Apparently not.
1689 Baptist Faith Confession of Faith
By the decree of God, for the manifestation of His glory,
some men and angels are predestinated, or foreordained to eternal life through Jesus Christ,7 to the praise of His glorious grace;8
others being left to act in their sin to their just condemnation, to the praise of His glorious justice.9
7
1 Tim. 5:21;
Matt. 25:34
8
Eph. 1:5–6
9
Rom. 9:22–23;
Jude 4
I already stated that to those damned, whether it's positive-positive or positive-negative is irrelevant. In either case it's God that is choosing based on nothing but to the praise of His glorious name and to the praise of His glorious justice.
I mean, I'd love to see some scripture on the above.
I'd like to list the verses you have to support this theory, which is probably the list of verses quoted in the 1689.
You posted:
7
1 Tim. 5:21;
Matt. 25:34
8
Eph. 1:5–6
9
Rom. 9:22–23;
Jude 4
None of them really do.
It's a matter of how we want to read scripture and how it's exegeted.
1 TIMOTHY 5:21
20Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also will be fearful of sinning.
21I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of His chosen angels, to maintain these principles without bias, doing nothing in a spirit of partiality.
So many problems with the above...
1. Why should those continuing in sin be rebuked at all? Isn't God decreeing that they sin?
Both the Institutes and the WCF confirm that God decrees the action of every man.
Are you going to go by what the bible states or what Calvinism states?
There SHOULD BE no use for the Institutes or the WCF or the 1689, or any confession.
So since God decrees the action of each man, isn't each man just doing what God has decreed?
Paul says they should be fearful of sinning. Why?
Because, apparently, they will be under God's judgement,
so, in Calvinist theology, God condemns those he decrees to sin.
Is this just?
And yet God is a God of justice.
Deuteronomy 32:4 GOD IS JUST.
2. God's CHOSEN angels.
God CHOSE the angels that would fall?
This is not what scripture teaches. It teaches that some of the angels (1/3) rebelled against God, most probably due to pride, and were cast out of heaven to due their rebellion. The same reason persons are sent to hell - not because God arbitrarily sends them there.
Revelation 12:7-10 MICHAEL FIGHTS THE DRAGON. (satan).
3. Paul says not to take sides, but to throw out the sinners that won't stop sinning, or take them to task, and that God backs him up, and Jesus and the angels. If Paul is not to take sides and is backed up by Jesus and God...how much more will God be impartial?
Romans 2:11 GOD IS IMPARTIAL.
Deuteronomy 10:17 DITTO
MATTHEW 25:34
34“Then the King will say to those on His right, ‘Come, you who are blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.
What does the above say about God predestinating persons to heaven or hell?
It says the Kingdom was prepared from the beginning for those blessed by the Father.
Who is blessed?
According to Jesus we can read who in
Matthew 5, the Beatitudes
EPHISIANS 1:5-6
5He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will,
6to the praise of the glory of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved.
God predestined us to adoption....
It's always HOW or WHY,,,,
God's predestined plan (Genesis 3:15) was to allow us to be adopted a sons through Jesus , the offspring of the woman. THIS is the kind intention of His will, to save those that believe in the sacrifice of His Son.
Which is why the sacrifice makes perfect sense, in our choosing to believe in the Son, otherwise it makes no sense at all.
Jude 4
4For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.
The long beforehand is referring to persons that had been foretold from even in the OT.
The expression "before the beginning of time" was not used.