calvinists do not believe in an offer of the Gospel, or the concept of "choice" is not actually true. We do choose, but God is sovereign even over that choice.
jasoncran said:
God allows free will, otherwise why the verses that say see that you dont refuse him.
I suspect you are speaking of the warning passages in Hebrews, or maybe Matthew 23. Certainly there are many passages that make the call to salvation, offer men choices. Then there are passages that speak of the nature of the natural unregenerate man as only evil, rebellious, and one who hates the Gospel and God. Will not a theology that focuses on one side to the exclusion of the other be unbalanced? The nature of man is rebellious and evil and we do not choose good unless God intervenes and regenerates. Yet we do have choice and we choose that which we love.
What think ye?