GodsGrace
CF Ambassador
Good for you.i was in carm i also joined different one once it lasted like dust in the wind. i spoke my peace left
I was banned.
It wasn't carm.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Good for you.i was in carm i also joined different one once it lasted like dust in the wind. i spoke my peace left
i been there done that lolI was banned.
Hmmm. Can't really remember.Where is "over there"?
they can be you challenge them very close and fire comes . i did a email correspondence with man from first forum.he had parkinson's .he pushed me hard in replies . i had dig deep to counter. he soon gave up trying to convert me over . actually it was respectfulThey were very aggressive and not very nice.
Maybe this is why it gets so nasty, like you said....they can be you challenge them very close and fire comes . i did a email correspondence with man from first forum.he had parkinson's .he pushed me hard in replies . i had dig deep to counter. he soon gave up trying to convert me over . actually it was respectful
Bingo if some not all dont agree ..its time to convert so they do . see personally i do believe in eternal security .but not like the southern baptist do . no body else believes like i do. i like being a lonerMaybe this is why it gets so nasty, like you said....
they try to convert persons.
I'm not here to convert anyone...only the Holy Spirit can do that.
I'm here to discuss because I enjoy theology.
Exchange some ideas....try to understand the other person.
Of course we each think we're right! That's a given.
No need to get all bent out of shape...we all love Jesus.
Well loner....Bingo if some not all dont agree ..its time to convert so they do . see personally i do believe in eternal security .but not like the southern baptist do . no body else believes like i do. i like being a loner
all ready thereSOTERIOLOGY
its not that far off lolMaybe someday you could tell me what you believe.
Was it a thread in a forum or a seperate forum? I'm interested in what they were saying, especially if it was upsetting. But, not that important I guess. Thanks for responding.Hmmm. Can't really remember.
I think the owner's name is William.
Not sure. I was only there about a week.
They were very aggressive and not very nice.
Sorry about that. Thought I had a quote in there. You said Calvinists thought God was a monster. Seemed like a pretty strong accusation. I don't think they would worship and adore a God they thought was a monster.Right about what?
How about some syntax?
Thanks.
[/QUOTE]Hi Avigdor,,,welcome to the forum. It's nice to have you here.
We all agree that man's entire being became fallen, contaminated.
Including his will?
Let's think for a moment.
Adam and Eve started out with libertarian Free Will.
Calvinism certainly claims that man lost his free will.
Calvinism claims that God predetermines man's EVERY DECISION 24/7.
If you don't believe this is correct,,,then, honestly, you need to study Calvinism some more.
Now, you may say I'm trying to state what you believe....but this excuse can no longer be accepted by me or others that are not reformed in belief.
Please check up on this. If you can't, I'll be happy to post paragraphs from Calvin's Institutes, but I don't understand why I have to prove what YOU believe.
By the time of Cain and Abel, man had lost free will according to you and so COULD NOT or WOULD NOT choose God.
Please explain why Abel chose God and pleased God if he was UNABLE to choose God..., as you state. Is the O.T. incorrect?
How are we enslaved to sin?
Because we PRESENT OURSELVES to the one we will be enslaved to.
Romans 6:16
16Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness?
Please note that Paul states that we present OURSELVES to the one we wish to obey.
The above statement has a conflict.
First you state that God does NOT choose randomly for NO reason.
This means that God has a reason to choose us.
This means that His choice is conditional.
At the end you state that our election is NOT conditioned on anything about us.
This means God chooses UNCONDITIONALLY.
This is the OPPOSITE of your first statement.
Which is it?
I'll reply when you clarify your statement.
(I believe God chooses us conditionally).
The N.T. states that Jesus died for everyone that wishes to make efficacious use of His sacrifice.
1 John 2:2
2and He Himself is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for those of the whole world.
Of couse this doctrine becomes null if one believes salvation is available to all men, as most Christians do believe.
It also implies that Jesus' sacrifice was not sufficient to save all mankind...
thus minimizing it.
I'm having a problem discussing with you because I'm not sure you understand Calvinism.
What do you mean there is no forcing?
What is compatible free will?
The above would require the absence of libertarian free will.
Jesus will not lose any of those the Father gave Him if they remain in Him and keep abiding in Him.
I, myself, can choose to walk away from God.
Jesus said that if we do not abide in Him,,,we will be thrown away like a dead branch.
John 15:5-6
5“I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing.
6“If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned.
Gotcha. I did some more research on it. Thank you.Michelina,
My answer to your OP is that I consider the Bible teaches Reformed/Classical Arminianism as articulated in The Works of James Arminius. I'm a 'leaky' Reformed Arminian as I don't accept infant baptism.
Oz
You’re right. I seem to get tested by these types of people quite often. Thank you for your encouraging response.Michelina,
You have run into a person who uses emotional bluff to try to intimidate you. The person did that with lingo such as 'false teacher', 'false gospel', you're 'showing the fruit of a child of Satan'.
Run away as quickly as possible from that intimidation. It will not edify and will cause you to ruminate on what the person said.
The person on YouTube has violated the fundamentals of Phil 4:8 (NIV): 'Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable – if anything is excellent or praiseworthy – think about such things'.
Blessings from Down Under,
Oz
Oz,,,,
Just an aside....
Infants were baptized in the early Christian church but not for salvation purposes.
It was to allow them to have blessings from God and to be a part of the community.
It was not until Augustine of Hippo in the 5th century that infants were baptized for salvation purposes because of his teachings, which the church at that time accepted.
Unfortunately.
And which the reformation changed back to its original intent (for those churches that are Protestant that DO baptize infants).
If you believe what Jesus did for us, and who He is, in agreement with what the Bible says about Him, then you are saved. You won't go to hell. And I don't know of any Christian theology that teaches differently. Could you maybe give me specifics? The way I see it, we are all destined to hell until we believe in the Jesus of the Bible.
Hmmm. Can't really remember.
I think the owner's name is William.
Not sure. I was only there about a week.
They were very aggressive and not very nice.
It was a different site...a totally different forum.Was it a thread in a forum or a seperate forum? I'm interested in what they were saying, especially if it was upsetting. But, not that important I guess. Thanks for responding.