It described God Returning to his place, that only ever happens at the ascension, Period.
Hosea and Ezekiel would beg to differ with you on that, as I have shown from both.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
It described God Returning to his place, that only ever happens at the ascension, Period.
What is your Opinion on this? Does scripture state anything concerning this or not? Why or Why not?
Just looking for answers.....:eeeekkk
I am Of the opinion that their is a Pre-Trib Rapture, but would like to hear others opinions and facts....
Good for you because when I was growing up it was a lot sooner than it is now.I have never worried about the timing of the rapture, not even once. I'm covered. That's good enough for me. Pre, mid, post, whenever. I am His. He is mine.
I have never worried about the timing of the rapture, not even once. I'm covered. That's good enough for me. Pre, mid, post, whenever. I am His. He is mine.
Any one have a Bible verse or passage that talks about a 7 year Great Tribulation?
So John says hereafter and that naturally refers to Dan's prophecy and somehow proves that a multi-millennial GAP exist between week 69-70?Dear Sister reba, I am entering into this thread subsequent to all that has been discussed without reading it all, and if I am just rehashing old news please just delete this reply.
In Revelation 1:1 we read: "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass . . ." These things will Come to pass from when?
Revelation 1:10 "I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day . . ." What is the Lord's day? Read all you can of the "Day of the Lord" and we read in 1 Thessalonians 5:2 "For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night."
Another is "In that day." Zechariah 14:9 And the LORD shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one LORD, and his name one.
How do we come up with seven years of tribulation? Daniel 9:27 "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate."
What makes this week of Daniel seven years? Ezekiel 4:6 . . . I have appointed thee each day for a year, but just when is this viewpoint in scripture?
From that future Lord's day John is told in Revelation 1:9, "Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter." John does describe a backwards look at things past, and things which are now from that future time, but now let's look at things hereafter. Revelation 4:1 "Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter."
I'll leave it at this for the time being lest I head into too many directions at once.
Good morning Hitch. I do not adhere to the thought of a seventieth week of Daniel as I believe that four hundred and ninety years continued right on after the time God raised Jesus up in Acts 2:32, and all that believed had all things common according to Acts 2:44 which lasted up to the stoning of Stephen, and the conversion of Paul.So John says hereafter and that naturally refers to Dan's prophecy and somehow proves that a multi-millennial GAP exist between week 69-70?
Well thats no more bizzar than most other contortions futurism requires.
How do we come up with seven years of tribulation? Daniel 9:27 "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate."
How do we come up with seven years of tribulation?
Good morning Hitch. I do not adhere to the thought of a seventieth week of Daniel as I believe that four hundred and ninety years continued right on after the time God raised Jesus up in Acts 2:32, and all that believed had all things common according to Acts 2:44 which lasted up to the stoning of Stephen, and the conversion of Paul.
I understand that you are Preterist and so will not address that except to say I believe there is a separation between Daniel 9:26 and Daniel 9:27; verse twenty-six being those events of AD 70. If we must have a tag to identify that time I would go along with something such as "Another week, or a last week" of Daniel. Jacob's trouble of Jeremiah 30:7, and as Daniel 12:1 describes a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time. In other words, if you Jews, and that is what Daniel was interested in, think you've been through the wringer, you ain't see nothing yet.
Hi Reba. I'll now attempt to put together some measure of days. Below we read of 1290 days until the abomination is set up, and just what is that?Eugene To my way of thinking your line here makes my point.. Man has come up with '7 years of tribulation' there is no passage that speaks of it...
Note: i am not saying there is not tribulation...
I cant tell whether you are undecided or terribly unclear.Good morning Hitch. I do not adhere to the thought of a seventieth week of Daniel as I believe that four hundred and ninety years continued right on after the time God raised Jesus up in Acts 2:32, and all that believed had all things common according to Acts 2:44 which lasted up to the stoning of Stephen, and the conversion of Paul.
I understand that you are Preterist and so will not address that except to say I believe there is a separation between Daniel 9:26 and Daniel 9:27; verse twenty-six being those events of AD 70. If we must have a tag to identify that time I would go along with something such as "Another week, or a last week" of Daniel. Jacob's trouble of Jeremiah 30:7, and as Daniel 12:1 describes a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time. In other words, if you Jews, and that is what Daniel was interested in, think you've been through the wringer, you ain't see nothing yet.
Greetings Sinthesis. I'll attempt to show why I do not believe this to be the case here.Daniel 9:26 and Dan 9:27 are describing the same events, but from different angles as a form of emphasis.
What 62 weeks are we speaking of in which Messiah shall be cut off? Is this not Jesus' death?Daniel 9:26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
The "He" here that makes a covenant many for one week (7 years) is not Jesus, it is the man of sin, a representative of Satan; that same power that destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. Jesus does not make or break a covenant with any for a week.Daniel 9:27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
You cant be serious; You dont believe Jesus made a covenant?Greetings Sinthesis. I'll attempt to show why I do not believe this to be the case here.
What 62 weeks are we speaking of in which Messiah shall be cut off? Is this not Jesus' death?
The "He" here that makes a covenant many for one week (7 years) is not Jesus, it is the man of sin, a representative of Satan; that same power that destroyed Jerusalem in 70 AD. Jesus does not make or break a covenant with any for a week.
My thoughts.
Good morning Hitch. I do not adhere to the thought of a seventieth week of Daniel as I believe that four hundred and ninety years continued right on after the time God raised Jesus up in Acts 2:32, and all that believed had all things common according to Acts 2:44 which lasted up to the stoning of Stephen, and the conversion of Paul.
I understand that you are Preterist and so will not address that except to say I believe there is a separation between Daniel 9:26 and Daniel 9:27; verse twenty-six being those events of AD 70. If we must have a tag to identify that time I would go along with something such as "Another week, or a last week" of Daniel. Jacob's trouble of Jeremiah 30:7, and as Daniel 12:1describes a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time. In other words, if you Jews, and that is what Daniel was interested in, think you've been through the wringer, you ain't see nothing yet.
Hitch, I'll repeat what I previously wrote above that is now highlighted: "I believe there is a separation between Daniel 9:26 and Daniel 9:27." I'll add that I believe it continues throughout the times of the Gentiles and their fullness of Romans 11:25.I cant tell whether you are undecided or terribly unclear.
What do you suppose is the reason that some future generation will suffer such horrors?Hitch, I'll repeat what I previously wrote above that is now highlighted: "I believe there is a separation between Daniel 9:26 and Daniel 9:27." I'll add that I believe it continues throughout the times of the Gentiles and their fullness of Romans 11:25.
I certainly do not believe this world has faced Matthew 24:21, "For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be." Nor have we seen Matthew 24:22, "And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened."
Jesus made covenants, but not the one of Daniel 9:27 broken in the middle of the week. Do you have such evidence?You cant be serious; You dont believe Jesus made a covenant?