These verses seem to be talking about if someone says "theyve never sinned before".
I don't see anything indicating people saying "never sinning again from repentance, onward"
Here is Wuest's translation of 1 John 1:8-10:
If we say that sin we are not having, ourselves we are leading astray, and the truth is not in us. If we continue to confess our sins, faithful is He and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from every unrighteousness. If we say that we have not sinned and are now in a state where we do not sin, a liar we are making Him, and His word is not in us.
The point is, there is no distinction being made about sins before conversion and sins after. Therefore, it is referring to all sinning before
and after conversion.
Yes, it does. What don't you understand about the context?
And, see that "cleanse us from ALL unrighteousness"?
Hopeful 2 Take notes. ;)
Is that addressed to me as well? If so, I'm not sure what your point is.
What sins was Hopeful calling "Not a sin"?
All his sins.
Does God "auto forgive" the believer if they accidentally sin?
Why should he?
Why didn't the translators catch your "keep on"?? How many translations have that vs how many do not?
Most don't have it stated explicitly, although it can be said to be implied in the ambiguousness of English. You'll notice that Wuest's translation does explicitly state it; it's the only translation I have that does. It's a translation committees decision, so you would have to ask them why they didn't make the full meaning more clear. I suspect that because most seem to try to stick with a "word-for-word" translation as much as possible, they didn't want to add the extra wording in. Some things do get lost in translation, which is why proper study is necessary.
From Robertson's Word Pictures: '
If we confess (
ean homologōmen). Third-class condition again with
ean and present active subjunctive of
homologeō, “if we keep on confessing.”'
That's a very heavy charge. What Scripture demonstrates this?
The easier question is: What Scripture doesn't demonstrate this? Most of the commands in the NT demonstrate this; it is one of the main reasons for all those books having been written.
We also see Paul's struggles in Romans 7 and his confronting Peter's sin in Gal 2. We have John's clear statements in 1 John 2:1 and 5:16. Also, from James:
Jas 5:16 Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. (ESV)
Jas 5:16 Be confessing to one another the trespasses, and be praying for one another, that ye may be healed; very strong is a working supplication of a righteous man; (YLT)
Notice also this from Paul, writing to believers:
1Co 11:20 When you come together, it is not the Lord's supper that you eat.
1Co 11:21 For in eating, each one goes ahead with his own meal. One goes hungry,
another gets drunk.
1Co 11:22 What! Do you not have houses to eat and drink in?
Or do you despise the church of God and humiliate those who have nothing? What shall I say to you?
Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not.
...
1Co 11:27
Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord.
1Co 11:28 Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.
1Co 11:29 For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself.
1Co 11:30
That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died. (ESV)
1Co 11:30 That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have
fallen asleep. (NIV)
The Greek word translated as "died" ("fallen asleep" or "sleep" in the NIV, NASB, KJV) is
koimaō, and means to "fall asleep," "be asleep," "to put to sleep." It's used 18 times in the NT, mostly for referring to believers who have died. So, notice the effects of sinning while participating in the Lord's Supper.
What EXTRA-Biblical evidence has proven this?
The life of every Christian believer who has ever lived. Just a deep, hard, honest look at your own life or read some autobiographies if you're unwilling to do the former.
What fruits do you think "True Believers Never sinning AGAIN" belief has bore?
Very bad fruit, based on exactly what John himself states in 1 John 1:8, 9. A professed believer who truly believes they have never sinned after being saved is self-deceived, doesn't have the truth in them, makes God a liar, and doesn't have his word in them.
This could lead many new believers astray, as it really means that there is no such thing as sin after becoming a Christian. It's to say that the sins they are continually committing as a professed believer aren't actually sins. That is why John says they are self-deceived and make God a liar.
Why do you hate the belief that Christians can 'quit sinning from repentance onward' so much?
Because it goes against the clear teaching of Scripture and makes God a liar. It's about what the Bible says, not what I think.
Hopeful 2 is not teaching that the "sinning no more Christian" never sinned ONCE in their life. He's saying that believers can sin "NO MORE".
I know what he's saying.
I doubt your heavy charge is taught there.
It clearly is.
Struggling with committing it, or struggling with temptation and the effects of sin in general?
All the above.
And if the believer struggles with sin, but doesn't actually do any sin, he hasn't sinned. Struggling with it doesn't necessitate caving to doing it.
And, yet, every believer continues to struggle with sinning.
So, given this, it does not seem much of an arg against Hopeful's "believers can sin no more" teaching.
Given what? You have only given your opinion and no Scripture.
Why?
If Hopeful's teaching is correct, Born Again Believers will always follow them.
Because, if the writers of the NT have to continually remind believers to not sin, it's because they struggle with sinning. If believers just stopped sinning, then there would be no need to write commands to stop sinning.
It's more likely the "sin-stuck believers" theory does that.
And what do you have to provide to the discussion?