He was born from a virgin, not having an earthly father, specifically because the 'nature' to sin is passed through the male 'seed'. The woman was deceived, Adam chose to sin. Christ did not have the 'nature' to sin simply because He did not have an earthly(biological) father.
Rom 5:12-18
Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned—for sin indeed was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not counted where there is no law. Yet death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those whose sinning was not like the transgression of Adam, who was a type of the one who was to come.
But the free gift is not like the trespass. For if many died through one man’s trespass, much more have the grace of God and the free gift by the grace of that one man Jesus Christ abounded for many. And the free gift is not like the result of that one man’s sin. For the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation, but the free gift following many trespasses brought justification. For if, because of one man’s trespass, death reigned through that one man, much more will those who receive the abundance of grace and the free gift of righteousness reign in life through the one man Jesus Christ.
Therefore, as one trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men.
--But no verse teaches original sin much less original sin is passed though the father.
--A supposed proof text for original sin, Psa 51:5, only mentions the mother. If David was born a sinner then he must have gotten it thru his mother.
--if Christ was not born with sin/sin nature, then those verses that I cited would be false.
--man is not born with a sin nature Genesis 4:7
--I dealt with the context of Romans 5 back in post #13 of this thread:
2) Romans 5:14 "Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those who
had not sinned according to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come."
If all men inherit Adam's sin, then all would "fall" due to the exact same sin of Adam, but Paul here speaks of those that "fell" by sinning a sin different from Adam's. Therefore people are sinners not passively just by being born inheriting Adam's sin but are sinner for choosing to sin. In verse 12 Paul says " for that all have sinned" with "have sinned" showing personal culpability in the sinning.
3)
Romans 5:18a Therefore as by the offence of one
judgment came upon all men to condemnation;
Romans 5:18b even so by the righteousness of one
the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life."
If
Rom 5:18a proves
all men are unconditionally born sinners due to Adam, then it is also true that same
all men will unconditionally be justified due to Christ's righteousness and you are pushing Universalism.
Yet Paul did
NOT say 'all men' are
UNCONDITIONALLY made sinners no more than he said "all men" will
UNCONDITIONALLY be justified. Paul points out in
Romans 5:1-2 men are CONDITIONALLY made righteous/justified for having faith and in verse 12 men are CONDITIONALLY made sinners for choosing to sin. Paul's point in this context of
Romans 5:18,
19 is that all who have been effected by sin since sin entered the world thru Adam, Christ has a remedy for them brought about by His obedience in going to the cross. So not only can original sin NOT be found here, it also refutes the idea of limited atonement.
