V
Vanguard
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
Vanguard has claimed Jesus did not fufill the OT Prophecy that the promised Messiah would come from the line of David.
I used scripture to show that is false. The message of that book of Matthew focuses on the Kingship of Jesus. I could have used this passage.
Matthew 1
The Genealogy of Jesus the Messiah
(condensed by Vanguard for easier reading)
This is the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah son of David, the son of Abraham...
Abraham was the father of Isaac...
...Obed the father of Jesse,
and Jesse the father of King David.
David was the father of Solomon...
Matthan the father of Jacob,
and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, and Mary was the mother of Jesus who is called the Messiah.
Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Messiah.
Yes, that is all great and wonderful. I am all too familiar with them. That is the biological bloodline from Abraham to Joseph. However, you're missing the point.
Joseph didn't father Jesus, God did. Jesus is God's son, not Joseph's. Jesus can't trace his lineage biologically through Joseph back to David. Thus, according to Judaism, that OT prophecy fails.
Now then, let's set the story straight. How de we get from the OT prophecy to Jesus being the Messiah, if He can't be traced back to David biologically? In the Hebrew culture, brother A could take brother B's wife as his own, in order for brother B's lineage to continue, in the event that brother B died without having any offspring. One story that is evident of this belief is Onan.
Put it in a formula:
A = living brother
B = dead brother
C = dead brother's wife
A+C = B's lineage continues, even though A is the actual father of the child. That is the OT Hebrew belief.
Now apply that theory to God, Joseph and Mary.
A = God
B = Joseph
C = Mary
A+C = B's lineage continues, even though Joseph was not dead. Joseph adopts Jesus, raises Him as his own, and in THIS scenario Jesus fulfills the prophecy without being Joseph's biological child. This is not in the Bible. It is a study of ancient history, and it refutes the Jewish argument against Jesus as the Messiah, using their own OT system of beliefs against them! What's good for one is good for another!
Is this a competition to see who can score the most points or a study of the Word? Let's try to remain objective please lest the thread turn sour.
I agree, and that is what I am trying to do (study the Word). But bad information needs to be refuted.
Last edited by a moderator: