Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
BobRyan said:Bubba said:Adam and Eve were the only people who had freewill in respect to spiritual decisions, after the “Fallâ€Â, mankind is sullied with a sin nature.
That is also true.
Apart from the supernatural "drawing of God" -- man is not able to make right choices after the fall -- as Adam and Eve were able to do before the fall.
But as we see in John 12:32 God solves that problem by supernaturally "drawing all".
And so all are enabled to make the choice that they could not of their ownselves make after the fall.
Because of Adam and Eve’s fall, death came into the world both spiritual and physical, thus Christ sacrifice on the cross has reconciled man back to God, both physically and spiritually. The Romans 5:18 “So then as through one trespass the judgment came unto all men to condemnation; even so through one act of righteousness the free gift came unto all men to justification of life.â€Â
True - but through the supernatural drawing of ALL by Christ - all are enabled to choose.
in Christ,
Bob
Catholic Crusader said:Adam and Eve were the only people who had freewill in respect to spiritual decisions, after the “Fallâ€Â, mankind is sullied with a sin nature.
Are you saying you don't have free will? Are you a Calvinist?
Come join us thenBubba said:Catholic Crusader said:Adam and Eve were the only people who had freewill in respect to spiritual decisions, after the “Fallâ€Â, mankind is sullied with a sin nature.
Are you saying you don't have free will? Are you a Calvinist?
CC,
I used to be, but I lost my religion and now simply believe in a God who really does love all people and is Sovereign nonetheless.
Peace, Bubba
Bubba said:The Scriptures nonetheless seem very clear that the natural man (1 Cor. 2:14-15) will never choose the things of the Spirit with out spiritual regeneration.
Bubba said:I guess the difference between you and I, is that you believe that once God has made you alive Spiritually, you can still say no to the offer of salvation through Jesus.
Bubba said:I on the other-hand believe that the heart has been changed as what happened to Paul on the road to Damascus.
Bubba said:In regards to grieving the Holy Spirit, this is our walk after enlightenment, in regards to those once enlightened and now have gone the way of apostasy, they never were true believers or they would still be a part of the Church (1 John 2:19).
Bubba said:Now, I used the word “dragged†because in the Greek that is a better translation for John 6:44 and actually should be used there.
Bubba said:Remember Joe, that since I believe in universal reconciliation, the harshness that is often associated with God’s total sovereignty in man’s life is ultimately in the long run brought to a love relationship with the Father (1Cor. 15:20-28).
Bubba said:Now Bubba says-The person before generation can not and will not accept the things of God. I am not associating a spiritual dead person with actual physical death, though physical death does come to all since Adam.
Bubba said:But when the righteous turneth away from his righteousness, and committeth iniquity, [and] doeth according to all the abominations that the wicked [man] doeth, shall he live? All his righteousness that he hath done shall not be mentioned: in his trespass that he hath trespassed, and in his sin that he hath sinned, in them shall he die. Ez 18:24
From David Steward:
“Taken by itself, out of context, Ezekiel 18:24 does appear to support the doctrine that a man can fall away from salvation. However, as you will see from other Scriptures in Ezekiel, this is NOT the case at all.
Ezekiel 33:12-13 states ...
"Therefore, thou son of man, say unto the children of thy people, The righteousness of the righteous shall not deliver him in the day of his transgression: as for the wickedness of the wicked, he shall not fall thereby in the day that he turneth from his wickedness;
Bubba said:Did you read that? ... "If he trust in his OWN righteousness." This is the heart of the matter here. God is simply condemning self-righteousness.
Bubba said:To claim that a person who commits sin can lose their salvation is to totally ignore such powerful Scriptures as Genesis 15:6 concerning Abraham, "And he (Abraham) believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness."
Bubba said:The Apostle Paul plainly stated in Romans 4:5, "But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness." These Scriptures clearly eliminate "works" as a necessity to one's eternal salvation. The damnable heresy that a believer can lose salvation is nothing less than a form of Lordship Salvation.
Bubba said:Whereas the Lordship Salvation crowd teaches that a person must forsake their sins to be saved; the eternal insecurity crowd teaches that committing sin will cause a person to lose salvation. Both heresies are based upon self-righteousness. Ephesians 2:8-9 is clear on the matter of salvation ... "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast." Again, carefully read Romans 4:5 ... "But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness."
Bubba said:Francisdesales in respect to Hebrews 10 as Hebrews 6, the audience in any given setting is made up of “wheat and taresâ€Â, the “tares†read into the text condemnation, the “wheat†security. Hebrew 6:9, “Even though we speak like this, dear friends, we are confident of better things in your caseâ€â€things that accompany salvation.†And Hebrews 10:39, “But we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who believe and are saved.â€Â
Bubba said:Bubba wrote:
Remember Joe, that since I believe in universal reconciliation, the harshness that is often associated with God’s total sovereignty in man’s life is ultimately in the long run brought to a love relationship with the Father (1Cor. 15:20-28).
Francisdesales wrote:
“I don't think substituting one error for another is correct.’
Is it an error? PM me if you want to discuss the possibilities. Bubba
Bubba said:To claim that a person who commits sin can lose their salvation is to totally ignore such powerful Scriptures as Genesis 15:6 concerning Abraham, "And he (Abraham) believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness."
Bubba said:[
Bob,
Thanks for your response, but I would say that John 12:32, is not about choice but about what Christ did on the cross. Which my slant would equate with universal salvation for mankind.
Bubba
Catholic Crusader said:Bubba said:To claim that a person who commits sin can lose their salvation is to totally ignore such powerful Scriptures as Genesis 15:6 concerning Abraham, "And he (Abraham) believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness."
The Catholic Church acknowledges what the text clearly says: "Abraham believed God and it was reckoned to him as righteousness," referencing Genesis 15:6.
There is more to this text, however, than you seem to know. While we agree that Abraham was justified by faith in Genesis 15:6 as Paul said, we also note that Abraham was justified at other times in his life as well, indicating justification to have another aspect to it. So there is a sense in which justification is a past action in the life of believers, but there is another sense in which justification is revealed to be a process as well, as I said before.
Abraham was depicted as having saving faith in God long before Genesis 15:6. Abraham had already responded to God’s call in Genesis 12 with what is revealed to be saving faith, years before his encounter with the Lord in Genesis 15. In addition, Abraham is revealed to have been justified again in Genesis 22, years after Genesis 15, when he offered his son Isaac in sacrifice in obedience to the Lord.
Genesis 12:14: Now the Lord said to Abraham, "Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you…" So Abram went, as the Lord had told him. Compare Hebrews 11:6,8: And without faith it is impossible to please God… By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called… and he went out, not knowing where he was to go.
Genesis 15:4,6: "This man [a slave] shall not be your heir; your own son shall be your heir." And [Abram] believed the Lord: and he reckoned it to him as righteousness. Compare Romans 4:3: For what does the scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness."
Genesis 22:15-17: And the angel of the Lord called to Abraham a second time from heaven, and said, "By myself I have sworn, says the Lord, because you have done this, and have not withheld your son, your only son, I will indeed bless you, and I will multiply your descendents as the stars of heaven… because you have obeyed my voice." Compare James 2:21-22,24: Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?… faith was completed by works… You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.
The Bible tells us Abraham had faith way back in Genesis 12. And according to Hebrews 11:6-8, this was not a natural faith analogous to the faith the demons have (see James 2:19), but rather a supernatural and saving faith given as a gift from God. If Abraham was not justified until Genesis 15:6, how could he already have saving faith in Genesis 12? In addition, if Abraham was justified once and for all in Genesis 15:6, why did he need to be justified again in Genesis 22 according to James 2:21? The reason is simple: According to these texts, justification is revealed in Scripture to be a process rather than a mere one-time event.
Bubba said:Ephesian 2:1-5
Bubba said:Romans 3:9-18
Bubba said:Romans 3:24-28
Bubba said:How would you interpret these Scriptures, if regeneration were not necessary before faith can be established?
Bubba said:Also, I have been giving a lot of thought on passages such as Hebrews 10 and Ezekiel 18, and I may have to concede that it appears that the text does talk of a falling away, though both passages have a refuge written in for the true elect or steadfast (Hebrews 10:39 and following chapters in Ezekiel like 36:22-28). Yet, for the sake of my new found belief that God will reconcile all people eventually to Himself in Christ, if a person falls from grace in this age, but in the next Hell is remedial and like the prodigal that person comes to his senses in the presence of Jesus and His angels in the Lake of Fire (not literal but a purification process in Rev. 14:11).
Bubba said:Mind you, 2/3 of the verses in the Book of the Revelation are from the Old Testament, and in some cases almost word for word in respect to judgments that were dished out and the literal flames and torment were not for ever and ever but “age enduring†for those inflicted. Many believe that The Revelation was speaking towards an imminent judgment possibly the fall of Jerusalem (early writing of book) or Rome’s eventual fall. Granted one would not want to come under judgment in this life (Hebrews 12) or the next, so it would behoove us all to examine ourselves to determine if we are truly in the faith. With all this rambling, I guess what I am trying to say, is that God will use revelation and the events of this age to bring us to a knowledge of His Son and also in the next, because He has Sovereignly willed to be the Savior of all people (1Timothy 4:10). Hopefully the cyber cops are sleeping. PM me if you address UR stuff in detail.
Blessings, Bubba
One of the underlying themes of Christianity is that we will be judged on our morality, our ethical compass. Throughout Scriptures, we see the theme of God punishing the wicked, those who refuse to turn to Him. Now, if God will totally ignore our direction in life and grant us heaven ANYWAYS, what exactly IS the point in persevering? While I can see a purging of someone who has a general direction towards God but is not quite that holy yet in the afterworld (what Catholics call "Purgatory"), I do not find the concept that the wicked, who DO NOT consider God AT ALL, to be "purged" later. All we see is death, an air of finality.
As to PM'ing, feel free to send me some Scriptures where you believe that the wicked will be saved in the end. I would be interested in hearing them.
Blessings,
Bubba said:One of the underlying themes of Christianity is that we will be judged on our morality, our ethical compass. Throughout Scriptures, we see the theme of God punishing the wicked, those who refuse to turn to Him. Now, if God will totally ignore our direction in life and grant us heaven ANYWAYS, what exactly IS the point in persevering? While I can see a purging of someone who has a general direction towards God but is not quite that holy yet in the afterworld (what Catholics call "Purgatory"), I do not find the concept that the wicked, who DO NOT consider God AT ALL, to be "purged" later. All we see is death, an air of finality.
As to PM'ing, feel free to send me some Scriptures where you believe that the wicked will be saved in the end. I would be interested in hearing them.
Blessings,
Remember Joe, I do not say that there is no Hell for those who remain in unbelief from this realm, I just do not believe it's eternal. How did the RCC come up with Purgatory? I sent a PM did you get it?
Bubba
francisdesales said:Bubba said:One of the underlying themes of Christianity is that we will be judged on our morality, our ethical compass. Throughout Scriptures, we see the theme of God punishing the wicked, those who refuse to turn to Him. Now, if God will totally ignore our direction in life and grant us heaven ANYWAYS, what exactly IS the point in persevering? While I can see a purging of someone who has a general direction towards God but is not quite that holy yet in the afterworld (what Catholics call "Purgatory"), I do not find the concept that the wicked, who DO NOT consider God AT ALL, to be "purged" later. All we see is death, an air of finality.
As to PM'ing, feel free to send me some Scriptures where you believe that the wicked will be saved in the end. I would be interested in hearing them.
Blessings,
Remember Joe, I do not say that there is no Hell for those who remain in unbelief from this realm, I just do not believe it's eternal. How did the RCC come up with Purgatory? I sent a PM did you get it?
Bubba
Bubba,
Yes, I got your PM. I am probably not going to be able to respond to it in the depth that I would like until tomorrow or Tuesday, so I ask you be patient with me. I'll have to do a bit of research. I agree with a lot of what you say regarding OT defintions of the afterlife, and would say that these beliefs held at the time were transitional and not complete. Only with Christ do we get more complete revelation.
I will look in particular at Origen and those who opposed his views regarding the eternity of the punishment of hell, since he advocated a limited punishment and the Church regarded this view as incorrect. I will have to look at the more specific reasoning from these men of 250 AD.
Take care,
Joe