- Apr 2, 2003
- 22,660
- 6,019
I would like to see such evidence of these supposed denominational positions regarding the Trinity. I have a strong feeling that either you have not fully read them or not fully understood them.To dismiss "polytheism" as a "religious word" is nonsensical. It is a total evasion of the seriousness of the contradiction that has been posited. And it appears that the contradiction isn't going to be dealt with.
Because of you Free. I will jump back in. Only out of respect as I normally jump out and stay out. I see no reason to continue this Trinity discussion, I don't see how it can productive. We already established it's a Mystery and I posted several different denominational beliefs that are modern by todays standard, All calling it a mystery. The mystery part in all of them if you go back and read their literature and creeds is that 3 does not equal 1. Also their definition of "god" would need changed expect that each person in the trinity is separate, distinct and fully God. They already understand that by definition each distinct person that is called God would also have to be triune or else Not God by definition. This presents major issues to the Doctrine itself. Not my words but those that wrote the doctrine. I am using their own findings and arguments.
So it becomes a mystery that the human finite mind can not comprehend.
Needless to say, there is a lot of writings on the Trinity out there and I have not come across even one that believes if each person is fully God that they would also have to be triune.
It seems to me then that you have not understood this entire conversation. Again, I have not gone beyond anything that was understood by those who wrote the Trinity. Indeed, the very fact that they came up with the doctrine of the Trinity is because of the very biblical passages that I have presented. And many more besides. I have said this already yet you did not address it.I have people here trying to explain something that those that wrote the doctrine already know you can't explain it. That is why I don't see a point to continue, because if it's a mystery that is a foreign concept to human reasoning then A) You accept it for what it is. Or B) you have to redefine who and what you always believed God to be.
I really don't know what your point is here.Isa 43:10-11, 10 "You are my witnesses," declares the LORD, "and my servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he. Before me no god was formed, nor shall there be any after me. 11 I, I am the LORD, and besides me there is no savior.
One God, one Saviour, One creator, there is no other God formed nor shall any be.
We examine that in fact by scripture there is only One God who created everything, and by whom we are saved. No question here. None made like him, none before or after Him. ONE.
1Co 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.
This scripture says the same exact thing. There is ONE GOD by whom are all things. One that made everything and everything by HIM. NO other God, No other creator. We have Jesus our Lord by whom are all things, or through him are all things and we came to God because of Him.
God is the Saviour...................... How did the ONE God the creator save us?
Act_3:26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.
The Creator, the Saviour "RAISED UP" His son. Not Sent Himself as the Creator did not need raised up. He sent His actual Son. By whom The ONE GOD, Creator of all things, made everything because and for His Son by whom the ONE GOD made an heir of all things.
Jesus was not confused at all...................... It's a Doctrine of man that is called a mystery that confuses the issue.
Joh_17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
ONE GOD that Sent his Son. There is no other God like the creator, no other God that saved us but the ONE GOD, The Father, The Creator having raised up A son for us and sent Him to us.
Joh 17:5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
This is Jesus, the Son of God who had always been with the Father, the Creator, whom the Creator gave glory to before the earth was even formed.
Missing is the other part of God in all these verses about glory and being raised up. The one that don't have a throne. That is God's Spirit, the Holy Spirit. Because He belongs to God.
Wow, you certainly don't seem to understand the fact that words have different meanings based on context. That is an elementary principle of biblical interpretation. Another basic principle is that clear passages of Scripture are used to bring understanding to those that are less clear or ambiguous. But you are going about that backwards.Bible only teaches there is ONE GOD:
Wrong!!! The bible teachers there is only One God the Father, the creator. The definition of God used in the bible is ONE of something not triune in nature. Not one place is Triune or Trinity is used to describe God or the concept of a god. The Holy Spirit used different words. None denote a triune being, not even close.
2Co_4:4 In whom the god (Theos some name given to God the Father) of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.
In whom the "What" of this World............................. GOD. Satan is not a triune being. That makes two gods at least if the creator is somehow triune by the mystery we are told.
Well, ......... Satan is not God brother Mike... I mean come on, really. He is just god of this Word, but not god.
Then you be the one to tell the Holy Spirit He should have used a different Greek word. Tell him He is Wrong when you talk to him. Theos ..... A deity of uncertain origin. The Holy Spirit could have used a number of different words.
Does a deity of uncertain origin sound Triune to you?
Joh 10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? (In response to accusing him of making himself to be God)
There are now 3 Gods. A triune God, Us and Satan...............Theos..
Well, Jesus did not mean we are god.... He just meant that we are something, something who knows, but not god. Go talk to Jesus about it, tell him He used the wrong Word.
God is not defined in the bible as Triune. It is defined as a class of something, given with the title. The bible defines more than one type of thing in that class. Trinity says there is only one God made up of 3 other distinct Gods.
I'll take the scripture over the mystery. I hope this is enough. (God had to raise up a Part of himself to send Himself in the flesh...... wow) It certainly is a mystery.
Mike.
I have given several passages which clearly and unambiguously state that there is only one God. There is no other way to understand those passages.
As for what else elohim and theos could refer to:
Ex 20:3-5, 3 "You shall have no other gods before me.
4 "You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generation of those who hate me," (ESV)
Deut 4:28 And there you will serve gods of wood and stone, the work of human hands, that neither see, nor hear, nor eat, nor smell. (ESV)
Deut 28:36 "The Lord will bring you and your king whom you set over you to a nation that neither you nor your fathers have known. And there you shall serve other gods of wood and stone." (ESV)
Deut 28:64 "And the Lord will scatter you among all peoples, from one end of the earth to the other, and there you shall serve other gods of wood and stone, which neither you nor your fathers have known."(ESV)
1 Ch 16:25-26, 25 For great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised, and he is to be feared above all gods.
26 For all the gods of the peoples are worthless idols, but the Lord made the heavens. (ESV)
So in all the above we see that the gods people serve that are not the one true God, are all worthless idols, often carved from wood and stone. We could talk of the Golden Calf and all sorts of other passages but that should suffice.
So then, when we come to a passage such as 1 Cor 8:4-5, we need to keep the above in mind:
4 Therefore, as to the eating of food offered to idols, we know that "an idol has no real existence," and that "there is no God but one."
5 For although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth—as indeed there are many "gods" and many "lords"—(ESV)
Now, you have in a previous post taken issue with the ESV's insertion of "so-called," but as you can see, your concern is without basis. Even verse 4 makes this clear so it really is a non-issue just with that, but to back it up further is the abundant Scriptural evidence that these "gods" really are "so-called" and are not actual gods at all.
And just to make sure we're clear on Paul's position, Acts 19:23-27:
23 About that time there arose no little disturbance concerning the Way.
24 For a man named Demetrius, a silversmith, who made silver shrines of Artemis, brought no little business to the craftsmen.
25 These he gathered together, with the workmen in similar trades, and said, "Men, you know that from this business we have our wealth.
26 And you see and hear that not only in Ephesus but in almost all of Asia this Paul has persuaded and turned away a great many people, saying that gods made with hands are not gods.
27 And there is danger not only that this trade of ours may come into disrepute but also that the temple of the great goddess Artemis may be counted as nothing, and that she may even be deposed from her magnificence, she whom all Asia and the world worship." (ESV)
Gal 4:8 Formerly, when you did not know God, you were enslaved to those that by nature are not gods. (ESV)
Moving on then to what Jesus said in John 10:34:
34 Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I said, you are gods'? (ESV)
The key question here is: Who did he say this to? He was speaking to "the Jews," as the translations read. Likely the Jewish leaders but it doesn't really matter. What we can be certain about is that he was not speaking to a class of beings that are gods. He was speaking to Jews, nothing more.
Here Jesus is quoting Ps 82:6:
6 I said, "You are gods, sons of the Most High, all of you;"
But what is important here is the context:
1 A Psalm of Asaph. God has taken his place in the divine council; in the midst of the gods he holds judgment:
2 "How long will you judge unjustly and show partiality to the wicked? Selah
3 Give justice to the weak and the fatherless; maintain the right of the afflicted and the destitute.
4 Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked."
5 They have neither knowledge nor understanding, they walk about in darkness; all the foundations of the earth are shaken.
6 I said, "You are gods, sons of the Most High, all of you;
7 nevertheless, like men you shall die, and fall like any prince." (ESV)
I know I could go back and find where you said Satan was a god and therefore immortal, and I will if I have to, but here we can see that these "gods" will die "like men, and fall like any prince."
This is a little ambiguous, so we turn to what is clear to make sense of it. What is clear is that there is only one God, that there are no others, and that the gods of the pagans are worthless idols. We also know that in Jesus' quoting of this passage, in speaking to the Jews, he used it to reference the Jews. In other words, Jesus clearly used Ps 82:6 as though it was speaking of the Jews, of men.
And we see hints of this in Ps 82:7. We know that the judges of Israel were referred to as gods. In that time and culture those who were rulers were thought of as gods. See Ps 45:6, for example. Look up the use of elohim and you will see that it is translated as "judges" in a few places.
So when we come to 2 Cor 4:4 where Paul refers to Satan as "the god of this world," we again refer to that which is clear and that which has been affirmed throughout Scripture. Satan cannot be considered an actual god. This goes against everything else the Bible says. It is quite likely that Paul is referring to the fact that the world sets up Satan as though he is a god, that he is given control of the people of this world by their rejection of Jesus.
And on it goes. So, no, there is no class of beings that are actual gods. There was, is, and ever will be only one God. This is a truth that is affirmed throughout Scripture.