Theodore A. Jones
Member
Folks, I'm going to bed, its been a long day---bless all!
Yeah somebody has finally something at least that I can agree with. That's a good idea, but I'm waiting for a phone call.
Find out how Christians are supposed to act in the following study
https://christianforums.net/threads/charismatic-bible-studies-1-peter-2-11-17.109823/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Folks, I'm going to bed, its been a long day---bless all!
Hope I did not offend you in my response, but I know that the "issue of the thieves" is a important one in the big picture of salvation and simple faith. I am glad to see that you are willing to yield to later scriptures in forming your understanding, many do not seem to have this ability. For many things where written in the latter letters to the Church, that clear up many things in the 4 gospels. Anyway I hope you rest well and God Bless-MitspaHi Mitspa
Did I not say it was a mute mute subject as to whether either or both thieves were baptized or not baptized? Did I not say no one knows whether the thief was baptized or not because someone had raised the question of baptism? What I have said which is fact, is that Jesus language of Mark 16:15-16 was not spoken until AFTER the thief on the cross had died. Now, is that fact or not? I say its a fact.
God bless
Neither thief was nailed to their crosses. Only Jesus was nailed to a cross as the prophets had predicted.
Born Again?
Is there an accepted understanding amongst protestant churches, of what Born Again means.
If not an accepted meaning of Born Again between all protestant, would people please share their understanding, and give what denominations belief they are sharing?
Actually, the term "Born Again" is only used in reference to the Jews. Paul never uses this term with the Gentiles. It was Jesus who first used it when speaking to Nicodemus, a Jew. The Jews understood that they were the heirs of the promises God made to Abraham by their physical birth. God had promised the Land to Abraham and his Seed. The Jews understood the word seed collectively as the offspring of Abraham. As such Nicodemus, being a Jew, understood that he was a part of the kingdom of God. However, Jesus informs Nicodemus that his physical birth is not sufficient for him to enter the kingdom of God. He tells him he must be born again.
And the Way to become born again? Discribe this proceedure as you see it and and your description not be an exception to any of God's law.
Actually, the term "Born Again" is only used in reference to the Jews. Paul never uses this term with the Gentiles. It was Jesus who first used it when speaking to Nicodemus, a Jew. The Jews understood that they were the heirs of the promises God made to Abraham by their physical birth. God had promised the Land to Abraham and his Seed. The Jews understood the word seed collectively as the offspring of Abraham. As such Nicodemus, being a Jew, understood that he was a part of the kingdom of God. However, Jesus informs Nicodemus that his physical birth is not sufficient for him to enter the kingdom of God. He tells him he must be born again.
I'm not sure your correct, I don't see "Jew" in John 3:3 anywhere, I do see "Except a man be born again", Unless there were no Gentiles at the time, this would include them too...
John 3:3 (KJV)
3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
It is a disobedience of the Acts 2:38 command whenever the attempt to obey that command is by repenting of sins. The Acts 2:38 command can only be obeyed by the faith of repenting of a sin not sins.
It's from the context. God had made promises to Abraham, one was that He would give the promised land to Abraham and his Seed. They were also given the covenants, promises, and God's Law. They were the kingdom of God. Jesus told the Jews that the kingdom of God would be taken from them an d given to a people bearing the fruit thereof.
KJV Matthew 21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.(Mat 21:43 KJV)
Jesus also said that He had only come to the Jews. We would expect his words to apply to the Jews. As I said, the Jews thought that they being the physical seed of Abraham were the heirs of the promises to Abraham. Jesus tells Nicodemus, that which is born of the flesh is flesh, in other words, your physical birth is not sufficient to enter the kingdom, you must be born again.
It was the Jews who were God's son.
KJV Exodus 4:22 And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn: (Exo 4:22 KJV)
Nicodemus being a Jew was a son of God through his physical birth. It is this birth that Jesus says is not sufficient, Nicodemus must be born again.
did he come down from the cross he was nailed to. what a off the wall question this is the 2nd post of this nature it makes no sense to go on and on. we are either born again , saved or converted . no in between no straddling the fence .. its a know so salvation, not a i think so i hope so . the Bible says we can know we have eternal life. at my home church we have a banner if your %99 saved your %100 lost:yes if folks would study the Bible they can know these things>
Born Again?
Is there an accepted understanding amongst protestant churches, of what Born Again means.
If not an accepted meaning of Born Again between all protestant, would people please share their understanding, and give what denominations belief they are sharing?
That is a big stretch there Butch, Jesus was not talking of only Jews, he was talking of all men.
Paul clears this up here when he says not all of Israel is of the seed of Abraham.
Romans 9:6-7 (KJV)
Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
Paul stressed the fact that not all of Abraham's children were Jews, that some were associated with Israel who were not really Israelites in the true sense, and that such a condition had extended back all the way to Abraham, Ishmael not being counted as Abraham's seed at all
Abraham had many children besides Isaac, their number running perhaps into the hundreds, since he had a plurality of concubines, besides Hagar; and after Sarah's death he was married to Keturah, thought by many to have already borne the sons attributed to her, during the period of her concubinage. From whatever source, the Bible states that 318 servants were born in his house. At the very least, all of the sons of Keturah and Hagar were among the "sons of Abraham" but were not so reckoned among the Jews, hence the validity of Paul's reasoning here to the effect that mere fleshly connection with Abraham did not make one an Israelite.
not sure of your translation? I think we have been ask to describe the translation we use if it is not the (KJV) Which reads much different!This is off the subject, but would like to comment on a statement of yours were it is promised eternal life/saved. Can you show using the Word of God where being saved/eternal life, means entering the kingdom of God? I will show you where it says one who sins will never enter the kingdom of God.
(1 Corinthians 6:9-19) “You know perfectly well that people who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God: people of immoral lives, idolaters, adulterers, catamites, sodomites, thieves, usurers, drunkards, slanders and swindlers will never inherit the kingdom of God.â€
Hi Butch5
Just a question, are we to conclude Peter's two letters didn't include gentiles? In I Pet.1:23 Peter says "being born again---"
God bless
Hi Butch5--
Thanks for your input. I'm aware of I Pet.1:1. However, if the letter does not include the gentile, and Peter uses the term "born again" in vs. 23, and Peter is discussing the siubject of conversion ("obeying the truth" which he identifies as the "word of the Lord" in vss. 22 & 25) where does that leave the gentile? I alwaiys thought we must obey the same truth, the same word.
God bless
when i get back from church tonight i will gladly answer your question. in the mean time please don't sin you might go to hellThis is off the subject, but would like to comment on a statement of yours were it is promised eternal life/saved. Can you show using the Word of God where being saved/eternal life, means entering the kingdom of God? I will show you where it says one who sins will never enter the kingdom of God.
(1 Corinthians 6:9-19) “You know perfectly well that people who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God: people of immoral lives, idolaters, adulterers, catamites, sodomites, thieves, usurers, drunkards, slanders and swindlers will never inherit the kingdom of God.”
Now to get back to the subject of the thread.
From the answers that I have received of the question what does Born Again mean, it seems that people truly have no understanding. People will quote scripture, but don’t seem to know what it means.
Can any one tell me what being born of the Spirit does to a person, and are there any manifestations that announce to the world that one is new born?
when i get back from church tonight i will gladly answer your question. in the mean time please don't sin you might go to hell
Some of you once lived this way. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit