To experience the 2nd death one would have to still exist in some way from the 1st death. So could someone still exist in some way after the 2nd death?
Of course we have Scriptures that speak of our souls surviving the 1st death and even being resurrected bodily later. Not to mention the empirical evidence of Jesus’ resurrection. No problem, there.
As for what’s left after the ‘2nd death’, sure, theoretically it’s entirely possible that God could (and will) do whatever His Justice is for the resurrected Body/Soul combo if the lost in Hell. If the Bible taught Eternal Concise Torment (ECT) in Hell of the body, the soul or both, I’d have zero problem believing it. A Body/Soul
could survive a “2nd death” theoretically (like the first evidently will), if that is God’s will and His just punishment for the lost. But is it, is the question. And where’s it taught in Scripture, specifically? I cannot find it! And there’s lots of evidence against it such as:
1. Jesus’ message to us: Matthew 10:28 (ESV)
And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell.
Rather obviously Jesus is referencing God’s final judgment/punishment and even relating that to our ‘1st death’.
2. “Eternal Life” is a
gift ONLY to the saved; (
1 Tim 6:15-16, Gen 2:17, Prov 12:28, Rom 2:7, 2 Tim 1:10, 1 Cor 15, John 3:16, John 10:28, Rom 6:23)
The idea that human creatures somehow are in fact ‘destruction proof’ (even to God’s wrath), is unbiblical. I do fear Him that can destroy both soul and body in Hell.
3. What’s up with Jesus not being eternally, consciously tormented in Hell, if that’s the just penalty for the unsaved that He bore on mankind’s behalf?
I’m actually still open to the idea of ECT given any good Biblical evidence for it. It’s one of the reasons I even spend time here on CFNet. That is, evaluating the best evidence for ECT and against annihilationism. I said “I cannot find it (ECT taught Biblically)” and I’ve given it a fair chance for years to be found/taught (even in this Thread) because we have no Scripture that I’m aware of that speaks of any part of the lost (soul or physical or both) actually surviving after the 2nd death. Seems to me, that 2nd death is pretty much it for the lost, whatever the 2nd death is.
Revelation 21:6 (ESV) And he said to me, “It is done! I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. To the thirsty I will give from the spring of the water of life without payment.
But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.”
Saved get life. Unsaved get the second death. Plain and simple, really.
Of course the Bible does say (
speaking about John’s visions previous to the end of the story and the final punishment); that “
the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever" (Rev 14:11). So maybe I am oversimplifying this topic. MAYBE. So evaluating the best evidence against a 2nd death being, … well death similar in fashion to the 1st:
Take Rev 14:11, for example, which has been mentioned as one of the ‘best evidences’ (top three) against annihilationism. Technically, that’s probably true. It is among the ‘best evidences’ biblically speaking. Problem is, it’s not very good evidence at all, when you really study it. How it ever makes the top 100, much less the top three, is beyond me to understand. Except for there’s not even 25 passages to study that remotely resemble ECT, much less 100.
I find it odd (i.e. not very convincing) that one of the ‘best passages’ people point to does not refute annihilationism in the slightest since:
1) it specifically says it’s the “smoke” that ascends forever and ever (versus the actual lost living forever and ever).
2) that particular passage is not even speaking about the time frame of the final punishment/judgment in the first place (it’s about destruction/punishment on Earth prior to the Harvest of the Earth, not at or after the Final Judgment. It’s rather lazy exegesis to even mention it in the same conversation about post final judgment events. It’s not the proper timeframe to begin with.
3) it’s John’s vision being described and using his highly symbolic images within the vision itself (versus just straight outright Bible teaching like what’s in Matt 10:28)
4) we know what the Bible means when it uses the symbolism of “smoke rising forever” take Rev 19:1-3 for example since it’s right there in the same book/author, though many other similar passages could be used:
After this [the Fall of Babylon (i.e. the Great Prostitute) on Earth prior to the Final Judgment]
I heard what seemed to be the loud voice of a great multitude in heaven, crying out,
“Hallelujah!
Salvation and glory and power belong to our God,
2 for his judgments are true and just;
for he has judged the great prostitute
who corrupted the earth with her immorality,
and has avenged on her the blood of his servants.”
3 Once more they cried out,
“Hallelujah!
The smoke from her goes up forever and ever.”
Note what happened to the “her” in the vision of the future;
“So will Babylon the great city be thrown down with violence, and will be found no more”
Another passage that’s been mentioned as ‘best evidence’ for ECT is
Mark 9:42-48 because it says “
Their worm does not die” and “
the fire is not quenched”. Great. But again, if that’s the best evidence, it’s extremely lacking. Here’s why:
1. We’re not talking about worms “dying” we’re talking about actual people. So what if a worm does not die, even if you want to take this passage literally. But note how people stretch the fact that the text says “their worm does not die” into the “
_[lost]__does not die”. Either take it literally or metaphorically, but either way, it doesn’t say people do not die.
2. Why would, if Jesus meant to say the people do not die in Hell, doesn’t He just come right out say the lost do not die (either here or elsewhere), rather than even mentioning their worms? I know why:
a. Because He just got through saying “ 43 It is better for you to enter life crippled than with two hands to go to hell”. Jesus is clearly contrasting “life” (i.e. entering afterlife in heaven) with death. That’s what maggots do. They eat dead flesh and his hearers knew exactly what He meant.
b. Because He truly knows that the wages of sin is death (not being tormented by being eaten by maggots for eternity).
3. Life is better than death, which is his point of the whole passage (and creation for that matter).
4. Note it says to “
enter life”. What’s the only real alternative to “
enter life”? To
not enter life of course, not enter a painful life. “
It is better for you to enter life crippled than with two hands to go to hell”.
It’s consistent with His “Two Gates” teaching. One you “enter life”, the other you “go to Hell”. It’s not contrasting 1) you “enter life” and 2) the other you “enter an unpleasant life”. But that’s what people read into this text, for some reason.
Matthew 7:13-14 (ESV) “Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many.” For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.”
And His brother’s:
Jude 1:21 (ESV) keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life … save others by snatching them out of the fire.
What is “
the fire”? Jude says:
until the judgment of the great day— 7 just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.
To Jude, “punishment of eternal fire” = exampled by judgment on Sodom and Gomorrah (destruction) not eternal torment.
Note again how it’s the fire itself that’s eternal, not the punishment. It’s not eternal punishing, but rather eternal fire! i.e. God’s fire.