Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
True - in it's essence it is not but can easily become prideful in some - They glory in their obedience which is pride.unred typo said:Obedience is not prideful.
I'm not going to jump through hoops for you, AV ...i'm not out to impress anyone here. The gospel is simplistic and we are saved by grace given faith in God ...and this, not of ourselves. What are the characteristics of this new creature AV? I will answer that with scripture: "So if any one be in Christ, there is a new creation; the old things have passed away; behold all things have become new" 2 Cor. 5:17AVBunyan said:BTW Destiny - why not take the challenge of my OP which was the purpose of this thread anyway?
So here is the simple challenge:
1. How is the sinner justified before God? This can be covered in one or two sentences with as little as two or three verses.
2. Please name at least 5 miraculous works (there are at least 39) that God to the sinner at the point of salvation – for example: God redeemed the sinner – Eph. 1:7
I've never seen you present the above clearly. Maybe you have before you being on my ignore list I've missed it.
At any rate - go for it. I'm all ears.
AVBunyan said:True - in it's essence it is not but can easily become prideful in some - They glory in their obedience which is pride.
I take the below position:
1 Cor 1:31 That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.
Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
Phil 1:6 Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:
Gal 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
golfjack said:Atonement, I can show you many scriptures about spiritual death. For this debate, I simply asked God to help explain this verse, He witnessed to my spirit through the Holy Spirit the answer. If one really gives careful consideration to Hebrews 6:4-6, and Hebrews 10:26-30, You will see that is possible for one to lose salvation, but extremely difficult to do.
May God bless, Golfjack
This seems to be the most common of all commentaries. God will simply take the life of someone who is SO immersed in transgression, that is if they have transgressed against other humans and get incarcerated... and even at that, there is no reason for God to still not take them out of this world.Atonement said:Golfjack, you and I are not on the same page here at all and it's obvious, this is not about loosing salvation or free will.. As I have said in my post, that a Christian's life is cut short if they continue to live in sin. You are trying to turn this into a free will and a once saved always saved debate. I'm not going there with you. I'm talking about sin unto death, and you have a whole other theory in reference to the Scripture that was quoted.
vic C. said:This seems to be the most common of all commentaries. God will simply take the life of someone who is SO immersed in transgression, that is if they have transgressed against other humans and get incarcerated... and even at that, there is no reason for God to still not take them out of this world.
http://www.godrules.net/library/clarke/clarke1joh5.htmVerse 16. A sin which is not unto death] This is an extremely difficult passage, and has been variously interpreted. What is the sin not unto death, for which we should ask, and life shall be given to him that commits it? And what is the sin unto death, for which we should not pray? I shall note three of the chief opinions on this subject:- 1. It is supposed that there is here an allusion to a distinction in the Jewish law, where there was htyml hafj chattaah lemithah, "a sin unto death;" and htyml al hafj chattaah lo lemithah, "a sin not unto death;" that is, 1. A sin, or transgression, to which the law had assigned the punishment of death; such as idolatry, incest, blasphemy, breach of the Sabbath, and the like. And 2.
A sin not unto death, i.e. transgressions of ignorance, inadvertence, &c., and such is, in their own nature, appear to be comparatively light and trivial. That such distinctions did exist in the Jewish synagogue both Schoettgen and Carpzovius have proved.
2. By the sin not unto death, for which intercession might be made, and unto death, for which prayer might not be made, we are to understand transgressions of the civil law of a particular place, some of which must be punished with death, according to the statutes, the crime admitting of no pardon: others might be punished with death, but the magistrate had the power of commuting the punishments, i.e. of changing death into banishment, &c., for reasons that might appear to him satisfactory, or at the intercession of powerful friends. To intercede in the former case would be useless, because the law would not relax, therefore they need not pray for it; but intercession in the latter case might be prevalent, therefore they might pray; and if they did not, the person might suffer the punishment of death. This opinion, which has been advanced by Rosenmuller, intimates that men should feel for each other's distresses, and use their influence in behalf of the wretched, nor ever abandon the unfortunate but where the case is utterly hopeless.
3. The sin unto death means a case of transgression, particularly of grievous backsliding from the life and power of godliness, which God determines to punish with temporal death, while at the same time he extends mercy to the penitent soul. The disobedient prophet, 1 Kings xiii. 1-32, is, on this interpretation, a case in point: many others occur in the history of the Church, and of every religious community. The sin not unto death is any sin which God does not choose thus to punish. This view of the subject is that taken by the late Rev. J. Wesley, in a sermon entitled, A Call to Backsliders. - WORKS, vol ii. page 239.
I do not think the passage has any thing to do with what is termed the sin against the Holy Ghost; much less with the popish doctrine of purgatory; nor with sins committed before and after baptism, the former pardonable, the latter unpardonable, according to some of the fathers. Either of the last opinions (viz., 2 and 3) make a good sense; and the first (1) is not unlikely: the apostle may allude to some maxim or custom in the Jewish Church which is not now distinctly known. However, this we know, that any penitent may find mercy through Christ Jesus; for through him every kind of sin may be forgiven to man, except the sin against the Holy Ghost; which I have proved no man can now commit. See the note on Matt. xii. 31, 39.
Judy said:I believe that statement to be wrong. I believe OSAS and the last thing on my mind is 'what can I get away with today'. I think the only ones that think that are the one that don't believe OSAS. What I mean by that is, the ones that don't believe OSAS are the ones that says that is how we feel. And it is simply not true. If we thought that way we would really not be saved.