Dorothy Mae
Member
Jesus called Daniel “a prophet” and since he knew all the events you speak of, his evaluation is superior to yours or the men you quote. If Jesus says Daniel wrote of future events, then we can trust he did. Sorry but Jesus is superior in knowledge.Edward If you think that Daniel supports your dispensational assertions, then don't just say "look at Daniel" and "7, 8, and 9". Quote specific verses and expound upon them, showing how they support your assertions, and then defend your view. That seems reasonable, right?
Daniel is a second-century forgery that claims to prophecy certain events that we can trace directly in history. 7:4 represents Babylon. 7:5 the Medo-Persians. 7:6 Alexander the Great. 7:7 possibly the Roman empire. 7:8 to Antiochus IV Epiphanes.
8:3 is the Medo-Persian empire, and the longer horn being Persia. The male goat is Alexander. 8:8 is the division of Alexander's kingdom into four parts., once again, 8:9-10 is Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Chapter 9 speaks of the exile. 9:2's "seventy years" extends from 605 B.C. to either 538 B.C. (first return of the exiles) or 515 (rebuilding of the temple completion). The seventy weeks extends from 605 B.C. to 164 B.C., with Judas Maccabeus cleansing the temple and the death of Antiochus. 9:26-27 is not a reference to Jesus but rather to Antiochus.
Chapter 11 is remarkable, so detailed that it must have been written after the fact. To quote it:
I'll need to expound on the rest later (no time right now), but my point is that Daniel refers to events long past, and does not support a dispensational view.
- 11:2 - fourth king is Xerxes, invaded Greece but defeated at the battle of Salamis
- 11:3 - mighty king is Alexander
- 11:4 - division of Alexander's kingdom
- 11:5 - king of the south is Ptolemy I Soter. North is Seleucus I Nicator. One of the other generals is Antigonus I Monophthalmus. Seleucus fled to Ptolemy and became his servant "one of his princes", but Antigonus was defeated, and Seleucus took power, winning over Ptolemy
- 11:6 - marriage alliance between Ptolemy II Philadelphus and Antiochus II Theos with the girl Berenice. As supposedly prophesied, Antiochus II and Berenice died (of poison).
Better add “but I respect you and understand your position.” I should make that a “permanent footnote.”
Last edited: