V
Vanguard
Guest
I believe that the serpent (satan) first dèceived Eve in the garden. Jesus said he was the deceiver from the beginning. If Judism doesn't embrace this, perhaps they have been deceived. He is the father of lies and in that way, bringing false accustiòns agaist us, Yes he is also the accusar. Isn't that the meaning of the word devil?
It is a bit more complicated than that.
Satan (from the Hebrew Ha-SaTan) means "the accuser" and to a lesser extent "the adversary." There is no mention in the OT that refers to Satan as the deceiver. Hebrews [Jews] do not believe in the concept of Satan as the devil, and the OT is their history and genealogy. Why would they write about something they don't believe in? They wouldn't.
Most of the NT references to Satan being the deceiver, the serpent, the dragon, etc. come from the Book of Revelation, in the NT.
Before we go any further, we need to take a timeout and go over something. With regard to the Book of Revelation, what is your belief:
1. Idealist- Revelation is allegorical and not tied to any specific historical events (belief founded by the church father Origen, supported by Augustine). The events in Revelation are symbolic.
2. Preterist- the events have already happened, either in the 1st century AD, or just after the collapse of the Roman Empire. We're living in a post-apocalyptic age.
3. Historicist- the events happen over the course of time, starting with the Apostles through the modern age, and are tied to specific historic events (with or without proof), and some have yet to happen.
4. Futurist- the literal approach to the Book of Revelation (for those that take the Bible literally at its word). Those events have yet to happen, but will happen at some point in the future.
If you are anything other than a futurist, there is some wiggle room for applying the deceiver, dragon, and serpent to Satan. However, if you are a futurist and take the Bible literally, then Satan (as the dragon) has yet to be cast out of Heaven during his war, in which Michael the Archangel defeats him and throws him down to the earth (not Hell), along with his fallen angels [demons].
If you claim that you are not a futurist, then you don't take the Bible literally at its word, and understand that the Bible is subject to interpretation.
This is Christian Eschatology 101.
Christians often tie the serpent in Genesis to the serpent in Revelation. The problem is that in Genesis, the serpent had wings/legs, and after the apple incident, God changed the serpent and made it crawl on its belly (it does not say snake, but we interpret it that way) and eat dust (angels don't eat). Since Satan is a created being; an angel serving God in heaven during Genesis, he can't be the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Remember...Satan does not get cast out of Heaven until the Book of Revelation, which, based on any position in Christian Eschatology, had not happened during the time of Genesis (or any other book).
Don't fall into the fallacy of using Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc.
Note: this is not my personal position, but rather, relevant information to the thread, as the title implies. However, the more I learn and study the more I am inclined to agree with the Jewish account of the OT. I haven't made that leap yet, but it is hard to overlook. As I have stated elsewhere, I could never be an Orthodox Jew, but Messianic is a possibility (they hold true to the Hebrew OT beliefs but also believe that Jesus is the Messiah).
As to the definition of the word devil, it comes from the Greek word diabolos, and it does mean accuser or slanderer.
Here's the kicker...
1. God is the only god, who is all powerful.
2. To give Satan power to operate independently of God, makes him a god as well, which contradicts #1.
Thus why Judaism does not believe in Ha-SaTan as anything other than an angel, with his name actually being a title (Ha = The, SaTan = Accuser), and he is following God's orders to accuse people of their sins, and bring them before God for judgment.
Sorry if any of this is confusing (I know it can be) but that is Theology 101.
Last edited by a moderator: