- Apr 22, 2011
- 30,578
- 16,300
I agree one is born of the Spirit and born of the flesh as in two different births and I can see where you are coming from with the embryonic fluid (water) of the first birth. But, what I am trying to show with John 3:5 is that many have been taught the word water there means being baptized in literal water, but the word baptism is not written there. I believe the word water in that verse means living water being the very word of God within all those scriptures I gave about living water being the very word of God like that also of Romans 10:13-17.But, you see, I don't have to resort to another book of the NT entirely to make sense of John 3:5; I've only to consider the verse carefully in its immediate context and what Jesus means is quite clear. In the immediate context of John 3:5, Jesus is answering Nicodemus's question about two births, distinguishing them as fleshly (of water) and spiritual (of the Spirit). To make John 3:5 about 1 John 5:5-8 is to both ignore and do violence to the actual context of Christ's words to Nicodemus.
Right.
Again, this is to impose on John 3:5 the words and thoughts of another writer from a different book of the NT while ignoring the immediate context of John 3:5. It's not necessary to getting at what Jesus meant in John 3:5 to add Ephesians 5:26 to it. We have only to read the next verse - John 3:6 - in order to understand what Jesus was saying in verse 5.
I'm not following you here... Yes, the Church has been made clean through the shed blood of Christ, the Word (John 1:1-3; Ephesians 1:7; 1 John 1:7; Hebrews 9:12-14). But the word - small "w" - the Bible, has no power of itself to sanctify a person.
Right. Water, by itself, has no salvific power.
I'm very big on full context and sometimes it takes some cross referencing to put it all together to understand just one single word like water.