Daniel wrote one sentence after another concerning at that time.
But that one verse follows another does not mean the events happen in close proximity in time. I can pull out prophesies that referred to Jesus birth or life that do not then occur with a short time although they are written directly afterwards.
He only needed to write at that time once to say the list of things he said would happen at that time. He needed not to say at that time at beginning every sentence like you claim he would.
He says “at that time” for both previous sentences, both of them. Left it out for that event, the resurrection.
As for Paul's account of the same event. Paul shouldn't need to talk about how terrible of a time it will be on the day of the Lord.
Yes he would have had to because the 2nd coming is not preceded by terrible times which Jesus directly said. There were no terrible times before the flood and so it shall be for his second coming. Jesus says life will be normal. Cannot get much plainer.
Nearly every prophet in the bible has said just how terrible that day will be. Here are just a few verses about that day when christ raises the dead.
This is the day you claim Paul said nothing about tribulation.
For you are fully aware that the Day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night.
biblehub.com
While people are saying, Peace and security, destruction will come upon them suddenly, like labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape.
biblehub.com
The “day of the Lord” is an expression for the Judgement of God against those who slayed his son and the believers. This verse is not right before the passages on the resurrection in Paul’s writing.. They are separated in thought and space.
All of the believers knew of Jesus’ warnings of coming judgement. They were watching for the signs. Their own safety depended upon it.
The great Day of the LORD is near--near and coming quickly. Listen, the Day of the LORD! Then the cry of the mighty will be bitter.
biblehub.com
That day will be a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of destruction and desolation, a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and blackness,
biblehub.com
Not quite, I said the tribulation or Day of our Lord or him coming in the clouds are expressions for God wrathful and just punishment on a peoples for extreme evil. Notice no resurrection is even mentioned.
This is the day you say there is no tribulation.
Jesus likened the day of the Lord to the day Noah closed the door and everyone else died.
As it was in the days of Noah, so will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.
biblehub.com
For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark.
biblehub.com
And they were oblivious, until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man.
biblehub.com
Yes, no signs either in natural phenomena nor between people. No signs at all. Life going on as normal. That is the described situation before the 2nd coming.
Are you ignoring everything written about the day of the Lord so you can say 70 AD is a worse tribulation than the one all the prophets and apostles won't about?
Now this moves from discussing scriptures to accusing me of ignoring scripture, no longer focusing on the argument. The description of the events in 70 AD are the worst ever described in human history. That is not merely me wishing it to be so. They were so horrible one doesn’t want to hear about more than once.
Ive been accused of proselytizing so please know that I am just explaining my faith giving a reason for the hope that is within me. I love discussing scripture and so this is a pleasure for me. And, I thank you for searching the scriptures with me to see if these things be so.
You are, of course, free to believe as you choose and I would defend that right as I would defend you against unjust accusations. I appreciate you explaining your position to me in such detail and yet also responding to my queries. You’ve done well!