I think we're gonna disagree on this, but I don't believe the Bible outright condemns tattoos. So therefore, it is a matter of one's convictions by the Spirit, plus considerations on what effect it will have on the Body around them, and as a wittiness to non believers.
The conscience of our brothers:
A man consulted a doctor.
“I’ve been misbehaving, Doc, and my conscience is troubling me,” he complained.
“And you want something that will strengthen your willpower?” asked the doctor.
“Well, no,” said the fellow.
“I was thinking of something that would weaken my conscience.”
What's the prescription for this amusing anecdote? Would it be a healthy dose of Romans 14?
Paul’s prescription in this chapter is far from that sought by the fellow just mentioned. He does not praise the overly sensitive conscience of the weak, nor does he condemn it. He accepts Christians where they are in their walk of faith and pleads with us to do the same. It's a chapter about the relationship between the strong and the weak.
Some may come and say, "But where did Paul speak about tattoos." To them, I would reply in my best Hervé Villechaize voice,
"It's so plane, boss. It's so plain." (Fantasy Island TV Series).
Nick, I do understand what you're saying about cultural difference. I'm not there and am very willing to take your word for it. I know you call it as you see it. I've actually relaxed my position because of what you mention being seen here in the States too. Change is a fine line to walk. Getting stuck in the mud is too often more than a stereotype for those my age.
If the principle that is spoken of in Rom 14 considering our
brothers does not directly apply to tattoos (as much as it once did)? It does not take much imagination to think of a dozen or more things it does apply to. Tats are a reasonable opportunity to teach principle vs. legalism.
Not going too far off the deep end, I hope, but what about stilettos or cross-dressing or wearing all leather, letting one's beard grow and riding Harley's (in a gang) or wearing all black clothing or other things that I know little about but may readily signify group affiliation? Looking like a blood or a crip? Or for that matter, like a skinhead, or a momma-bear or any of the other groups that can be seen readily on any campus? I've seen pseudo-intellectuals, LGBT, anarchists and have even seen Christians. I identified the Christians by their look and the fact that they openly sang praises to God on campus. I was a little taken aback when 2 of their group "laid hands" on one of the campus buildings and prayed over it, but who am I to judge? I just asked, "May I ask what you're doing?" and they told me. Seriously.
I've also spotted jailbirds and 420 friendlies. It's an easy task to acquire an "eye" for it. OOPS, I almost forgot the foreign exchange students and their flair for dressing and identity. Some you don't have to see but can tell from the sound their shoes make as they walk.
In many cases, tattoos are a way to place protective or therapeutic symbols permanently on the body.
What I'm trying to say, and maybe not saying it well, is that it is good to consider God in all things. As far as I know, any one of the people that I mentioned could be a believer. Without talking and going only by what is seen by the eye? How could I know? And if they are not? They
could be fertile soil. Should I stomp when the Lord does
not tell me to? I would think no. But and yet, we are indeed instructed to not judge by the eye, nor by the ear, but to make righteous judgments. Only way to do this is by the Spirit of God. I know of no other way.
So if I am strong and know that idols are not my concern because they are not alive but dead and and if I am tolerant and willing to speak to many in all kinds of groups, (to become all things to all people) would it be good for me to consider the weaker brother and to ensure that my liberty does not a stumbling block make? Some are servants, that's good. Some are friends of the master of the house and that's better. What is the cost of friendship? Of brotherhood?