farouk
Member
- Nov 17, 2010
- 17,217
- 220
Is he asking for H2o or The Living Water?
:shocked! OH NO! More questions and here I am almost unable to resist the urge to try to answer even it if makes me out to be a fool. Pardon me for this as I turn my Moderator trained and argumentative mind toward this conundrum. It is wiser for me to keep my mouth shut and to be thought a fool, than to open it and prove myself to one and all... that being said, I begin.
So now then, we have a case where somebody alleges that they know what happens when we leave our bodies. That being the case, we may wonder about an apparent fallacy, that specifically known as the fallacy of begging the question. This happens when the answer is presumed in the initial question. The question that is being begged is this: "What body are they in, if they are no longer in their physical bodied." This leads to a can of worms in the minds of some.
Does Jesus know this? He never used my words but said something that may indicate that he did. Paraphrase again (pardon the birdbrain who speaks): I do not come to give peace to this world but to set it aflame. Wait, that's not what He said, that is quoted better as, ""I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword", and others have noticed and called this part of the Lesser Commission. It is of the controversial statements reported of Jesus in the Bible by the Holy Spirit.
There are some who may understand this to be more than a parable. That's fair and I do not argue that point. It is the Word of God, spoken through the Logos of God, as reported by those Sent of God (apostles are they called). But still and within my unquiet mind, the part of me that seeks to be inhabited by the Peace of Christ, the part that seeks the Mind of Christ in me and in the hearts of others, and by seeking, I state implicitly that I do not yet have, that part continues:
If this is a true an very literal explanation of heaven, does this mean, or may I conclude that this means that when I am in heaven, I will be treated to a glimpse of those whom I love as they are in Hell? I notice also that Jesus did not accuse the Rich man of any specific sin. It is different than the explicit insight of the prayer of the Pharisee who was compared to the man who would not lift eyes to heaven, choosing instead to beat his breast and confess, "I am not worthy."
Also, the poor man mentioned (Lazarus) is not proclaimed a righteous man. We are given a glimpse of an undesirable outcome and asked to look at what is seen as the Judgment of God and apply it to ourselves. If I were to take liberties with the world of Jesus and to extend them beyond the normal boundaries of conversation to the implications thereof, I could foolishly conclude that all the homeless (by the sake of their poverty) are bound for heaven. Now we do know that God is indeed concerned for the widow and the orphan and the poor, but we also know that this concern is not to be taken as an argument for a modified "universal salvation" position based on the lack gianormous size of our bank accounts.
Okay, enough from me. I've said too much.
Ahem, now that you have said too much, I must say that if I can get through all that you have just said, I will probably be in agreement with you.
Sparrowhawke's posts are often very deep, anyway, so it's often not a work of a moment to figure whether we each of us agree or not, or whether in fact he has actually successfully convinced us.