The false prophet is human.
JLB
I presented a valid logical argument that negates this claim. Repeating your claim is not evidence.
Which Premise of my valid logical argument that I presented (that The False Prophet is NOT a human) are you disagreeing with and by what refutation using Scriptures to prove your case?
I presented a valid argument against your claim that The False Prophet is a human, first for a reason. I even asked for you to support your claim first as you are the one making the claim. You did not defend it, you just keep repeating it.
However, to progress, it’s first necessary for you to recognize that your “The False Prophet is human” claim is just that. Your claim. It might be right and it might not be right. I’m willing to be proven wrong. Are you?
You can’t just say “The False Prophet is human” and then go on to make further foundational doctrine(s) from that claim. John might or he might not have meant The False Prophet to be understood as a human. Let’s work through that claim of yours first.
We all have pre-suppositions. It’s unavoidable. However, if you want to determine (and debate) the truthfulness of our pre-supposition (The False Prophet is human, in this case), then use the rules of logic to establish it’s truthfulness. Especially if you’re going to go on further and build an ECT doctrine off of it. Remember, you said it was foundational to your ECT doctrine.
And for us Christians, The Logos is especially helpful to defend your case.
I have tentatively taken the opposite side of your foundational claim, “The False Prophet is human” and have presented two arguments for my side. (one negating your claim and one supporting mine) I’m willing to be proven wrong, also. But you’ve not done anything toward my first argument whatsoever that I can see.
You go on in your reply post to ignore my negation argument and still hold to the truth of your pre-supposition and attempt to refute my The False Prophet is a demon argument based on a claim that has not be proven true.
Why not deal first with whether it is in fact true or not that The False Prophet is human.
Do you have an answer for “Why do you think The False Prophet misses out on the day of the Judgment?”
WRT your evidence against my claim that The False Prophet is a demon:
If the demon that came out of the mouth of the false prophet was "his spirit", rather than a demon spirit in him, then his body would have died.
JLB
What body? Aren’t you simply assuming that The False Prophet had a human body?
If you want to speak as if it’s a given that The False Prophet is a human with a body, then why not first defend your assumption and show how my logical argument against it falls apart?
A demon did not come out of the mouth of The False Prophet, frogs did. John says the frogs are unclean spirits. The unclean spirits came out of the mouths of demons, not humans. There is not one mention whatsoever of a human (or Mary) within Rev 16:13-14..
Why in the world do you cram a human being into Rev 16? It makes no sense to me.
Let’s look at Rev 16:13-14 again. Can you show me one glimmer of a “human being” in Rev 16?
Revelation 16:13-14
And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet three unclean spirits like frogs.
For they are the spirits of demons performing signs that go out to the kings of the whole inhabited world, to gather them for the battle of the great day of God the All-Powerful.
What John saw via his vision:
1. The Dragon
2. The Beast
3. The False Prophet
4. Three frogs
What John mentions these visions represent:
A. Unclean spirits
B. Demons
Where is a human ever even mentioned in this defining and critical verse?
It says it right there. The unclean spirits (The Frogs) were the spirits of the demons (The Dragon, The Beast and The False Prophet. I don’t understand where you come up with a human body at all. Can you explain it? Aren’t you just assuming that’s what John meant, contrary to what he says that he meant? That’s what it looks like to me.
The false prophet has a demon spirit, and is possessed with a demon spirit.
If you assume The False Prophet is a human, I guess I can see your take here. I don’t make that assumption. Especially since there is not one mention whatsoever in Rev 16:13-14 of humans.
Technically The False Prophet had an unclean spirit (a frog) come out of him. Nothing about being “possessed with a demon” in the text.
When the demon spirit came out of the mouth of the false prophet, did he die?
Again, this doesn’t technically match up to the text.
An unclean spirit (a frog) came out of the mouth of The False Prophet (a demon). As for “did he die”, aren’t you once again simply assuming that The False Prophet is a human? It looks that way.
The demon was not his spirit then!
Now, this is technically correct. That’s my point. The frog (the unclean spirit) is NOT the Demon, now is he?
If the demon that came out of the mouth of the false prophet was "his spirit", rather than a demon spirit in him, then his body would have died.
The demon is The False Prophet and the unclean spirit (a frog) is what came out of him. Again, where do you get “then his body would have died” from? Your assuming the FP is a human.
Jesus cast out seven demon spirits out of Mary, but Mary wasn't a demon.
Mary wasn’t a demon, right. But Rev 16:13-14 doesn’t mention Mary, now does it? And technically Jesus cast out seven demons from Mary, not seven demon spirits. But, regardless what’s your argument here?
Mary is human.
The false prophet is human.
Really? That’s it? Mary is a human, thus The False Prophet is a human? I don’t see any logic in that. Not to mention you cannot use the claim within your premises that support the claim. It’s called circular reasoning.
But I certainly see a lot of presupposition there. Regardless, John’s vision is of Frogs and dragons and such. Why bring in the long ending of Mark?
The false prophet worked miracles that people could see and he deceived them by these miracles.
Okay. I agree. However, I don’t see how that proves anything about what John says The False Prophet is in Rev 16:13-14. Are you suggesting that demons cannot deceive people?
For a person to be a human and be declared living or alive they must have a spirit and a body.
Just as the body without the spirit is dead.
Okay, I agree again. With these two statements But there’s not one stich of a mention of a human or for that matter anything other than an unclean spirit mentioned in Rev 16:12-14. Aren’t you still assuming The False Prophet is a human? But let’s go with something we can both agree one here. These two statements are accurate to the Word. Thus they are logical and true. Maybe that’s why I like them so much, IDK.
For a person to be a human and be declared living or alive they must have a spirit and a body.
Just as the body without the spirit is dead.
Then the beast was captured, and with him the false prophet who worked signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image. These two were cast alive into the lake of fire burning with brimstone.
Actually you just came up with another proof that The False Prophet is NOT a human. Think about it. The FP’s unclean spirit (the frogs) came out of the FP’s mouth way earlier in John’s vision. Wouldn’t that mean it should be declared dead, if it were human? However, the FP was seen by John’s vision as being
cast alive later on into the Fire. Good one!
The false prophet is a human being.
The false prophet has a demon spirit in him.
JLB
Oh no, back to your unproven pre-supposition again.
Again, Rev 16:13-14 says to me that The FP (the demon) had a frog (an unclean spirit) leave his mouth. It’s our job to understand what that literally means, not assume the FP is a demon possessed human being.
Especially since there’s a valid logical argument that seems to prove that the FP cannot be a human. Will you address that argument?