And was blinded for three days:
John 12:29-30, 34, 39-40, 42-43 (LEB) Now the crowd that stood there and heard it said it had thundered. Others were saying, “An angel has spoken to him!”
Ah, but some heard the voice and simply thought it was the voice of an angel. In my opinion, like Saul. But Saul had a destination to be healed and to be baptized with the Holy Spirit in the city.
Jesus answered and said, “This voice has not happened for my sake, but for your sake.
He's referring to those in the crowd that heard the voice, but thought it was an angel (Like Saul, in my opinion) as the others in the crowd didn't hear a voice at all, they heard a sound (like those traveling with Saul).
Then the crowd replied to him, “We have heard from the law that the Christ remains forever! And how do you say that the Son of Man must be lifted up? Who is this Son of Man?” For this reason they were not able to believe, because again Isaiah said,
“He has blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts, lest they see with their eyes and understand with their hearts and turn, and I heal them.”
Again, Saul was healed inside the city (not out). Your view has Jesus striking a converted genuine believer blind on the spot versus healing a blind unbeliever (though an unbeliever destined to be a believer) in the process of washing away his sins. Suffice it to say, I believe my view makes a lot more sense.
And the Bible clearly says Saul was healed and Saul's sins were washed away inside the city.
Acts 9:11, 18-21 (LEB) And the Lord said to him, “Get up, go to the street called ‘Straight’ and in the house of Judas look for a man named Saul from Tarsus. For behold, he is praying,
Acts 22:5, 11, 16 as indeed the high priest and the whole council of elders can testify about me, from whom also I received letters to the brothers in Damascus, and was traveling there to lead away those who were there also tied up to Jerusalem so that they could be punished. And as I could not see as a result of the brightness of that light, I arrived in Damascus led by the hand of those who were with me.
Maybe, maybe not. Or maybe Ananias knew what God was about to do with Saul. But notice how Saul had a letter to the "brothers" from the High Priests. It's inconclusive to base Saul's conversion on the use of the word "brother". It's not even clear that Ananias was of The Way. What's clear is that Ananias was still in good standing with those "brothers" in the city looking to arrest and punish those of The Way. So if he was of The Way (Christian), he did so relatively in the shadows (which is what I believe). But ask yourself this, since you agree that Saul's companions did not convert on the road. Who's house did they lead him to? Why would he be in the house of someone of The Way, if it were persecutors that led him to the city street and house???
And now why are you delaying? Get up, be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on his name!’
You're not going to convince me that Saul came into the city a washed man! Or one healed of blindness.
And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes and he regained his sight and got up and was baptized, and after taking food, he regained his strength.
And immediately he began proclaiming Jesus in the synagogues: “This one is the Son of God!” (see John 12)
According to Paul, Saul was occupied with it all the way into the city. After that, I don't know what happened to it. Maybe he gave it to the man in Damascus named Judas, IDK.
Acts 26:12 (NKJV) “While thus occupied, as I journeyed to Damascus with authority and commission from the chief priests, ...
I mentioned it because I was quoting the SoF belief in what constitutes a "genuine believer".
Close: Saul didn't know how to discern the voice being Jesus without the Holy Spirit's indwelling.
Paul is recounting the experience he had as Saul. No one can discern (and genuinely believe) the spiritual things (like the indwelling of the Holy Spirit) without the indwelling of the Holy Spirit for it is spiritually discerned.
Are you talking about water (H2O) baptism or baptism by the Holy Spirit of God. I haven't once mentioned water baptism. Obviously, water baptism is not required via the thief on the cross. But baptism by the Holy Spirit of God is required per this sites' SoF for genuine believers.
So the others were 'converted' on your view? Again, Saul never even said "Jesus" while on the road. It was Paul's testimony later (after he had discerned it) that the voice was Jesus'.
Jesus and the people of The Way. Per Paul's own testimony he went into the city occupied with the letter of persecution.
All your claims are not wrong. But two were. The two I pointed out Scripturally.
I believe I answered all your relevant questions.