Y
Yah1
Guest
Question: If all three are one being, who raised Jesus from the dead?
Jesus is also the Father. Only through Faith do we believe.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Question: If all three are one being, who raised Jesus from the dead?
"The Bible, scriptures and anything that pertains to sin and flesh will never make sense to a person who doesn't believe Jesus was God in the Flesh."
I should of extended that, to say who doesn't believe Jesus was God in the Flesh and doesn't believe Jesus is also the Father. What i mean by not making sense is one who hasn't come to FAITH. FAITH is what saves us from sin. If you haven't come to FAITH you are still in bondage to sin.
If you are a religious person without FAITH, i'm not sure WHAT that is, a Jehovah Witness maybe. Preaching the gospel without FAITH?, why would you do that? I don't think you are ever going to email Kim Walker because you're afraid of what she'll say. Jesus is also the Father, you don't believe this because you don't have FAITH. Email Kim Walker, Free.
I don't know how I can make it any clearer to you. One, I do not care who Kim Walker is or what she believes. Two, you clearly think you believe what Bethel Church believes but I have shown that you in fact do not. So all your appeals to Bethel Church and those at Bethel Church are pointless. What they believe contradicts what you believe but is in agreement with what I believe. Do you understand what I have just said?Yah1 said:Jesus is also the Father. Only through Faith do we believe.
I don't know how I can make it any clearer to you. One, I do not care who Kim Walker is or what she believes. Two, you clearly think you believe what Bethel Church believes but I have shown that you in fact do not. So all your appeals to Bethel Church and those at Bethel Church are pointless. What they believe contradicts what you believe but is in agreement with what I believe. Do you understand what I have just said?
Jesus is not the Father. That is not what the Bible teaches.
Talk about dancing around a question!Question: If all three are one being, who raised Jesus from the dead?
Jesus is also the Father. Only through Faith do we believe.
Originally posted by Free,
There is a very clear distinctness in persons between the Father and the Son--Jesus is the Son and the Father is the Father.
Where do they say that Jesus is also the Father? If that is what they believe, then they are in serious error. The one statement I saw on Bethel's site regarding God was very trinitarian sounding, although it could be open to interpretation.Yes, i understand what you're saying. What they believe is not what you believe, they believe Jesus is also the Father.
Where do they say that Jesus is also the Father? If that is what they believe, then they are in serious error. The one statement I saw on Bethel's site regarding God was very trinitarian sounding, although it could be open to interpretation.
And I'm prepared to. You made a claim and now you need to back it up. Where do any of the people you mentioned and Bethel Church state that Jesus is the Father?FAITH, Free. We can do this all night, but we're not going to get anywhere. kim@jesusculture(dot)org
If the Bible said Jesus is the Father, it simply would not make sense. They are not the same person. That is the error of modalism. How can a Son be his own Father? That is nonsensical.Yah1 said:If the Bible said up front Jesus is also the Father, that would contradict the reasons behind why Jesus died. He wants us to come to FAITH and admit we are sinners. He bore our sins and died a very painful death, if it said Jesus is the Father then either nobody or everybody would believe and him dying painfully would be worthless. That's why is says here Matthew 7:14 - Very few will find FAITH.
This is silly. You seem not to know the role the Holy Spirit often plays in Scripture. Jesus is the Son of God.Can you answer the question I posed before?
According to the Athanasian Creed, the second of the three points of the trinity states:
- The Father is not the Son, the Son is not the Holy Spirit, and THE HOLY SPIRIT IS NOT THE FATHER.
Matthew writes:
Matthew 1:18 "Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Spirit."
Is Jesus the Son of His Father? Or, is He the Son of the Holy Spirit? The Scripture says: "She was found with child of the Holy Spirit."
So, I would ask that you answer the question:
- If the trinity is true, how is it that Jesus Christ was CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, but is the SON OF GOD THE FATHER?
Originally posted by Free,
This is silly. You seem not to know the role the Holy Spirit often plays in Scripture. Jesus is the Son of God.
"The Bible, scriptures and anything that pertains to sin and flesh will never make sense to a person who doesn't believe Jesus was God in the Flesh."
I should of extended that, to say who doesn't believe Jesus was God in the Flesh and doesn't believe Jesus is also the Father. What i mean by not making sense is one who hasn't come to FAITH. FAITH is what saves us from sin. If you haven't come to FAITH you are still in bondage to sin.
If you are a religious person without FAITH, i'm not sure WHAT that is, a Jehovah Witness maybe. Preaching the gospel without FAITH?, why would you do that? I don't think you are ever going to email Kim Walker because you're afraid of what she'll say. Jesus is also the Father, you don't believe this because you don't have FAITH. Email Kim Walker, Free.
For starters, look at what I posted to you previously regarding 1 Cor 8:6 and then read about John 1:1-3,14 below. Whether one considers them explicit or implicit statements is irrelevant. They are both methods of communication.No, I’m not. Free, now you’re saying it’s implied. Please show me where it is implied. It simply doesn’t say anything that requires that the Son has always existed.
And for all intents and purposes, babies are created. The point being, they begin to exist. Jesus did not begin to exist.Butch5 said:It’s not semantic. Babies grow from tow living organisms coming together. This process has been continuous since Adam and Eve. They were the only ones “created.”
Wow. I'm dumbfounded as to how you're completely missing what I am saying. I honestly don't get it. This is not at all hard.Butch5 said:It is. You’re making “Always existed” a requirement for being God. I gave you Scripture that called men gods, surely you wouldn’t suggest that those men have been from eternity. You can’t use the attributes of the Father as the definition of God. If that’s the case then your definition of God doesn’t fit Son either. The Father alone is unbegotten. The Son is begotten. You can’t just pick certain attributes of hte Father and say this is what it means to be God.Free said:No True Scotsman fallacy? lol No, it is not. I must state for the third time: in a discussion on the Trinity in a Christian forum, we most certainly are talking about the God of the Bible, not the general theos or a dictionary definition.
The contexts of the passages make it clear that Jesus is thought of as God in the same way that the Father is thought of as God. If not, Jesus is another god and we then have polytheism.
I have never said that the use of theos requires that one must have always existed. I have clearly stated that theos is used of the Father, the Son and men. I have clearly stated that it can be used as a general term. I have also been clear that it takes on a different nuance in meaning and greater significance when it is used of God. Again, when we are speaking of God--notice the capitalized "G"--there is only one being we are talking about and for him, eternal existence is a necessary attribute.Butch5 said:The point is “theos” is used of both the Father, the Son, and men. Theos is translated from Eloheem. The word Thos does not require one to have always existed. I’ve look at multiple resources and found nothing that says anything about always existing being a definition of theos.
It doesn't matter if one agrees or disagrees that Jesus is "of the Father." Whatever one believes on that matter must take into account Jesus eternal preexistence with the Father.Butch5 said:It doesn’t contradict John 1:1-3. In the beginning refers to the creation.
I don’t know how one could be eternally begotten. The point is Jesus Himself said He came out of the Father. That means He had a beginning. You can say He is the unique one of the Father, the point is that He is “Of” the Father.
It really isn't a legitimate question. The "error" that you are trying to show applies to you as well.It most certainly is NOT silly. What "role of the Holy Spirit" are you referring to? And how is that "role" relevant to the question? Can you answer the question using Scripture, or not?
According to the Athanasian Creed, the second of the three points of the trinity states:
- The Father is not the Son, the Son is not the Holy Spirit, and THE HOLY SPIRIT IS NOT THE FATHER.
The question is:
- If the trinity is true, how is it that Jesus Christ was CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, but is the SON OF GOD THE FATHER?
It's a VERY serious and legitimate question. Can you answer specifically, using the Scriptures?
It most certainly is NOT silly. What "role of the Holy Spirit" are you referring to? And how is that "role" relevant to the question? Can you answer the question using Scripture, or not?
According to the Athanasian Creed, the second of the three points of the trinity states:
- The Father is not the Son, the Son is not the Holy Spirit, and THE HOLY SPIRIT IS NOT THE FATHER.
The question is:
- If the trinity is true, how is it that Jesus Christ was CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, but is the SON OF GOD THE FATHER?
It's a VERY serious and legitimate question. Can you answer specifically, using the Scriptures?
And I'm prepared to. You made a claim and now you need to back it up. Where do any of the people you mentioned and Bethel Church state that Jesus is the Father?
If the Bible said Jesus is the Father, it simply would not make sense. They are not the same person. That is the error of modalism. How can a Son be his own Father? That is nonsensical.