I guess I just don't understand the basis of your line of thinking...sorry.
I know of several instances where baptized people shower their lack of repentance from sin...and a need to still repent.
Ananias and Sapphira, in Acts 5, and Simon of Acts 8.
But that isn't in line with your POV that repentance from sin is necessary before baptism in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of past sin.
(A POV I agree with).
Exactly what doctrine do you find to be false, as per the OP ?
Hey All,
I did make a mistake, which I went back and edited after I found it. So it should read as "doesn't" now.
Just as:
"I know of several instances where baptized people shower their lack of repentance from sin...and a need to still repent." Quote from Hopeful 2
I know you did not mean "shower."
I know of several instances where baptized people shower their lack of repentance from sin...and a need to still repent.
Ananias and Sapphira, in Acts 5, and Simon of Acts 8. Quote from Hopeful 2
Ananias and Sapphira - We are not told that they were baptized. You are making an assumption. I could counter your argument by saying they were not baptized. That is an assumption as well, and equally not proveable. Stalemate.
How ever, I actually counter with the truth as we do know it; that your position is unproven. I win the point, and you cannot prove yours to be true. Your argument is weakened.
Simon - Acts 8:13 Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done.
"Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, . . . "
Simon believed first, then was baptized. It is right there in the verse. You have weakened your argument so badly. I could accuse you of not reading the verse before trying to make it say the opposite of what it actually says. Based on Acts 8:13, you cannot prove me wrong.
This alone, in a debate, derails your whole argument.
"Exactly what doctrine do you find to be false, as per the OP ?" Quote from Hopeful 2
You argue that repentance is not enough for salvation (Ananias, Sapphira, and Simon) and now you don't know what you are arguing about? Go back and read the OP.
You know the truth hopeful 2. Your last question proves you know the truth.
The truth is you don't know what you are arguing about. To not know, but argue like you do know, is a lie. So much for sinless perfection.
I know I am being harsh with you. But you left me no choice. The debate is over.
Now I want to help you get back up. I don't leave a man down. ( Or a woman if that is the case.) Get up, let's put your armor back on, and you walk with me for a spell. Let's walk into glory together.
Keep walking everybody.
May God bless,
Taz