The Trinity

[for_his_glory]

heartwashed I will leave you with this. Now these are your views and theology, we have proven to you what scripture says, but you refute everything we are trying to teach you as you say you are not doctrinated by the Oneness movement, but yet you clearly teach from their teachings.

Now I have not given you any violations of the Terms of Service that you have broken many times in here by saying we are not Bereans and basically saying we have no understanding. You and so many come into these threads with a preconceived idea of what others have taught you without searching the full context of scripture for yourself as what we have given you.

You are right as we have no understanding of what we refute in what you have given, because it is not Biblical by any means. This is not the first thread ever started on the Trinity and if one goes and reads the Oneness Pentecostal teaching on the Trinity they will see you are giving only that of what they teach, whether you are a follower of that church or not.

I ask that you go back and read the Terms of Service, especially 1.1, 1.3, 1.4 1.5 and be slow to speak and slow to read and understand what others are replying to you. When one thinks they are right and other ones are wrong then this becomes a pride issue thinking you are above and superior to others in how you understand scripture. Remember, full context of scripture will always bring out its truth. Bits and pieces of scripture rarely can prove ones point of view as they make scripture line up with their beliefs.

 

[heartwashed]

I have never said that you have no understanding. (use the quote feature and post it if I did, where I did that).

I will only say that what I have preached to you is in fact biblical.

And I am not saying that you are not Bereans; but my encouragement to you is that you be Bereans and look up all my references and see if they don't say what I am saying that they say.

I don't know if the post that is labeled as "Inappropriate Content" was deleted; but for your sake I hope that it wasn't.

For you never gave any reason as to why you have deemed it "inappropriate".

 

[for_his_glory]

I have never said that you have no understanding. (use the quote feature and post it if I did, where I did that).

I will only say that what I have preached to you is in fact biblical.

And I am not saying that you are not Bereans; but my encouragement to you is that you be Bereans and look up all my references and see if they don't say what I am saying that they say.

I don't know if the post that is labeled as "Inappropriate Content" was deleted; but for your sake I hope that it wasn't.

For you never gave any reason as to why you have deemed it "inappropriate".

I gave you the reason as you can view it in your alerts as I did not want to make it public.

 

[heartwashed]

I gave you the reason as you can view it in your alerts as I did not want to make it public.

You have given no valid reason; not even in the alerts; except that you simply call it "this behaviour".

You do not say what is wrong with the behaviour.

Jhn 18:23, Jesus answered him, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil: but if well, why smitest thou me?

 

[for_his_glory]

You have given no valid reason; not even in the alerts; except that you simply call it "this behaviour".

You do not say what is wrong with the behaviour.

Jhn 18:23, Jesus answered him, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil: but if well, why smitest thou me?

I posted it in the PM you were sent and will not discuss it here.

 

[heartwashed]

I posted it in the PM you were sent and will not discuss it here.

For what reason?

Certainly not because you don't want to embarrass me.

You labeled my post as "inappropriate"...

If there is valid reasoning behind that, then I consider it a reason for shame.

 

[justbyfaith]

I think of this as being a good thread on the true Trinity. heartwashed has it right.

 

[justbyfaith]

This is a good thread.

 

[netchaplain]

This is a good thread.

Hi, and thanks for the encouraging compliment! God bless!!

 

[gordon777]

This is a perfect thread, to encourage/allow difference not only of opinion, but also of denomination/belief.

If it was so important to have trinity belief, the world would have a majority of trinitarians, but there is not, neither of baptists, nor of seventh day adventists, no catholics, no separate sect, that can only mean standing for that persons divided belief, instead of just being called Christians as in scripture, can ever be a forum that has any union to the Spirit of Christ.


Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

1 Corinthians 1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

Isaiah 58:4 Behold, ye fast for strife and debate, and to smite with the fist of wickedness: ye shall not fast as ye do this day, to make your voice to be heard on high.

 

[justbyfaith]

This is a perfect thread, to encourage/allow difference not only of opinion, but also of denomination/belief.

If it was so important to have trinity belief, the world would have a majority of trinitarians, but there is not, neither of baptists, nor of seventh day adventists, no catholics, no separate sect, that can only mean standing for that persons divided belief, instead of just being called Christians as in scripture, can ever be a forum that has any union to the Spirit of Christ.


Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

1 Corinthians 1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;
15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.
16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.
17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

Isaiah 58:4 Behold, ye fast for strife and debate, and to smite with the fist of wickedness: ye shall not fast as ye do this day, to make your voice to be heard on high.

Forum fruit.

What fruit is, or can be evidenced on forums ? Does people being for 12-15 years on forums, evidence fruit of the Spirit, or evidence that no fruit can be in places that show Christianity, as discussion value only ? How many people actually realize they do the very opposite to the fruit of the...

christianforums.net

 

[gordon777]

You people of the forum, owners/OPs, are seen, revealed, as only having divisional topics on purpose, they are not good, they are not only wrong, they mean everybody who runs the forum have no excuses why they represent Christianity in this way, and should be investigated into by some sort of web authority, if one existed. ( in a wicked world with satan as their god.)

 

[justbyfaith]

You people of the forum, owners/OPs, are seen, revealed, as only having divisional topics on purpose, they are not good, they are not only wrong, they mean everybody who runs the forum have no excuses why they represent Christianity in this way, and should be investigated into by some sort of web authority, if one existed. ( in a wicked world with satan as their god.)

There ought to be unity as concerning subjects like this.

1Co 1:10, Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

However, unfortunately, the following is the rule of thumb as concerning people receiving the truth on these subjects.

1Co 2:14, But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

 

[justbyfaith]

You people of the forum, owners/OPs, are seen, revealed, as only having divisional topics on purpose, they are not good, they are not only wrong, they mean everybody who runs the forum have no excuses why they represent Christianity in this way, and should be investigated into by some sort of web authority, if one existed. ( in a wicked world with satan as their god.)

Yes, such a web authority would be run by satan.

 

[justbyfaith]

This, also, is a good thread.

 

[Free]

This, also, is a good thread.

So you already said, on April 24.

 

[Free]

You people of the forum, owners/OPs, are seen, revealed, as only having divisional topics on purpose, they are not good, they are not only wrong, they mean everybody who runs the forum have no excuses why they represent Christianity in this way, and should be investigated into by some sort of web authority, if one existed. ( in a wicked world with satan as their god.)

Right. So, you would rather have us shut down topics where Christians disagree and so censor those with whom we disagree? That is actually a very anti-Christian, anti-biblical stance. Who would be the one to judge whose beliefs are the correct ones and whose aren’t? Christians are free to discuss their beliefs, whatever they are, and whether or not others agree.

No one is forcing you to post here.

 

[Free]

There ought to be unity as concerning subjects like this.

1Co 1:10, Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

However, unfortunately, the following is the rule of thumb as concerning people receiving the truth on these subjects.

1Co 2:14, But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Posts like this are not at all helpful and violate the ToS. Please don’t post such things again.

 

[for_his_glory]

You people of the forum, owners/OPs, are seen, revealed, as only having divisional topics on purpose, they are not good, they are not only wrong, they mean everybody who runs the forum have no excuses why they represent Christianity in this way, and should be investigated into by some sort of web authority, if one existed. ( in a wicked world with satan as their god.)

And the threads you have started are not divisional, please. I believe what Jesus taught brought much division among the Jews and I would think that is why the Pharisees called Jesus a blasphemer and being of His father the devil as they planned on a way to silence Him.

 

[justbyfaith]

Coexistent modalism...the true Trinity.

Here is how I define the Trinity. The Father is a Spirit without flesh inhabiting eternity (John 4:23-24, Isaiah 57:15). The Son is the same Spirit come in flesh (John 4:24, Ephesians 4:4, 1 John 4:1-3, 2 John 1:7). The Holy Ghost is the same Spirit as He is released from the physical body of...

christianforums.net