Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
The Barbarian said:Comes down to evidence. We can still see it as it happening. Hard to deny something like that.
Its just like seeing the continental plates moving and assuming they all fit together which is hogwash IMHO.
The mountains in the video could have very well lifted up during or even after the flood fast, just because you see them rise slow today does not mean they always were that slow.
I seriously don't know the answer to this question: Does Cretaceous strata exist worldwide? Are any of the deposits land deposits, or purely water deposits?
The evidence shows that they do. Where do you think they don't?
Couldn't have happened during a worldwide flood, because the mountains are made of "flood deposits." So that's out.
Couldn't have happened afterward, because of observed folding. Rock can bend over time, but very, very slowly. If it happens to fast, the strata will shatter. And these aren't shattered. So that's out, too.
And since the Bible doesn't call for a worldwide flood, and since the evidence doesn't show that there was one, the conclusion is obvious.
The Barbarian said:And since the Bible doesn't call for a worldwide flood, and since the evidence doesn't show that there was one, the conclusion is obvious.
Have you read Genesis Chapter 7 lately?
I think John makes a good point here, that there are two worldviews at odd with each other and there is no way to resolve them.
If it was local why build a ark at all? why not walk to safety.
If it was local then the world escaped Gods judgment.
If it was local GOD BROKE HIS PROMISE NEVER TO FLOOD THE EARTH LIKE THAT AGAIN
Why don't people just walk to safety instead of die in floods? I'd think that is obvious. The flood was a rather unique case, where the Mediterranian broke into the present Black Sea basin, and rapidly flooded a huge area. The waters seem to have advanced a mile a day, which would have been a serious problem for anyone without a boat.
Well, it wasn't the world, but the land and people in the Middle East.
So far, He hasn't done it like that again. No floods on that scale.
Yep. The error is in assuming that the Hebrew word "eretz" translates to "the whole world." And it doesn't. For example, "eretz Israel" means" the land of Israel."
The Barbarian said:The same error we mentioned before. "Eretz" doesn't mean the whole world. Heaven is not above the Earth; that is a figurative statement.
As you see, Genesis does not support a worldwide flood.
Many people will say that it is because the mountain chain used to be flat ocean floor, but once again it is going to be a difference in oppinion.The top 3,000 feet of Mt. Everest (from 26,000-29,000 feet) is made up of sedimentary rock packed with seashells and other ocean-dwelling animals.