Well it is written in plain words, your issue is with Gods Word not with me.
I asked you before to show me where these plain words are that say all sin the result of legalism.
I showed you an example of where sin had nothing to do with legalism but you insisted on reading it into the passage. Your opportunity for opinion is allowed and respected, but we need scripture, not opinions, in order for you to impress what you say forcibly on us through the "wisdom of scripture" you suggest you possess.
Just sticking to the topic here. Just show us where it says all sin is the result of legalism, and that sin can never be the result of just plain old love of sin and unrighteousness.
Well you twist my words, do you think that is honest? I have said only what the scriptures say in clear and evident terms "the strength of sin is the law" "for sin shall not have dominion over you because you are not under law" "the law is not of faith" Those who seek to be justified by the law, have fallen from grace and are cutoff from Christ. So what point would you like to start in this discussion?
How is it that all sin is a desire to be justified by the law?
The power of sin being the law does not mean all sin is because of the law. In that very passage, if I'm not mistaken, Paul says, "nevertheless, sin was in the world
before the law." The passage is about how law magnifies sin, the sin already present in man by virtue of his adamic nature, and ensures his condemnation as a sinner, not makes a man righteous as the Jews mistakenly understood the law to do.
Relating this back to OSAS, you plainly say above that the person who seeks justification by the law has "fallen from grace and are cutoff from Christ". That's NON-OSAS whether you want to acknowledge it, or not. So in your doctrine 'faith in doubt' is how a person is saved? You, also have a doctrine that 'unsaves' people, too, then, right?