- Jul 13, 2012
- 38,557
- 8,087
[My comments in brackets are my way of slightly modifying your point to describe a reasonable test for other options that have been presented as follows:]
blood = Mary's hymen blood???
Is Mary's hymen blood a witness which can be a testimony either accepted or denied? For a Christian it is accepted, for a non-Christian it is denied. pass/fail? Pass. Fair enough. However, John did NOT witness it, yet his Epistle says he is writing about things he's touched and heard and has seen (1 John 1:1-4). So Biblically speaking it's a fail if one accepts what John is writing about in this Epistle.
water = Is Mary's birth water sack a witness which can be a testimony either accepted or denied? For a Christian it is accepted, for a non-Christian it is ACCEPTED. Pass/Fail? Fail. How is natural child birth a "witness" that Jesus is the Messiah to a non-Christian? It's not.
It also fails the tests since John didn't see or touch Mary's water sack.
...
one could consider each of the various options in this way and come to their own conclusions.
This is He who came by water and blood--Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who bears witness, because the Spirit is truth. 1 John 5:6
Water and Blood is the testimony, not just water but water and blood.
When her water broke, so did her hymen.
Both water and blood ran out of her, not just water, but water and blood.
Natural child birth with the water from her water sack AND the blood from her hymen.
That's the witness.
JLB