Isa 22:21/22Where is that definition in the Bible?
Where is that definition in any literature... outside the RCC?
New one to me.
I thought the one who holds the keys can lock and unlock things... usually at the order of their boss.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Isa 22:21/22Where is that definition in the Bible?
Where is that definition in any literature... outside the RCC?
New one to me.
I thought the one who holds the keys can lock and unlock things... usually at the order of their boss.
I don't see any reference to prime minister here.Isa 22:21/22
whoops.. my bad.
I am very sorry... I got mixed up.
Please disregard my flub... too many conversations going on at the same time.
Where can one read the ToS?There are violations of the ToS. Any further violations will result in being banned from this thread.
Jesus Christ instituted the sacraments for the salvation of all men!The dispute appears to be in how that grace is received. By grace through faith in Christ as enabled by Gods Holy Spirit or enabled through sacraments. Paul preached Christ as the only mediator between God and man when Jesus was already in heaven. Why would he do so if its no longer held true as you state?
Links are under most forum headings.Where can one read the ToS?
Okay, thanks. If I have violated the ToS, I apologize.
Matt 17:24-27Still no Biblical references to backup your statements.
I still don't see you providing references.
That is all we ask.
Including references any time you are quoting a passage is just good form.Matt 17:24-27
I gave you this reference when I asked the question
Not applicable cos either satan was using Peter or Peter was acting on his own before they were endowed with power at PentecostRead my previous post #449.
acts 2:38:39 referring to ez 36:25-27
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
“This promise”
A promise from God is an oath and an oath is a sacrament
Why do you write something like "the sacraments are the fruit of the sacrifice of Christ, his grace and merits"? That is meaningless jabber.
The bread and wine were shared by Jesus with those who had dinner with Him. He said that they should remember Him when He was no longer with them (as should we). Nothing more.
Then why do people die eating without discerning His body and blood?
Jn 1:29 Jn 3:16 to name a fewInfant baptism is absurd. Confirmation is just a latter-day Bar Mitzvah. Confession should be said to others whom one has offended, not to priests. Marriage is not restricted to Catholics. "Anointing of the sick" is akin to practicing medicine. Holy orders is nonsense.
"Catholic Christians believe that the sacraments are channels for God's grace". This is unBiblical!
"The ark of salvation: one, holy, catholic, (universal) and apostolic church founded by Jesus Christ on Peter and the apostles" is unScriptural propaganda. Where (anywhere) in the Bible is the Catholic denomination mentioned?
Dogma Number 95 out of 255What is the meaning of "95"?
Sorry for this confusionSo being saved doesn't mean having eternal life? Is that what your priests tell you? If it doesn't, what is anyone saved from?
Never said the Bible is wrongThe Catholic priesthood is just a repeat of the OT priesthood: a priesthood separate from the rest of the population, given the responsibility of performing all kinds of rituals in the temple for the forgiveness of sins while collecting money from the population.
It is blasphemous to claim that you cannot be saved without a priest. John 3:16 -- perhaps the most famous verse in the entire Bible says “Indeed, God did not send the Son into the world to condemn the world but in order that the world might be saved through him." Absolutely no mention of a priest! Neither is there the mention of a priest in Ephesians 2:8-10: "For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God— not the result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are what he has made us, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we may walk in them." This directly contradicts the claim that "you cannot be saved without a priest!
Your denomination has created all kinds of myths that clearly contradict the word of God. It is not surprising in the slightest that you claim that your priests are right and the Bible is wrong!
We are not deciding importance based on writing scripture, if we did I guess the apostles who wrote no scripture would be meaninglessYou are nuts Peter is not given a greater role than anyone. Jesus interacted with everyone, and sometimes with Peter. But after Pentecost, Gal 2:8and thus the beginning of the Church, and Peter like the rest witnessed Christ and the new covenant in Him, up to the point where Peter and Paul wrote of each other as being important, and scripture in their writings, and as such Paul in Gal 2:8 even wrote of their God given evolving roles, where Peter was named as a Witness to the Jews, while Paul to the Gentiles.
And Christ Jesus did not Elevate Peter or his role, because when challenged, Jesus allowed Peter to pay a tax. That's it, you are saying Peter was elevated because he paid taxes?
Answer me this, if Peter was so important, then why did God allow Paul to write 13 known epistles to be canonized into our Bible, while Peter was allowed to write only two?
If Peter was so important, than why did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, write the four gospels and acts rather than Peter?
If Peter was so important, then why did God allow John to write a gospel, three epistles, and the Book Of Revelation?
If Peter Was So Important Than Why Did God Allow John To Write Revelation And Not Peter????