I'd love you to give a URL of any commentator that agrees with the following statement you made:
Sorry Fastfredy0, just noticed you reply, so am responding now.
Anyway, for the most part, I place very little credence in commentators so seldom use them for reference - I won't be able to satisfy your question on that basis. According to the Bible however, it is complete within in itself and as such, is all that is needed for our spiritual understanding.
I read the context of the chapter and Jesus is talking to Nicodemus (sp?) about being 'born again'. The verse itself says "God sent" and not "God will send" where a future tense would be needed if the verses were about the new world to come.
Yes, Jesus was sent to this world but only to save those people who are to be the citizens of the world to come. Christ's kingdom will be there, not here. Had Christ not done so, then there would be no world to come because there would
be no kingdom to come. This world is to be destroyed and gone, with only the world to come to remain, and by that, He is the Saviour of the world.
The problem with perceiving this world as the one that God "so loved" is that by His loving of it and sending Christ as its Saviour, He then can't destroy it as He has told us He would because Christ would be its Saviour, or conversely, He can't love it as He said He does and had accepted Christ's offering to save it and then destroy it - both can't be true. But we know the answer to that because God only loves that which is justified by Christ, and that can only be the world to come not this world.
[Jhn 18:36 KJV] 36 Jesus answered,
My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
[Mar 10:30 KJV] 30 But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions;
and in the world to come eternal life.
[1Jo 2:15-17 KJV]
15
Love not the world, neither the things [that are] in the world.
If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
16 For all that [is] in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life,
is not of the Father, but is of the world.
17
And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.
[2Pe 3:10, 12 KJV]
10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the
heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. ...
12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the
heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
Aside: the word "world" in
John 3:16-17 is one of 4ish major verses "free will" people use to deny Reformed theology, but your defense is new to me.
Actually, what I am saying is the polar opposite of that. They say that because of the "whoever" and "loves the world"
parts, without understanding what they represent.