Hey All,
There is no reason to be upset Grailhunter. You are a teacher. As a student, if you teach something that makes no sense to me, I have a right to call you on it. The text in John 2 says wedding. Strong's tells me this:
gamos: a wedding
Original Word: γάμος, ου, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: gamos
Phonetic Spelling: (gam'-os)
Definition: a wedding
Usage: a marriage, wedding, wedding-ceremony; plur: a wedding-feast.
The word "gamos" occurs 16 times in Scripture.
9 times as marriage; 7 times as wedding. (Ya gotta love Strong's. All done without a computer. What a labor of love.)
So Strong's does not agree with your view.
The commentaries I used called the ceremony a wedding as well.
OK, what about something outside the Bible?
Have you ever heard of the Greek poet Homer? His primary works "The Iliad" and "The Odyssey" are epic poems, and the two oldest known works of Western literature. They were written sometime between 750-650 B.C.
Guess what they both contain. Wedding ceremonies. Peleus and Thetis in the Iliad. Odysseus and Penelope in the Odyssey. I don't have to use the Bible to prove that there were wedding ceremonies in ancient Greece.
So why would you tell me weddings didn't exist, and the book of john was purposely altered when nobody agrees with you? I have given you independent proof that your premise is not correct. You have given no proof that John is altered other than because you say so. It is a tactic of cults to manipulate Scripture: "What is there is not really there." Then the cult manipulates Scripture for their purposes. This is how Jehovah's Witnesses change " . . . The Word was God" to " . . . The Word was a God." That is manipulation that can cost a person their salvation. It all starts with, "It doesn't really say . . . " Am I passionate about the truth? Yeah I am.
"Is Satan a schemer? (Answer: Yes.)
Does Satan tempt us? (Answer: Yes.)
Can he put thoughts in our mind? (Answer: Not normally if the Holy Spirit indwells the believer. It would have to be allowed ala Job as a testing period. I know this first hand. I struggled with sin my whole life. It wasn't Satan. It was my own fleshly desires. I am not proud of it. But it was not Satan. It was me.)
So then how does he tempt us? I would probably need a list for that.
How did he tempt Eve? How did he tempt Adam?" Quote from Grailhunter
How indeed!
Genesis 3:4-5 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
A lie "Ye shall not surely die:" mixed with the truth "your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."
"You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain….
What did Yahweh mean by this? " Quote from Grailhunter
Look up vain in the dictionary and you will have your answer. In short God's name was to be spoken reverently.
"Did He mean that He did not want His name ever pronounced or written in sacred texts? And then forgotten?
Well overall this is how the Jews took it. Does that make any sense? NO.
Did God or Satan remove His name from the scriptures? NO.
Men did it. No we cannot blame this one on the women." Quote from Grailhunter
Have you ever considered that the Jewish scholars took God's name out as an act of reverence? You cannot take God's name in vain if you do not know it.
"But I did say that the marriage in Cana was probably some form of a wedding as we understand it. " Quote from Grailhunter
You spend all this time arguing against it being a wedding. Yet here you concede it was probably a wedding. If we were on debate teams, you just lost. Your argument is not sustainable. By the way, we are not on debate teams. I am not trying to win. I just want you to see the inconsistency of your post.
"Now that you have accused me of manipulating you….Do not ever talk to me again. Because you are tempting me to respond to you in such away that would violate the rules of this forum." Quote from Grailhunter
Look back at my post. I did not accuse you of anything. I asked you a question.
"You are trying to manipulate Scripture to make it say what you need it to. Why? Are you trying to manipulate me?" Quote from me
A simple answer would be no. Your defensive attitude and over-reaction to a simple question is classic Freudian behavior.
I have answered the questions you posed, and did it with joy in my heart. I am not going to treat you the way you have treated me. I will offer you my other cheek should you feel the need.
Keep walking everybody.
May God bless,
Taz
There is no reason to be upset Grailhunter. You are a teacher. As a student, if you teach something that makes no sense to me, I have a right to call you on it. The text in John 2 says wedding. Strong's tells me this:
gamos: a wedding
Original Word: γάμος, ου, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: gamos
Phonetic Spelling: (gam'-os)
Definition: a wedding
Usage: a marriage, wedding, wedding-ceremony; plur: a wedding-feast.
The word "gamos" occurs 16 times in Scripture.
9 times as marriage; 7 times as wedding. (Ya gotta love Strong's. All done without a computer. What a labor of love.)
So Strong's does not agree with your view.
The commentaries I used called the ceremony a wedding as well.
OK, what about something outside the Bible?
Have you ever heard of the Greek poet Homer? His primary works "The Iliad" and "The Odyssey" are epic poems, and the two oldest known works of Western literature. They were written sometime between 750-650 B.C.
Guess what they both contain. Wedding ceremonies. Peleus and Thetis in the Iliad. Odysseus and Penelope in the Odyssey. I don't have to use the Bible to prove that there were wedding ceremonies in ancient Greece.
So why would you tell me weddings didn't exist, and the book of john was purposely altered when nobody agrees with you? I have given you independent proof that your premise is not correct. You have given no proof that John is altered other than because you say so. It is a tactic of cults to manipulate Scripture: "What is there is not really there." Then the cult manipulates Scripture for their purposes. This is how Jehovah's Witnesses change " . . . The Word was God" to " . . . The Word was a God." That is manipulation that can cost a person their salvation. It all starts with, "It doesn't really say . . . " Am I passionate about the truth? Yeah I am.
"Is Satan a schemer? (Answer: Yes.)
Does Satan tempt us? (Answer: Yes.)
Can he put thoughts in our mind? (Answer: Not normally if the Holy Spirit indwells the believer. It would have to be allowed ala Job as a testing period. I know this first hand. I struggled with sin my whole life. It wasn't Satan. It was my own fleshly desires. I am not proud of it. But it was not Satan. It was me.)
So then how does he tempt us? I would probably need a list for that.
How did he tempt Eve? How did he tempt Adam?" Quote from Grailhunter
How indeed!
Genesis 3:4-5 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
A lie "Ye shall not surely die:" mixed with the truth "your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil."
"You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain….
What did Yahweh mean by this? " Quote from Grailhunter
Look up vain in the dictionary and you will have your answer. In short God's name was to be spoken reverently.
"Did He mean that He did not want His name ever pronounced or written in sacred texts? And then forgotten?
Well overall this is how the Jews took it. Does that make any sense? NO.
Did God or Satan remove His name from the scriptures? NO.
Men did it. No we cannot blame this one on the women." Quote from Grailhunter
Have you ever considered that the Jewish scholars took God's name out as an act of reverence? You cannot take God's name in vain if you do not know it.
"But I did say that the marriage in Cana was probably some form of a wedding as we understand it. " Quote from Grailhunter
You spend all this time arguing against it being a wedding. Yet here you concede it was probably a wedding. If we were on debate teams, you just lost. Your argument is not sustainable. By the way, we are not on debate teams. I am not trying to win. I just want you to see the inconsistency of your post.
"Now that you have accused me of manipulating you….Do not ever talk to me again. Because you are tempting me to respond to you in such away that would violate the rules of this forum." Quote from Grailhunter
Look back at my post. I did not accuse you of anything. I asked you a question.
"You are trying to manipulate Scripture to make it say what you need it to. Why? Are you trying to manipulate me?" Quote from me
A simple answer would be no. Your defensive attitude and over-reaction to a simple question is classic Freudian behavior.
I have answered the questions you posed, and did it with joy in my heart. I am not going to treat you the way you have treated me. I will offer you my other cheek should you feel the need.
Keep walking everybody.
May God bless,
Taz