Solo said:
If one believes that the SALVATION that God GIVES to SINNERS can be GIVEN back, then such a one does not understand GOD'S SALVATION!
Also, such a one does not understand the walking in the Spirit and walking in the flesh and the ramifications of both. ! Corinthians is plain that a believers works will be divided into works of the flesh and works of the spirit; and those works of the flesh will be burned up, yet the believer will be saved.
I believe, if you look closely, that walking in the Spirit is a
mandate, because when one walks after the flesh they
backslide and the heart can become hardened (look at my new "backsliding thread" where I relate - in brief - my experience). It becomes a theological
necessity of great
importance then, when the Bible tells you (as a believer)
not to do something, to ask:
Why? What are the consequences if I do?. And not to make the pompous and nullifying stance of "
Well the true Christian couldn't do that".
Do the sins that you commit day in and day out keep you from being born again? Why or why not?
If being born again was a process, yes. But it is not. So rather if we can receive God's grace in vain, and set it aside ("
falling from grace" - no, not using this as falling from salvation proof, but rather as indication of not walking in God's grace as a Christian, which then could
lead, I believe, to loosing it if you continue unrepentant in it), then what grace then is there left to save us if we continually run from it? Where is repentance & acquital from sin outside of grace? You do know that saving is a constant action by God (to be consummated in the future), and that it also means "preserving", do you not?
According to Matthew 24:13, what is one to endure to the end in order to be saved? How is one to endure? Does one who endures until the end still sin? Why or why not?
Why does Paul in Ephesians after saying that salvation is a gift of grace, not of ourselves, and that God has created between the Jew and Gentile a
new man, abolishing the enmity between them, then proceed to strongly admonish them to
diligently preserve the unity of the Spirit
(Ephesians 4:3), lest (it seems) it deteriorate - causing the grieving of the Holy Spirit
(Ephesians 4:30), and why even after saying that God has
already unified them yet still tell them to strive for the
unity of the faith (Ephesians 4:13) [implying that the unity could be broken - which is why he warns against fights in the church] and why does he also admonish them to no longer be children (babes
in Christ - who are saved none-the-less) who could be suceptable to being tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine
(Ephesians 4:14)? What if a Church never grows to this maturity? Do you believe it is impossible for such people to be decieved? Surely not, for Paul warns constantly for the believer to avoid deception, and to not be caught in the snares of false prophets because it is
infact very possible, thus poses a
danger to the Christian. The Christian - Paul indicates - can be foolish, thus Paul admonishes them to not be foolish ("
So then do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is" -
Ephesians 5:17) and to rather grow in maturity (something
we have to do, though by God's power) because "
we are to grow up in all apects into Him"
(Ephesians 4:15).
Thus
we are told to mature, to not be foolish (thus allowing ourselves to be decieved and tossed to and fro - and what would be the consequences of never moving past that?), and to
preserve the unity that Christ originally put us in. Thus you see we can allow it to degenerate, thus grieving God, if we are not careful. What do you think the end consequences for a degerating, immature Church will be? Christ will surely remove their lampstand (Revelation 2:5) won't He?
God Bless,
~Josh