If it looks that way to you, that’s on you. Just because you missed the fact that I was addressing only the phrase "
fall from Grace" not the whole letter is not a good reason to think I’ve misapplied Paul’s other words in the letter. I was merely pointing out that the phrase cannot logically be applied to his acquaintance's situation. Yet he does.
I don't understand your question. Frankly, I couldn't care less about the "OSAS doctrine" or its exceptions which is probably why I'm not sure what you mean. However, I do care that I use the phrase "
fall from Grace" properly and in accordance to how Paul used it. When debating reasons someone might lose their salvation I don't see how Gal 5 is applicable. However, if you ever run across a Christian that desires to circumcise himself, then bring up Gal 5 to him. Maybe it will help him not sever himself.
It still looks to me as if your examples have no desire whatsoever to be circumcised. Right? Which is why I asked you if they did first. Like dominos falling, if the reason your examples have become un-saved in your view is that they got circumcised and started killing bulls, etc. then you might be able to apply “
feel from Grace” to their situation. Otherwise, it's n/a.
So I asked if that was the case, first. Then since you answered no, it started the dominos on their way to the logical conclusion that, that passage really doesn’t apply to them then. See how this works? I doubt it.
It doesn't say they lost their salvation or were about to. Simply that they were about to sever themselves, umm cut themselves. Frankly, I don't know what God will do to those that "
fell from Grace" there, if any did. The reason I posted the 1 Cor 4 passage is I think Paul is saying that sins (recognized ones or unrecognized ones that even Paul might have) are Jesus' business to deal with as He chooses when He judges people's hearts. Thus, if these "
fallen from Grace", severed and circumcised God believers still loved God in their hearts, yet got circumcised anyway out of ignorance, I cannot imagine God would administer Wrath to them, but maybe??? That's His business.
No, I don't agree with that. So thanks for asking if it was correct. I would agree if Paul would have said they were going to or did lose their salvation if they got circumcised, etc. He doesn't say it though. I thought your argument for OSAS was based on people that rejected God outright, not people that still loved God.
But I do know that Gal 5 has little to nothing to do with people that hate God (after their salvation) as these people loved God (and Christ, BTW). They were merely confused about circumcision as they had people telling them a bunch of bull.
If these God lovers attempted circumcision (severe themselves from Christ, pardon the pun), I don't know what God would do with them in the end.
okay, I'm glad you mentioned that. Maybe you can see all the more how the Gal 5 "
falling from Grace" by circumcision phrase is NOT applicable to them, then. The Galatians were being taught to do precisely the opposite thing. They were being taught by some to continue to obey God's laws of circumcision, not hate God's laws. It’s 180 off from your example. That’s my point!
That’s not staying on topic, that’s simply stating your opinion. You are the one that brings Rev 3's
vomit you out, up in these OSAS threads very, very often. For the same reason "
fall from Grace" is not applicable to your examples, that phrase is not either. Their message in which we find the phrase "
vomit you out of my mouth" is about Christians that still loved Christ only that they thought their wealth was self-derived. And Jesus gives them a rebuke for it by issuing advice to them:
advise, nakedness, blindness ,love, reprove, discipline and repentance. are all in context
You bring in anti-salvation into Rev 3's context just like you do God rejecters into Gal 5's context. I agree the phrase “
vomit you out of my mouth” is off topic to the discussion of losing one’s salvation. So If you don’t bring it up again, I will not.
The rest of your logic is about as good as this statement.
Brother, when you post something on a public Forum, it’s no secret.