Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jesus promise: Recipients of eternal life will never perish!

The 'them ' are His followers.. following is a active word.. something that is ongoing .. IS a follower following when he stops following
 
I asked this:
"What was the condition for Jesus' promise of never perishing in Jn 10:28?"

OK, what was the condition of those who receive His promise?


No.


Generally.


But you do understand that to "follow Him" requires a lifestyle and period of time. That contradicts what Jesus said in John 5:24.

And contradicts Jesus' promise in Jn 10:28, where recipients of etenral life are promised to never perish.

So, please reconcile your claims with Jesus' statement in Jn 5:24, then get back to me.
The condition of verse 28 is to be one of the verse 27 ones.

Do you honestly believe that Jesus said something that is "generally" true? Do you believe His next statement is also generally true?
 
When Jesus said "I give them eternal life", He was referring to those He gives eternal life. Those who are given something are RECIPIENTS of something.


Yes. And it proves eternal security.

To never perish is based solely on being a recipient of etenral life. That is exactly Jesus' promise.
Do you think that Jesus was not just speaking of those in verse 27, that there are others?

So if you believe that statement was correct, then do you also believe His sheep follow Him?
 
The issue in John 10:28 is how to avoid perishing. The way is to receive eternal life.

Once received, the recipient will never perish. Because Jesus promises that.

The issue of how one receives eternal life can be another thread. But v.28 teaches eternal security in the plainest and clearest of terms.

He gives them eternal life means they will never perish.
 
The 'them ' are His followers.. following is a active word.. something that is ongoing .. IS a follower following when he stops following
No. So how does that change what Jesus promised in John 10:28?

If there is an attempt here to make a parallel betweens followers and believers who cease to follow/believe, this is what Jesus WOULD HAVE SAID in John 10:28 -
I give them (FOLLOWERS AND BELIEVERS) eternal life, and AS LONG AS they CONTINUE TO FOLLOW AND BELIEVE, they will never perish.

Do you see the point here? Jesus gave NO SUCH CONDITIONS for never perishing.

His promise is based solely on receiving eternal life in v.28. No other conditions.

How many verses shall I quote about believing on Him to have eternal life?

It seems the real issue of v.28 is being avoided. He promises that those He gives eternal life (THAT WOULD BE RECIPIENTS OF ETERNAL LIFE) will never perish. Period. No conditions beyond RECEPTION of eternal life.

Do you agree or disagree?

I'm NOT interested in those trying to force v.27 into some kind of a condition for never perishing. It can't be done rationally, or reasonably.

v.28 stands alone in how to NEVER PERISH. And that is to receive eternal life from Jesus.

Arguing how to receive eternal life is another discussion. My interest and focus is on the FACT that RECIPIENTS will NEVER PERISH.

That's the promise Jesus made. Agree or disagree? And why, if there is disagreement.
 
The condition of verse 28 is to be one of the verse 27 ones.
This is quite vague. Please spell out what is meant here.

Do you honestly believe that Jesus said something that is "generally" true?
How can it not be generally true? Why would He provide a parable where someone "believes for a while" if that weren't true?? Please answer.

Do you believe His next statement is also generally true?
v.28 is a statement of FACT. Recipients of eternal life will never perish.

Not generally, but every last one of the recipients.

If there are any exceptions, as I've shown for sheep who believe for a while, meaning they don't ALL follow Him all the time, then please share those exceptions that support your position that there are SOME RECIPIENTS who WILL PERISH.

I've proven my claim about v.27 being a general statement. Now, can you prove your claim that there are some recipients who will perish?

If you can, then we know that v.28 is also a general one.

Just because v.27 is a general statement and not applicable to every single sheep, doesn't mean the next verse MUST ALSO be a general statement where not all the recipients will not perish.
 
Verse 27 clearly tells us who are the recipients of the promise of verse 28...
Fine. Let's just focus on what Jesus promised in v.28.

Do you agree that Jesus promised that recipients of eternal life will never perish or not? This question does NOT require a definition of who the recipients of eternal life are, or how they became recipients.
 
Why do you claim that the words "eternal life" are not in Rom 11:29 yet do the same thing here? The reason the words "eternal life" are not needed in Rom 11:29 is because Paul already defined what he meant by God's gifts, which IS in 11:29, as well as in 6:23, the context for 11:29.
Context matters some times..

Here is another .. from here I have pointed out that Paul described 3 of God's gifts within the CONTEXT of the epistle to the Romans. And, in case you're not aware, 3 items fits withing the PLURAL (giftS), and therefore, cannot be dissociated from 11:29, as you'd seem to prefer.
 
Cherry picking verses and calling for context only when the context fits one's theology is not for me..
 
This is quite vague. Please spell out what is meant here.


How can it not be generally true? Why would He provide a parable where someone "believes for a while" if that weren't true?? Please answer.


v.28 is a statement of FACT. Recipients of eternal life will never perish.

Not generally, but every last one of the recipients.

If there are any exceptions, as I've shown for sheep who believe for a while, meaning they don't ALL follow Him all the time, then please share those exceptions that support your position that there are SOME RECIPIENTS who WILL PERISH.

I've proven my claim about v.27 being a general statement. Now, can you prove your claim that there are some recipients who will perish?

If you can, then we know that v.28 is also a general one.

Just because v.27 is a general statement and not applicable to every single sheep, doesn't mean the next verse MUST ALSO be a general statement where not all the recipients will not perish.
Jesus did say that some would believe and then fall away. Yet you think one of Jesus statements is general and conditional, yet the very next statement He says is specific and absolute.

FreeGrace that is called self-deception, and to teach it is to try and deceive others.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-deception

You cannot rationally think that one statement is not completely true, then the next statement is completely true, just to fit an ideology.


Here is what your getting. Jesus does have sheep, and they do follow Him, and He does give them eternal life.

Here is what your missing. Those who don't follow Christ, who are not in His flock, do not get eternal life.

It's not hard to understand that this is why John states eternal life is in Christ - whoever has the Son has life, whoever doesn't have the Son does not have life.
 
The bible does not teach eternal security. The word of God was around for 1,500 years before Mr. Calvin decided to think up this doctrine. So what do you think? Were all the theologians that came before him totally dumb?
Augustine said the same thing LONG before John Calvin.
There were Medieval Scholars who hinted at it in some writings, but the fear of being burned as a heretic tended to encourage them to later issue statements revising their positions. It wasn't until the Reformation that saying something contrary to the traditions of Rome was not fatal. Your fairy tale about John Calvin is inaccurate.

As an aside, sinning will not cost you your salvation in the Theology of the Roman Catholic Church. Only leaving the RCC will (or never being a member). Time in Pergatory is what is at stake. So you must blame John Calvin for messing up that little 'historic truth' as well.
 
Is there any verse within the context of v.28 that somehow changes the clear promise Jesus made in v.28?
Yes. Which is what she keeps telling you.

A verse needs to be read in context because it is only one small part of a much larger thought that the author is attempting to express. The very fact that it begins with "And" should be a hint that it is not even a complete sentence but a continuation of a thought.
 
The 'them ' are His followers.. following is a active word.. something that is ongoing .. IS a follower following when he stops following
Doesn't Jesus claim that "My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me." (John 10:27). So 'His sheep' could stop following in a theoretical sense, but Jesus claims that they will not. Hence statements like "and I will raise them up at the last day" (John 6:40, John 6:44, John 6:54).

(At what point does a sheep no longer belong to the shepherd?)
 
Back
Top