WHERE does Genesis 4 state anything of what you've written above?
Those that add to scripture will eventually come to believe their own understanding of scripture instead of what is clearly written.
Genesis 4:3-4
Both Cain and Able bring offerings to the Lord.
they both knew the Lord and brought an offering to Him.
It only states that God had regard for Abel and his offering and not for Cain's,,,
which is what angered Cain. We cannot know why. Abel brought a CHOICE offering.
They both apparently believed in God and knew to make a sacrifice to Him.
Genesis 4:7
God tells Caine IF YOU DO WELL, will you not be accepted?
And if you DO NOT DO WELL,,,,temptation will be waiting at the door.
It's ready to damage you if you do not MASTER IT.
Cain did not obey God and allowed his anger to fester,,,which lead to his killing of his brother.
We learn from this account that we must learn to control ourselves and not let sin enter into our heart.
Once again,,,,scripture speaks of DOING WELL, as God commands.
Cain most probably felt that Abel's sacrifice was BETTER than his.
No talk of one having faith and one not having faith.
No talk of one being saved and one not being saved.
Temptation is waiting at the door.
"If you DO WELL, you will be accepted."
Genesis 4:7
I do not see where "mailman" distorted Scripture. I do see where he did a deeper study of "why" Cains offering was refused.
Over years, great men of God had worked to explain this act.
Was it the "type" of offering.....blood verses fruits/food?
Was it the quality....the food was not eatable or spoiled?
Was it the quantity....not enough food?
Was it because of the HEART of the person making the offering as God know all of our thoughts?
Genesis 1:2-7....
"Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. And in the process of time it came to pass that Cain brought an offering of the fruit of the ground to the Lord. Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat. And the Lord respected Abel and his offering, but He did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell. So the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen? If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it.”
Lets dig deeper. Elsewhere we read in Hebrews 11:4......
“By faith Abel offered to God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain”.
Then in 1 John 3:11-12.......
"For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.
Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous."
So then, was Cains offering the wrong TYPE?
Fact is that there’s no verse that says, “God rejected Cain’s offering because it wasn’t meaty or bloody enough.” We like to think it is about the "Blood" however, Scripture never says that God had required them to sacrifice, nor (if He had) that He specified the type of sacrifice.
Was Cain’s offering rejected because it was not of superior quality?
Scripture indeed tells us that Abel brought the 1st born and of their fat. I am one who says that Cain brought the very best food/fruit he was able to grow. But once again, Scripture never makes the connection explicit, so this explanation remains speculative—albeit backed by more circumstantial evidence and reasonable assumptions based on Scripture.
So we are at The Heart of the Matter
While we’ve seen some implied and circumstantial and assumed evidence for why God rejected Cain’s offering, the New Testament comes to the rescue in giving more explicit reasons for why Cain’s offering was rejected as we see in Hebrews 11:4......
"By faith Abel offered to God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, through which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts; and through it he being dead still speaks. "
1 John 3:11-12........
"For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.
12 Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother's righteous."
Even with all this circumstantial evidence, we don’t absolutely know that God required a blood sacrifice of Cain.
We can’t say for certain that the quality of Cain’s offering was inferior.
And we can’t prove Cain’s heart was in the wrong
during the sacrifice itself.
Although the scriptural account does seem to point to each of these reasons, we can’t be emphatic about any of them which is way I say.....
..dont plant your feet in a box of cement on anything assumed!.
So, what’s the ultimate answer to God preferring Abel’s offering?
The Soventry of God's wisdom!