I am who some may call a 'seeker' but have grown discouraged. Grew up in a religious household and now am in my late 20s.
Its easy to see the God exists. Creation makes that evident.
I feel like I know God. I've felt His presence. I don't know doctrinally who He is... the God of Abraham; Mohammed; or the Trinity.
I'm sure he is not 100% pleased with me and the way I live but I can only do so much in this skin. I have many ingrained desires and wants which, without supernatural help, I cannot overcome.
But I just cannot come to believe in Jesus (and I have tried for over 20 years). I cannot see him. And there is no evidence of him from what I can see except from history and what people call the New Testament which I have read over many times and yes it is very beautiful and thoughtfully written albeit by men. The message is very compelling but it stops there - at 'believe in me'.
So I raise this question, to help me understand, to those on this forum who say they know Jesus on a personal level - how do you believe Jesus, someone you cannot see and there is no evidence of - verse God who you easily can see exists by nature?
How do you know that you know Jesus on a personal level and not the God of Abraham or some other?
Remember nature tells us there is a God, however I know of nothing that tells me there is a Jesus and He is alive today.... nothing.
How do you know who you are talking to when you pray is Jesus and not the God of Abraham or Mohammed?
zdan,
You could be missing something here. You say that it is easy to see that God exists as that is evident in creation. Could you be missing this fact? 'And now in these final days, he has spoken to us through his Son. God promised everything to the Son as an inheritance, and through the Son he created the universe' (Heb 1:2 NLT).
God the Son, Jesus, was involved in the creation of the universe.
It seems to me that you are having problems with dealing with the fact that the Jesus who became flesh and died on the cross and was resurrected, can be discovered through an investigation of history. Christianity is an historical religion. If Jesus, the son, did not manifest in history, no sacrifice for sin could be made (see John 1;18; 3:16; Eph 1:11; Col 1:16-17, 22; Heb 4:15; 9:15; 10:12; 1 John 2:2; 4:10). Accept that fact that you need to investigate history to pursue Jesus and the 4 Gospels and Book of Acts have been demonstrated to be historically reliable (see F F Bruce,
The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?)
You say, 'But I just cannot come to believe in Jesus (and I
have tried for over 20 years). I cannot see him. And there is no evidence of him from what I can see except from history and what people call the New Testament'. You must engage in historical investigation to discover the Jesus who came in the flesh.
You say that you cannot believe in Jesus because you 'cannot see him'. What else do you accept and believe in that you have not seen? Have you ever seen the secret formulae that Google uses to search the www to find what we want? Can you believe in these formulae to the point of using Google? Have you ever seen the equator, Tropic of Cancer or Tropic of Capricorn? Do you believe in them? The Tropic of Capricorn is located about 7 hours north (600km) of where I live in Brisbane, Qld., Australia. I've seen the sign to indicate the Tropic of Capricorn but I've never seen any real line that indicates that is what it is. It's invisible.
Think on the other things you cannot see that you believe in. You are erecting a straw man when you make the invisible Jesus an excuse for not believing in him. Christians whose lives have been changed by Jesus know that Jesus lives in them by the Holy Spirit who came into their lives at the point of conversion. I can assure you that I wouldn't be sitting at this PC communicating with you on this topic if the living Christ (by his Spirit) did not live in me and has changed my life.
As for your issue whether he is 'the God of Abraham; Mohammed; or the Trinity', the God of Abraham is the God of the Trinity. The God of Islam is monism.
Could Allah have had a son? Answering Islam has provided this evidence:
In the Qur'an we find the following two statements:
Sura 39:4
Had Allah wished to take to Himself a son,
He could have chosen whom He pleased out of those whom He doth create:
but Glory be to Him! (He is above such things.)
He is Allah, the One, the Irresistible. (Yusuf Ali)
If Allah had willed to choose a son,
He could have chosen what He would of that which He hath created.
Be He Glorified! He is Allah, the One, the Absolute. (Pickthall)
Sura 6:101
Wonderful Originator of the heavens and the earth;
How can He have a son when He has no consort?
He created all things, and He hath full knowledge of all things.
Sura 39:4 and 6:101 agree on the actuality, that Allah does not have a son, but they contradict each other in the issue of ability or possibility.
Sura 39:4 clearly states that God could have taken Himself a son from among his creation, i.e. without the necessity of a consort to father such a son. But Sura 6:101 clearly rejects the same idea as a logical impossibility.
I ask you to consider these matters more deeply.
Oz