- Dec 11, 2010
- 15,289
- 8,241
You mean salvation, right?Stuff happens even when you don't deserve it (actually, quite often when you don't deserve it)...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
You mean salvation, right?Stuff happens even when you don't deserve it (actually, quite often when you don't deserve it)...
The issue is, everyone who rejects "universalism" does not have to believe in limited atonement. I reject universalism, but I also reject limited atonement. There is a difference between 'limited' and 'available'. If its limited, then its not fully available. If its fully available, then its not limited.
I believe God's atonement is fully available to all. I believe His sovereignty gives Him the right(and power) to decide to let people choose Him or not. The reason I believe all of this is because it is all throughout the Bible.
Consider the people in Matthew 7:21-23.
Did Jesus atone for their sins on the cross?
Is that sin then being punished twice?
Jesus atoning blood must be limited by either application or efficacy, because all sins are not forgiven ... some go to hell.
Why do they go to hell when Jesus died for sin?
For which sins did Jesus die?
To which sins was the blood applied?
[I really wish it was after Easter. ]
I agree 100% ... and I am a 5 point Calvinist. (Does that tell you anything about the 'limitation' of the atonement in the 'Limited Atonement' of Calvinism?)"Why do they go to hell when Jesus died for sin?" - Because they reject His payment. They do not receive it.
"For which sins did Jesus die?" - For every sin, of every person, who accepts His payment. For all the sins of those who receive Christ.
"To which sins was the blood applied?" - Every sin that has been paid for by Christ. This does not include the people who reject God's payment.
... and I am a 5 point Calvinist. (Does that tell you anything about the 'limitation' of the atonement in the 'Limited Atonement' of Calvinism?)
Jim Parker
Re: Calvinism and Atonement: (from the Heidelberg Catechism of 1563)
Q. Does God permit such disobedience and rebellion to go unpunished?
A. Certainly not. God is terribly angry with the sin we are born with as well as the sins we personally commit. As a just judge,
God will punish them both now and in eternity,1 having declared: “Cursed is everyone who does not observe and obey
all the things written in the book of the law.”2
[1] Ex. 34:7; Ps. 5:4-6; Nah. 1:2; Rom. 1:18; Eph. 5:6; Heb. 9:27
[2] Gal. 3:10; Deut. 27:26
Q. But isn’t God also merciful?
The statement, "God’s justice demands that sin, committed against his supreme majesty, be punished with the supreme penalty— eternal punishment of body and soul." reveals more confusion.A. God is certainly merciful,1 but also just.2 God’s justice demands that sin, committed against his supreme majesty, be punished with the supreme penalty— eternal punishment of body and soul.3
[1] Ex. 34:6-7; Ps. 103:8-9
[2] Ex. 34:7; Deut. 7:9-11; Ps. 5:4-6; Heb. 10:30-31
[3] Matt. 25:35-46
Q. Are all people then saved through Christ just as they were lost through Adam?
This Q&A begs the question, “Saved from what?”A. No. Only those are saved who through true faith are grafted into Christ and accept all his benefits.1
[1] Matt. 7:14; John 3:16, 18, 36; Rom. 11:16-21
This is what Calvinism teaches on the subject.
The Q&A is based on the false assumption that “being saved” refers to being saved from God’s wrath. But the enemy of God is not the sinning man; it is death which, by His passion and resurrection Jesus destroyed. (1Cor 15:26; 51-57)Q. Are all people then saved through Christ just as they were lost through Adam?
A. No. Only those are saved who through true faith are grafted into Christ and accept all his benefits.
No, I was referring to all the stuff that happened to Job even though he was righteous.You mean salvation, right?
That passage clearly states that (1) everyone’s eternal station (eternal life or eternal 2nd death) will be based on their works and (2) those works are the result of each person’s personal choice. (SEEK immortality vs. OBEY unrighteousness)
Here's what Jesus said:I'm not sure you meant this like it reads; but this is very close to, and could be interpreted as - eternal life is earned by works of man, rather than a gift because of the work of God.
I was thinking along the lines of our unworthiness and how we don't deserve salvation or anything good for that matter.No, I was referring to all the stuff that happened to Job even though he was righteous.
iakov the fool
It's really disheartening to see two sides arguing for their position when both are wrong. If that sounds arrogant please know it's not meant that way. Christians have been so indoctrinated by theologians and don't even know it.
It's not about what we deserve; it's about whom we love and serve.I was thinking along the lines of our unworthiness and how we don't deserve salvation or anything good for that matter.
That was my point.Grace to you and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
It's not about what we deserve; it's about whom we love and serve.
It is God's will that every last human being be saved (2 Pete 3:9) and God has done everything necessary for that to happen. In God's love for all mankind, all that is necessary for everyone to have eternal life is to believe (which includes acting like he believes) and accept the gift.
Eternal life being a "free gift" doesn't mean we can just keep on doing whatever we were doing before being born again. We are told that a person is enslaved to whoever/whatever he he yields himself to obey.
Rom 6:16-23
Do you not know that if you yield yourselves to any one as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness? But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness. I am speaking in human terms, because of your natural limitations. For just as you once yielded your members to impurity and to greater and greater iniquity, so now yield your members to righteousness for sanctification.
When you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness. But then what return did you get from the things of which you are now ashamed? The end of those things is death. But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the return you get is sanctification and its end, eternal life. For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
We are not to allow ourselves to become enslaved again to the demands of the flesh which is sin. We are to imitate Christ.
Rom 13:13-14 let us conduct ourselves becomingly as in the day, not in reveling and drunkenness, not in debauchery and licentiousness, not in quarreling and jealousy. But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to gratify its desires.
Doing these things STILL doesn't mean we deserve eternal life because "we've been good." (As if God were Santa Clause rewarding good little boys and girls with lots of toys.)
But no one who is impure or defiled can be united to Christ as His bride. THEREFORE, in faith, we "press toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus." (Phl 3:14) knowing that "He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him." (Heb 11:6)
Eph 5:1-5
Therefore be imitators of God as dear children. And walk in love, as Christ also has loved us and given Himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling aroma.
But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints; neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.
Once a person is determined to follow Christ with all his heart, mind and strength, (Deut 6:5) then he is living within God's will and has begun the journey in which he is "predestined to be conformed to the image of God's Son." (Ro 8:28)
Rev 2:10b-11 Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life. ... He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death.
iakov the fool
(beaucoup dien cai dau)
DISCLAIMER: By reading the words posted above, you have made a free will choice to expose yourself to the rantings of iakov the fool. The poster assumes no responsibility for any temporary, permanent or otherwise annoying manifestations of cognitive dysfunction that, in any manner, may allegedly be related to the reader’s deliberate act by which he/she has knowingly allowed the above rantings to enter into his/her consciousness. No warrantee is expressed or implied. Individual mileage may vary. And, no, I don't want to hear about it. No sniveling! Enjoy the rest of your life here and the eternal one to come.
Yes! Those horrible theologian people who make it their life's work to study and expound the scriptures and upset all the dilettantes and dabblers who are much more capable than they because they "have the Holy Spirit" which, as everyone knows, no theologian could possible have.Christians have been so indoctrinated by theologians and don't even know it.
This thread was originally CREATED because people kept posting statements like yours in other discussions, but never really offering anything substantive to back up their bold positions. I wanted to hear what evidence existed for BOTH Arminianism and Calvinism being wrong, without crapping all over any other threads. So far, only one real taker who claims that neither properly addresses the issue of "Paul's thorn in the flesh, a messenger from Satan".It's really disheartening to see two sides arguing for their position when both are wrong. If that sounds arrogant please know it's not meant that way. Christians have been so indoctrinated by theologians and don't even know it.