Prycejosh1987
Member
- Jul 28, 2020
- 960
- 191
No it is not okay. Just as Paul said women should not be leaders over men, they should not be heads of the house. A womens attitude and personality cannot lead but supports.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
I think women should be the head of the house. That way if they get a divorce she has to pay alimony and half of her retirement to the husband.they should not be heads of the house
Then as the disciples conclude, it's better not get married at all. Contrary to popular contemporary teaching that often idealizes, romanticizes even worships marriage as a "foretaste of heaven", marriage is the hallmark of the present age. In the resurrection there'd be no marriage, because there'd be no sin, no death, no need for procreation, and no need for sexual one-flesh union, the real foretaste of the kingdom to come is celibacy.No it is not okay. Just as Paul said women should not be leaders over men, they should not be heads of the house. A womens attitude and personality cannot lead but supports.
Paul said: " From now on those who have wives should live as if they had none." 1 Corinthians 7:29 It is better to be married but do not expect anything from that marriage. Act as if you were not married. Just as we should not seek to be rich or poor.Then as the disciples conclude, it's better not get married at all.
Just keep the marital status quo.It is better to be married but do not expect anything from that marriage. Act as if you were not married.
It is as if people go one way or the other. Either their marriage is the best thing that ever happened to them or the worst. For me I think of her as a room mate and that is fine because I would rather not live alone. Even if we do have to put on this show when people are around that everything is so wonderful.Just keep the marital status quo.
Marriage is not the telos of life, nor an idol to worship, nor a fix for your loneliness, nor a ticket to middle class, nor a political platform to combat progressive liberalism. Sadly, it has become all four of these in most evangelical churches.It is as if people go one way or the other. Either their marriage is the best thing that ever happened to them or the worst. For me I think of her as a room mate and that is fine because I would rather not live alone. Even if we do have to put on this show when people are around that everything is so wonderful.
It was a ticket for my wife. She makes more in a week here than she made in a month in Hong Kong.nor a ticket to middle class
Good for you, I'm not interested in your stories.It was a ticket for my wife. She makes more in a week here than she made in a month in Hong Kong.
It seems you've missed a critical teaching on marriage, which has led you to a wrong conclusion:Then as the disciples conclude, it's better not get married at all. Contrary to popular contemporary teaching that often idealizes, romanticizes even worships marriage as a "foretaste of heaven", marriage is the hallmark of the present age. In the resurrection there'd be no marriage, because there'd be no sin, no death, no need for procreation, and no need for sexual one-flesh union, the real foretaste of the kingdom to come is celibacy.
In the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven. (Matt. 22:30)
For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. (Matt. 24:38-39)
This is to misunderstand Paul's argument. As he says elsewhere:Paul said: " From now on those who have wives should live as if they had none." 1 Corinthians 7:29 It is better to be married but do not expect anything from that marriage. Act as if you were not married.
Union with Christ, not an imaginary godly spouse. What really foreshadows heaven is celibacy, as there's no marriage in heave. Marriage is a burden and a distraction, one cannot serve two masters.It's a metaphor that points to the union of Christ with the Church.
I am sure I do. If I had not remarried my first son may still be alive but I would not have my second son now. I talked to Paul about what he says in Romans but I never asked him personally about this chapter in Cor. Other than to read it over and over again many times and to pray for understanding.This is to misunderstand Paul's argument.
I have no idea what you're saying here.Union with Christ, not an imaginary godly spouse.
It doesn't follow that because there is no marriage in heaven that celibacy foreshadows heaven.What really foreshadows heaven is celibacy, as there's no marriage in heave.
It's also a metaphor for Christ and the Church, and as such is beautiful and provides much fulfilment and enjoyment. It is not something everyone can handle or everyone is mature enough for.Marriage is a burden and a distraction,
Use the Bible correctly. There is nothing about being married as serving another master.one cannot serve two masters.
I am fairly sure you don't. You said: "It is better to be married but do not expect anything from that marriage. Act as if you were not married." Not only does Paul nowhere imply that a person should "not expect anything from that marriage," but actually states that one is to expect things from that marriage.I am sure I do.
I'm not sure what this has to do with anything.If I had not remarried my first son may still be alive but I would not have my second son now. I talked to Paul about what he says in Romans but I never asked him personally about this chapter in Cor. Other than to read it over and over again many times and to pray for understanding.
You're fallaciously begging the question. All the verses you posted are teachings about relationship of husband and wife in marriage, that's the absolute premise. I was asking you, what about singles who don't have a spouse, how are these verses relative to them? It is you who have misunderstood Paul's argument, as 1 Cor. 7:25-40 is his advice to singles and widows, while you're spamming marriage advice.I have no idea what you're saying here.
I don't follow how earthly marriage foreshadows heaven, where there's no earthly marriage, and the Sadducees failed to understand that.It doesn't follow that because there is no marriage in heaven that celibacy foreshadows heaven.
No it's not, it brings forth trouble in the flesh, especially in the present distress. Singleness on the other hand, is a gift for those who can handle it. (Matt. 19:12)It's also a metaphor for Christ and the Church, and as such is beautiful and provides much fulfilment and enjoyment. It is not something everyone can handle or everyone is mature enough for.
Correctly speaking, marriage is a burden and distraction, Paul urged the church to be eschatalogically oriented, setting their mind on eternity, not the cares of this world, and the paramount of all these cares is pursing and pleasing a mate, which in perhaps nine out ten cases, is motivated by peer pressure or lustful desire, not any godly inspiration. Paul's attitude is clear, marriage is merely permitted, not recommended, preferred or celebrated.Use the Bible correctly. There is nothing about being married as serving another master.
1Co 7:28 But if you do marry, you have not sinned, and if a betrothed woman marries, she has not sinned. Yet those who marry will have worldly troubles, and I would spare you that. (ESV)
How so, exactly?You're fallaciously begging the question.
All I posted to you were three passages which show that the Church is the Bride of Christ. I even said that marriage is "a metaphor that points to the union of Christ with the Church."All the verses you posted are teachings about relationship of husband and wife in marriage, that's the absolute premise.
No, you never asked me about them or how those verses apply to them.I was asking you, what about singles who don't have a spouse, how are these verses relative to them?
Then show exactly how I have misunderstood Paul's argument. What marriage advice am I "spamming"?It is you who have misunderstood Paul's argument, as 1 Cor. 7:25-40 is his advice to singles and widows, while you're spamming marriage advice.
Because it is a metaphor for Christ and the Church. We are the Bride prepared for Christ who will live with him forever. I gave verses which show all this.I don't follow how earthly marriage foreshadows heaven, where there's no earthly marriage, and the Sadducees failed to understand that.
Yes it is. I gave the verses where Paul says it is. Disagree with Paul all you want.No it's not, it brings forth trouble in the flesh, especially in the present distress.
For some, for those who can handle it without becoming bitter and attacking marriage every chance they get.Singleness on the other hand, is a gift for those who can handle it. (Matt. 19:12)
I would love to see how you arrived at your statistic. How many people did you interview, in how many churches, in how many cities, in how many countries?Correctly speaking, marriage is a burden and distraction, Paul urged the church to be eschatalogically oriented, setting their mind on eternity, not the cares of this world, and the paramount of all these cares is pursing and pleasing a mate, which in perhaps nine out ten cases, is motivated by peer pressure or lustful desire, not any godly inspiration.
"Permitted, not recommended"? You hold a much too low, unbiblical view of marriage. It's not hard to see why. Marriage is a God-given gift for companionship, unity, love, and procreation.Paul's attitude is clear, marriage is merely permitted, not recommended, preferred or celebrated.
Ignoring the context, as I pointed out in post #95.But this I say, brethren, the time is short, so that from now on even those who have wives should be as though they had none. (1 Cor. 7:29)
What you ignore in the last verse is that "he who marries his betrothed does well."And this I say for your own profit, not that I may put a leash on you, but for what is proper, and that you may serve the Lord without distraction. (1 Cor. 7:35)
So then he who gives her in marriage does well, but he who does not give her in marriage does better. (1 Cor. 7:38)
This is what he said. You are free to understand that any way you want. "29What I mean, brothers and sisters, is that the time is short. From now on those who have wives should live as if they do not; 30those who mourn, as if they did not; those who are happy, as if they were not; those who buy something, as if it were not theirs to keep; 31those who use the things of the world, as if not engrossed in them. For this world in its present form is passing away."His statement in 1 Cor. 7:29
Yes of course, everything Paul says is true or it would not be in the Bible. 2 Peter 3:15–16, saying that Paul's letters contain "some things that are hard to understand," which some people twist to their own destruction. I know Paul himself is concerned with wanting people to understand what He says in his epistles.If a married person wants to use that to say that they should live as though they weren't married, then they must also not mourn, not rejoice, ignore the goods they buy, and don't have any dealings with the world (vv. 30-31).
"Let each man have his own wife, and let each woman have her own husband" is not guaranteed for everyone, God doesn't owe everyone a spouse, nor is He obligated to bless everyone a spouse.How so, exactly?
All irrelevant, different context. I posted to you 1 Cor. 7:25-40, "concerning VIRGINS".All I posted to you were three passages which show that the Church is the Bride of Christ. I even said that marriage is "a metaphor that points to the union of Christ with the Church."
"It's better not get married at all” comes from Matt. 19:10 in the context of celibacy, not marriage. You changed the subject.No, you never asked me about them or how those verses apply to them.
Again, you changed the subject from the context of celibacy in Matt. 19:10-12 to unsolicited marriage advice. Read what you've spammed yourself.Then show exactly how I have misunderstood Paul's argument. What marriage advice am I "spamming"?
And I gave verses to show that earthly marriage is a distraction. Anyone who wanna be prepared for Christ should be devoted to Christ, not anybody else.Because it is a metaphor for Christ and the Church. We are the Bride prepared for Christ who will live with him forever. I gave verses which show all this.
So did I. Disagree with Paul all you want.Yes it is. I gave the verses where Paul says it is. Disagree with Paul all you want.
What "marriage" are you talking about exactly? Lord Jesus was attacking the Pharisee's frivolous marriage, where "it is lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason", in other words, no-fault divorce, a convenient tool for them to remarry as many times with many women as they wished without technically committing adultery. What I attack is the idealization, romanticization and corruption of marriage, not the original design of marriage. Unfortunately you don't seem to know the difference.For some, for those who can handle it without becoming bitter and attacking marriage every chance they get.
Only God knows the heart, no statistics can faithfully and accurately reflect everyone's motive. I'm just telling you, "metaphor for Christ and the Church" is nothing but pious justification and virtue signaling for peer pressure or lustful desire. If one's determined to live with Christ forever, with undivided devotion, then that "forever" starts here and now; get married to Christ in this life, not the next.I would love to see how you arrived at your statistic. How many people did you interview, in how many churches, in how many cities, in how many countries?
No, it's a false idol, an unrealistic expectation too heavy to bear for average people who can't afford it. My bible taught me that we're complete in marriage with Christ Jesus, not marriage with any flawed human being."Permitted, not recommended"? You hold a much too low, unbiblical view of marriage. It's not hard to see why. Marriage is a God-given gift for companionship, unity, love, and procreation.
Says you who ignored the context of singleness in Matt. 19:10-12 and 1 Cor. 7:25-40Ignoring the context, as I pointed out in post #95.
"He who does not give her in marriage does BETTER," also in the last verse.What you ignore in the last verse is that "he who marries his betrothed does well."
Without marriage, there would not be anyone to devote to anything. We would go extinct as a species. I tell my son I should never have married your mom. He tells me that if I had not married his mom, then he would not be alive.And I gave verses to show that earthly marriage is a distraction. Anyone who wanna be prepared for Christ should be devoted to Christ, not anybody else.