theLords
Member
- Sep 12, 2010
- 4,720
- 1
Truth is subjective.
How sad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Truth is subjective.
Of course it isn't moral because it harms those who would have been killed. It makes people of no value. . . . . . . . which is understandable that you would suggest that since the bible hold no worth on human beings.
So you are saying the lives of a few million people today are worth more than the exponential number of lives that will be scourged by it in the future? How do you value human life? By the myopic viewpoint of the present tense? How many people are alive today right now breathing this very moment who do not have aids that WILL acquire it in their lifetimes. Doing this HIV/Aids holocaust spares them the disease. Have you ever had to tell someone they are HIV positive? It could all be avoided with one "tough decision" forevermore.
Of course, it is murder. But is it any less murder if you watch someone die when you could have saved them?
Humans value life? Is this incessant need for man to kill each other an example of just how much humans value life?
Not everyone has "an incessant need to kill others".
Lest we get into all the human lives that were ended by Hebrew travels to the "promised land". If you want to throw the into the mix, then it is understandable that men would be called evil.
Even if that standard is no longer moral to modern times? I understand that "good" is actually ONLY "being obedient" and has nothing to do with our actual understanding of what is good.
Of course it isn't moral because it harms those who would have been killed. It makes people of no value. . . . . . . . which is understandable that you would suggest that since the bible hold no worth on human beings.
History clearly shows that man cannot co-exist peacefully with man, hence man's "incessant need to kill others."
Sure, the Hebrew's are in the mix, I wasn't discounting the OT Bible, but as Believers who believe in absolute Truth, it's not an issue.
How does one with subjective truth establish any basis of good within himself when history shows that man is not good? Your logic is not the same logic that another (atheist? agnostic? deist?) shares so who gets to establish the standard of good and who gets to change it and when and why?
LOL! God's standards of goodness supersede the moral climate of any generation. He doesn't change. He is never passé.
Try reading the scriptures, and discover for yourself how man is so loved by God, and even considered worth saving---all while we are behaving in the most evil ways.
I doubt very much that you will be able to support this assertion. What I suggest you will indeed be able to show is that many who call themselves "Christians" promote ideas that are indeed myopic. But this is a slightly different matter. Perhaps you will say I am engaging the "no true Scotsman" argument. Well, if you want to go that route, I am happy to deal with that.Myopic? Christianity is founded on myopia.
I doubt very much that you will be able to support this assertion. What I suggest you will indeed be able to show is that many who call themselves "Christians" promote ideas that are indeed myopic. But this is a slightly different matter. Perhaps you will say I am engaging the "no true Scotsman" argument. Well, if you want to go that route, I am happy to deal with that.
I disagree. We learned long ago that slavery is immoral. We learned long ago that ordering soldiers to kill non-combatants [women and children/babies] is excessively immoral. We learned long ago that, even IF it is some weird "test", human sacrifice should never be suggested. Unless "human life" is worthless. . .
We are precious in God's sight. If we weren't valuable to God, He would never have sent His Son to die for us. Get a clue.. . . as is seen many times in scripture. If humanity was "considered worth saving", I just don't see it. Having read the scriptures, there is FAR more unnecessary death than there should be, even death to those who were NOT "most evil in their ways".
The old saying, "learn history or repeat it" says a lot. We learn from our mistakes. What didn't work in the past is learned and a new path taken.
why is it that non-christians seem to have this naivity with men that men simply arent evil.
i wish i had some pics of the mass graves of babies and kids that i saw all slaughered by the soviets in the thousands.
or mention that when russia left afghanistan they poisoned wells for the civilians and also turned afghanistan into a desert.
It isn't so much naiveté, as it is godless self centeredness. The world of the unbeliever isn't big enough for the one true God. To them we are good, and improving all the time. They do not see the devolvement of man, or they would have to reject evolution. True spiritual myopia.
Humans aren't devolving.
Yes, they are in many ways, and will continue until Jesus comes back and sets up His government and shows us just how it is supposed to be.