Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The condition of verse 28 is to be one of the verse 27 ones.I asked this:
"What was the condition for Jesus' promise of never perishing in Jn 10:28?"
OK, what was the condition of those who receive His promise?
No.
Generally.
But you do understand that to "follow Him" requires a lifestyle and period of time. That contradicts what Jesus said in John 5:24.
And contradicts Jesus' promise in Jn 10:28, where recipients of etenral life are promised to never perish.
So, please reconcile your claims with Jesus' statement in Jn 5:24, then get back to me.
Do you think that Jesus was not just speaking of those in verse 27, that there are others?When Jesus said "I give them eternal life", He was referring to those He gives eternal life. Those who are given something are RECIPIENTS of something.
Yes. And it proves eternal security.
To never perish is based solely on being a recipient of etenral life. That is exactly Jesus' promise.
Verse 27 clearly tells us who are the recipients of the promise of verse 28...Is there any verse within the context of v.28 that somehow changes the clear promise Jesus made in v.28?
The issue in John 10:28 is how to avoid perishing. The way is to receive eternal life.
Once received, the recipient will never perish. Because Jesus promises that.
The issue of how one receives eternal life can be another thread. But v.28 teaches eternal security in the plainest and clearest of terms.
No. So how does that change what Jesus promised in John 10:28?The 'them ' are His followers.. following is a active word.. something that is ongoing .. IS a follower following when he stops following
This is quite vague. Please spell out what is meant here.The condition of verse 28 is to be one of the verse 27 ones.
How can it not be generally true? Why would He provide a parable where someone "believes for a while" if that weren't true?? Please answer.Do you honestly believe that Jesus said something that is "generally" true?
v.28 is a statement of FACT. Recipients of eternal life will never perish.Do you believe His next statement is also generally true?
Fine. Let's just focus on what Jesus promised in v.28.Verse 27 clearly tells us who are the recipients of the promise of verse 28...
Yes, sir!! Eternal security for all recipients.He gives them eternal life means they will never perish.
What? Where?Jesus did say that He used two verses ..
Context matters some times..
Jesus did say that some would believe and then fall away. Yet you think one of Jesus statements is general and conditional, yet the very next statement He says is specific and absolute.This is quite vague. Please spell out what is meant here.
How can it not be generally true? Why would He provide a parable where someone "believes for a while" if that weren't true?? Please answer.
v.28 is a statement of FACT. Recipients of eternal life will never perish.
Not generally, but every last one of the recipients.
If there are any exceptions, as I've shown for sheep who believe for a while, meaning they don't ALL follow Him all the time, then please share those exceptions that support your position that there are SOME RECIPIENTS who WILL PERISH.
I've proven my claim about v.27 being a general statement. Now, can you prove your claim that there are some recipients who will perish?
If you can, then we know that v.28 is also a general one.
Just because v.27 is a general statement and not applicable to every single sheep, doesn't mean the next verse MUST ALSO be a general statement where not all the recipients will not perish.
Augustine said the same thing LONG before John Calvin.The bible does not teach eternal security. The word of God was around for 1,500 years before Mr. Calvin decided to think up this doctrine. So what do you think? Were all the theologians that came before him totally dumb?
Yes. Which is what she keeps telling you.Is there any verse within the context of v.28 that somehow changes the clear promise Jesus made in v.28?
Doesn't Jesus claim that "My sheep listen to my voice; I know them, and they follow me." (John 10:27). So 'His sheep' could stop following in a theoretical sense, but Jesus claims that they will not. Hence statements like "and I will raise them up at the last day" (John 6:40, John 6:44, John 6:54).The 'them ' are His followers.. following is a active word.. something that is ongoing .. IS a follower following when he stops following
when they leave the flock and the bad guy butcher gets them(At what point does a sheep no longer belong to the shepherd?)